Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Australian open 2014 (AO)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by skeptik View Post
    Par korekcija sa moje strane:


    Novak

    1. Lacko --------prosecan 2
    2. Mayer ------- prosecan 2
    3. Bagdatis----- prosecan 2+
    4. Gulbis-------- tezak 4-
    5. Vavrinka----- tezak 4
    6. Ferer-------- srednje tezak 3+

    Nadal

    1. Tomic -------- srednje tezak 3-
    2. Sijsling ------- lak 1
    3. Monfis-------- srednje tezak 3+
    4. Hewitt ------- tezak 4 ( Raonic/Dimitrov su u Delpovom delu zreba tako da ne moze da se sastane sa njima pre QF )
    5. Delpo------- vrlo tezak 4+
    6. Mari/Federer-- tezak 4 ( ne toliko zbog protivnika vec vise zbog toga sto ce se Nadal neminovno istrositi u mecevima protiv Monfisa, Hewitta i Delpa )

    Nadal na papiru ima tezi zreb ali mislim da prolazi u finale sa 80% sigurnosti, Novak sa 90%. Videcemo.
    U svojim korekcijama, koje imaju logike, ne uzimas u obzir kolo. Tomic je u finalu izuzetno lak protivnik a u prvom kolu izuzetno tezak.

    Vavrinka u cetvrfinalu nije tezak protivnik. Alternativa su Berdih koji je laksi od Vavrinke iako je Tomas pobijedio Novaka prosle godine; Delpo koji je jasno tezi protivnik od Vavrinke; i Federer koji ipak mora biti tezi protivnik od Vavrinke.

    Slicnim rezonom smatram Gulbisa osrednjim protivnikom. Nisam siguran da ce on proci Fabija, ali Conga, Raonic, Izner, Janovic i Has su otprilike teski protivnici u 4. kolu.
    Last edited by NI; 10-01-14, 11:46.

    Comment


    • Fabio zijani od silnog Bhambrija, nista od njega

      Bas mi sega sto se smatra da je Boris zasluzan za dobar Novakov zrijeb...poprilicno lake zrijebove ima u zadnjih godinu dana na svim turnirima

      od kako je postao klijent IMGa...il kako se vec zove firma

      Comment


      • Ma Djokovic je sad na svom vrhuncu, ne postoji tezak zreb za njega, isto kao sto Role nije imao tezak zreb kad je vladao, sasvim jednostavno.
        Nikakav Beker, IMG, Nike itd. nisu zasluzni, nego oni sto igraju ili su igrali mnogo bolje od svih ostalih.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Ma dobro, sto NI kaze...kako god da su rasporedili igrace za njih dvojicu bi zrijeb bio lagan...ali je ovaj Novakov bas lagan

          Comment


          • Cinjenica je da ovaj spada u bas lake, to ce mu znaciti posto ce doci sveziji u SF i finale. Nadal, ako bude imao projektovani zreb, moze vise da se potrosi do finala, ali isto tako ce onda biti spreman za jake meceve, tako da i to ima svojih prednosti
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Kad bi Roger osvojio ovaj AO preko Verdasca, Tsonge, Murraya, Rafe i Novaka...prestao bih gledati tenis!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by NI View Post
                i Federer koji iapak mora biti tezi protivnik od Vavrinke.
                Mnogo je opasniji Wawrinka od Goaterera, iako ga shminka ne smatra nekim igračem, 2x je napisao da je sve što valja kod Nadala

                Comment


                • Originally posted by shminka View Post
                  Kad bi Roger osvojio ovaj AO preko Verdasca, Tsonge, Murraya, Rafe i Novaka...prestao bih gledati tenis!
                  Ne brini, nastavices da gledas tenis
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Ima li gdje lista LLa

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by shminka View Post
                      Kad bi Roger osvojio ovaj AO preko Verdasca, Tsonge, Murraya, Rafe i Novaka...prestao bih gledati tenis!
                      Da bi upotpunio ovu SF priču briši Novaka i u finale meći Stanislava
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by notorious View Post
                        Mnogo je opasniji Wawrinka od Goaterera, iako ga shminka ne smatra nekim igračem, 2x je napisao da je sve što valja kod Nadala
                        notorious,

                        Ti volis da pecnes shminku. Nema tu nista lose.

                        A sad salu na stranu. Varika ima vise sansi da dodje u dobijenu pioziciju protiv Novaka nego Federer, ali Vavrinaka ce vrlo vjerovatno dobijenu poziciju da upropasti, a Federer vjerovatno nece.

                        Comment


                        • Novak

                          1. Lacko --------prosecan/tezak 3-
                          2. Montanjes ------- lak/prosecan 1+
                          3. Bagdatis----- prosecan/tezak 3 (nikad nije Kipranin bio lak za Noleta)
                          4. Gulbis-------- prosecan/tezak 3 ili Fabio----- prosecan 2
                          5. Vavrinka----- tezak 3+
                          6. Ferer-------- prosecan/tezak 3
                          7. Nadal-------super tezak 5
                          Nadal

                          1. Tomic -------- tezak 4-
                          2. Kokkinakis ------- lak/prosecan 2-
                          3. Monfis-------- prosecan /tezak 3
                          4. Hewitt ------- tezak 3+
                          5. Delpo------- bas tezak 4 ili Raonic 3 pro/tezak
                          6. Mari/Federer-- prosecan/tezak 3
                          7. Djokovic-------extra tezak 5+ nepremostiva tvrdjava
                          Last edited by salinjo90; 10-01-14, 11:59.

                          Comment


                          • Lacko 1
                            Montanes -2
                            Bagi -najtezi protivnik, da je normalan...ali posto nije 2
                            Gulbis 3
                            Wawrinka 3+
                            Ferrer 3

                            Comment


                            • salinjo,

                              Samo da primijetim da Nadal ima 7 a Novak 6 protivnika. Pretpostavljanm da ti se omaklo. Je li to los znak?

                              Comment


                              • Na ovim projektovanim listama najteži bi trebao biti Raonić, dok bi tortoljubac bio na odličnom drugom mestu
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X