Originally posted by FeliLopez
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Roland Garros 2014.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by EdinTM87 View PostPa s obzirom da bi morao cekati da Rafa napuni 29 ili da udje u cetvrtu deceniju zivota a prije toga izgubio 6 puta bez i jedne pobjede, ne znam kako to drugacije da nazovem.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostPa nije Djokovic 5 godina mladji nego samo godinu dana, ako Nadal udje u cetvrtu deceniju, nije ni Djokovic daleko
Pa maloprije si rekla da ce Novak puno vise trajati od Nadala jer ovaj od 2004. na touru ima toliko meceva u nogama a i problema sa povredama.Ubi te kontradiktornost.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EdinTM87 View PostPa maloprije si rekla da ce Novak puno vise trajati od Nadala jer ovaj od 2004. na touru ima toliko meceva u nogama a i problema sa povredama.Ubi te kontradiktornost.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeptik View PostLendla vise nema ali objasni mi ovo najdominatniji igrac na hardu. Kako si ti to zakljucio? Daj mi neke objektivne parametre: titule, pobede, H2H ... pa da diskutujemo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostDa, smatram da ce duze trajati, ali ako Nadal udje u finale sa 30 godina, znaci da sam nisam bila u pravu i da je jos uvek jak, i ako tada igra protiv Djokovica (koji ce imati 29) i Djokovic ga dobije, tvoj argument pada u vodu, je l' ti je sad jasnije?
Comment
-
Ma kakavi ovi. Ni Djokovic ni Nadal nece moci trajati preko 29 godina. Sa 30 pocinje i gubitak koraka i laganini ce da se gase. Tehnicki njihovi udarci nisu besprijekorni, odnosno svaki njihov udarac zahtjeva mnogo energije, koje ce biti sve manje i manje kako godine odmicusigpic
"IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"
Comment
-
Originally posted by EdinTM87 View PostNe mora da znaci da je jos uvijek dovoljno jak za Novaka koji je igracki dosta mladji od njega vec da je konkurencija takva da on i preko 30 godina moze pobjedjivati one koji ga ne mogu ugroziti. Jasno?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shpageti View PostAj ok,kakav je njihov uchinak do sad na GS-ovima protiv njega ? sa Nadalom ako ne grijeshim 7-3 ...a sa Fedom valjda 5 5 ...to je neka velika razlika po tebi ?
Ja sam mislio uopšte da nije baš šampion kao njih dvojica.
Rafa i Roger ne bi nikad dozvolili Endiju da preko njihovih leđa uzme 2 GS-a."When I was young, I never wanted to leave the court until I got things exactly correct. My dream was to become a pro."-Larry Bird
"Da budale svijetle ja bi bio zvjezda danica".
Comment
-
Originally posted by maliajnstajn View PostMa kakavi ovi. Ni Djokovic ni Nadal nece moci trajati preko 29 godina. Sa 30 pocinje i gubitak koraka i laganini ce da se gase. Tehnicki njihovi udarci nisu besprijekorni, odnosno svaki njihov udarac zahtjeva mnogo energije, koje ce biti sve manje i manje kako godine odmicusigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostPo tebi ce znaciti da i corava koka ubode neko zrno, tako se rekao
Comment
-
Није било лако ни Рафи, има и он лимит.. надам се само да ће костур за турнир бити реалније постављен, а не без муке да дође до финала... ако је тако, онда и Рафа може тако још дуго година... ако је свету потребна таква легенда, онда ће тако и бити!sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by maliajnstajn View PostMa kakavi ovi. Ni Djokovic ni Nadal nece moci trajati preko 29 godina. Sa 30 pocinje i gubitak koraka i laganini ce da se gase. Tehnicki njihovi udarci nisu besprijekorni, odnosno svaki njihov udarac zahtjeva mnogo energije, koje ce biti sve manje i manje kako godine odmicu"When I was young, I never wanted to leave the court until I got things exactly correct. My dream was to become a pro."-Larry Bird
"Da budale svijetle ja bi bio zvjezda danica".
Comment
Comment