Australian Open 2018

[Unofficialpage]

Čilić ne može i ne smije kriviti krov što je nesposoban da dobije Federera koji se jedva kreće, na svaku lopticu kasni i ubjedljivo najlošiji meč na cijelom AO Federer je odigrao u finalu. Čilić u tim okolnostima je morao dobiti Federera, imao je momentum, Rogera koji kasni na svaku lopticu... Nije uspio i u svemu tome treba samo sebe kriviti a ne tražiti krivca tamo gdje ga nema. A i mislim da su potpuno nebitni rasporedi mečeva, onaj ko zna u svim uslovima pobjeđuje.

[MarRF]

Glede Federera i ove price oko favorizovanja, mali osvrt njegovog navijaca.

Vjerovatno jeste igrac koji najcesce igra na centralnim terenima, udarnim terminima , itd...ali zasto je to tako?
Zato sto on donosi novac, zato sto njega hoce da gleda ubedljivo najvise ljudi sirom sveta, zato sto je on kako rekoste "zlatna koka", i jeste sve je to tacno u potpunosti i apsolutno.
I nije to glavno pitanje, po meni treba se zapitati kako je to uspeo? Pokusacu da dam bar deo odgovora.....

Svako ko je pratio Roleta svih ovih godina zavoleo je stil kojim igra, tu kretnju koja izgleda poput " plesa" u odnosu na sve ostale, tu mirnocu, tu posvecenost iznova i iznova, te intervjue na ovom ili onom jeziku, tu opremu koja stoji kao salivena, te emocije koje izbiju i koje ne kontrolise, taj perfektan porodicni zivot bez starleta i pijanki.......ima toga jos koliko hoces. To nije iskopirao, to je on doneo i tako je stvorio svoj imidz kojim je postao " gradjanin sveta" a ne samo Svajcarske. I imate jednu paradoksalnu situaciju da ljudi sirom sveta navijaju za njega a ne za domace igrace. To je prosto nesto neverovatno, neobjasnjivo !

Po meni tu nije glavno pitanje, glavno pitanje je nesto drugo? zasto njegovi rivali ne mogu da ga sustignu kada je popularnost u pitanju? Ako ikada to urade igrace oni udarne termine a ne on. To je tako jednostavno u svetu sportske industrije.
Publika ce svakako dati konacan sud o svacijoj igrackoj ili nekoj drugoj velicini, tu greske nema......

A kada ga publika da taj ce da dobije vecernji RLA i centar W...itd, zvao se on Federer ili ne znam ko....

[Beocca]

nemoj o opremi,molim te,urnebesna je

ali ovo je spin-ti objašnjavaš zašto je omiljen,umiljat,mio etc,a mnogo ljudi pita zašto je bio TOLIKO favorizovan,pa i do tog famoznog krova-briga za igrače?nije nego,igrali su se taj dan i dnevni mečevi

ali dobro,niko nije slep kao onaj što neće da vidi.

ostalo objasnio torpedo


dodato-Roger Federer also has more connections with the Australian Open than most others. His management company, TEAM8, was in association with Tennis Australia in creating the Laver Cup. Tennis Australia being the governing body of the Australian Open with CEO Craig Tiley being the director of the grand slam. This could have possibly led to favouritism for the six-time champion due to a conflict of interests. No wonder John McEnroe joked, “What’s the difference between privilege and blatant cheating?”

[bojanaBG]

Da, igrao se taj dan dnevni mec, finale mix dubla, isto pod krovom.

[Sandugp]

Koliko cesto Stan igra na centralnom terenu u odnosu na big 4?
samo da krenemo od toga, a da ne spominjem ostale iz top 10...

Nisu isti uslovi samo Centralni teren Bojana.
Zar ne?

A sto se mene tice, mrzim sto si ti srecna, zbog toga mi je najzalije sto je Federer uzeo . Dok na primer sa druge strane obozavam Vucinu, pa mi je drago izrazito zbog njega. I onda samog sebe stavljam u zajebanu sittuaciju: Federer treba da osvoji je u sebi pomislim "To Gandalf ce biti srecan, bas mi je milo!" ali onda u istom trenutku pomislim i "O neeeee! Ali i Bojana ce biti srecna, ko ce je trpeti tek sada ???!?!?!! "
Nakon toga ne znam sta da mislim, pa se pogubim u mislima ....
Opet kada vidim ovoliko uvlacenje i ovolike privilegije ne mogu sebe da nateram da se radujem pa ni zbog Mitrandira.

[bojanaBG]

Nisu isti uslovi samo Centralni teren Bojana.
Zar ne?

A sto se mene tice, mrzim sto si ti srecna, zbog toga mi je najzalije sto je Federer uzeo . Dok na primer sa druge strane obozavam Vucinu, pa mi je drago izrazito zbog njega. I onda samog sebe stavljam u zajebanu sittuaciju: Federer treba da osvoji je u sebi pomislim "To Gandalf ce biti srecan, bas mi je milo!" ali onda u istom trenutku pomislim i "O neeeee! Ali i Bojana ce biti srecna, ko ce je trpeti tek sada ???!?!?!! "
Nakon toga ne znam sta da mislim, pa se pogubim u mislima ....
Opet kada vidim ovoliko uvlacenje i ovolike privilegije ne mogu sebe da nateram da se radujem pa ni zbog Mitrandira.

Volim i ja tebe Sandu

[NEMANJA97]

Ja ne znam što tolika priča oko krova i svega. Mislim svi znaju koliko ne volim Federera. Nego kad sam video da je ušlo u peti set, prosto me iznenadilo. Rekoh tad ma Čilić i da povede u petom opet će sam Federeru pomoći da uzme titulu.
Nije mi jasno što neki osporavaju Karolininu titulu... Ok Halep je svašta preživela i naravno da je svima bio najžešći meč sa Kerber, ali Halep da nije tad igrala sa Kerber.
Onda bi je u finalu Kerber mnogo lakše dobila. Mora Halep sačekati da u finale uđe neka protiv koje će nekako uspeti da se izbori.

[pecaros]

Evo jedan tekst iz belog sveta kao prilog stavovima one druge strane, one po kojoj niko nije veci od same igre.
Posto nema potpisa autora tekst je u spojleru.

Spoiler

Okay, sorry for the diatribe! This is what I have sent to Tennis Australia, Rolex and Australian Open, ITF and the integrity unit....Following the disgraceful events of the Australian Open tennis tournament this year, there are several things that need to be looked into, at the very least. I have been a tennis fan since the age of 12 and this is the first Australian Open I have missed in the past 35+ years - a calculated and deliberate decision on my part as I was so disgusted by the preferential treatment afforded one player, to the detriment of all the others. I see no reason why Roger Federer should get such blatantly advantageous scheduling (to say nothing of his cupcake draw – this is nothing unusual, of course and luck surely cannot be a factor every time.)
Furthermore, the relationship Federer has with the Australian Open and Rod Laver in particular is way too close for comfort. Let’s not forget that it was Roger Federer’s management company, Team8, that with Rod Laver and in association with Tennis Australia, staged the Laver Cup. Rod Laver has always very publicly supported Roger Federer in so far as publicly declaring him the greatest player ever and it begs the question – does the Tennis Australia, the Australian Open and Rod Laver have anything to do with Federer’s renaissance comeback? As Tennis Australia is the governing body of the Australian Open with CEO Craig Tiley being the director of the grand slam, this is a definite conflict of interest!
It is incredibly suspicious that at his age he can win 3 grand slams (even with all the help that the tournament organisers are giving him) at the ripe old age of 35 and 36 when for 5 years previously, he wasn’t even close to achieving one. His new, improved backhand simply cannot be reason enough, or in fact can the bigger racquet he is now using. Furthermore, Rolex being the official partner of ALL the Grand Slams and Federer’s personal sponsor has the most to gain when trying to cement this myth of Roger Federer being the GOAT….. Something definitely stinks in the state of Denmark!
In order for transparency and to allay the fears and suspicions of the fans (after all, it is we who buy the tickets for the seats at these events) there needs to be a full enquiry into the increasingly one-sided treatment that is doled out to Roger Federer. Last year when there were rumblings that the court speeds had deliberately been sped up to favour Federer, the tournament director, Craig Tiley issued a statement to say that they were the same as in previous years yet when Jim Courier conducted tests, he found out that the court speeds in the AO 2017 were in fact faster than the Wimbledon Centre Court had been in 2016. This of course, leads to an obvious feeling that something is amiss and that there is a cover-up of magnificent proportions. The scheduling of the men’s semi-finals last year was also grossly unfair, affording Federer again with a blatantly unfair advantage. In his match against Stan Wawrinka, Federer admitted later that the MTO he had employed in that match was more mental than anything else. Quite frankly I am aghast that such blatant cheating is allowed. Federer’s match concluded at 11.42 am; a match lasting just over 3 hours. Rafa Nadal’s match however lasted close to 5 hours and concluded after 3 am allowing him a mere 40 hours recovery time whilst Federer enjoyed the best part of 3 days rest before their final. And again, Federer takes an extended MTO in the final set in very suspicious circumstances. There did not appear to be anything wrong with his ability to move either before the MTO and certainly not after it.
Moving on to this year’s Open… For the second year in a row, Fed has entered the Final with 5 of his 6 matches having been payed in the evening when it is much cooler and he even admitted he requested night matches and was then ceremoniously awarded them and played 12 out of 14 matches on Rod Laver Arena, compared to Cilic played just 3 of his matches at night and one was not even on Rod Laver. Understandably Fed is a big attraction, but he is not the only attraction and he is certainly not the only player bringing in revenue. In the 5 years that he did not win a slam, revenue was not down, seats still sold and television audiences still tuned in so this “cash cow” story does not wash with me at all! There are seldom seats spare at a Rafa Nadal match and likewise with the Djoker, the 6 time winner of this tournament (and he achieved this BEFORE Federer achieved his 6th title here!) These are just 2 examples but there are countless others.
It seems to me that all of Federer’s main rivals (players like Del Potro and Goffin whom had both beaten him very recently!) from his section of the draw were delegated to play in the scorching heat with no respite whatsoever, and perhaps they may have been knocked out early anyway but the searing temperatures certainly made that more likely!

On Day 4 of the Australian Open, Djokovic v Monfils (considered the hottest day of the 2 weeks), the temperature soaring to 42C, the roof remained open saying that one of the conditions (WBGT) was not met. Monfils was clearly suffering but was not even granted extra time between points, despite feeling dizzy and nauseous.
Three out of the eight quarterfinalists were effectively beaten by injury, and the heat - the heat sapping their energy, blistering their feet in Chung’s case and indirectly causing injury to Nadal. Rafa Nadal and Hyeon Chung had to retire from their matches whilst Kyle Edmund albeit playing to the end of the match, but he was in no condition to be competitive.
Also, as Federer only played night matches, (only after several complaints about his night play, he is finally scheduled to play a day match, but hang on, it is the coolest day so far of the 2 weeks! He’s had maximum rest as the others had to contend with alternative night and day matches – despite the “cash cow” theory that had Federer played during the day, this would have played as a live match in the evening for a lot of the networks (prime viewing time!) again… preferential and biased treatment so blatant and it seemingly has no limit! From the WTA point of view, Halep had to play late one evening and then the very next day during the day but was she afforded any air conditioning or the roof closed in her finals match against Wozinaci, a decision that impacted on her own health and forced her to be hospitalised for dehydration overnight.
During his semi-final, Federer is too hot and requests that the air con is put on ---- and what do you know, his wish is granted like some genie from a Disney film.So, we arrive at the Men’s Finals Day, the temperature is 37C and WBGT is 32.6…. Marin Cilic is practicing outdoors, conveniently and very suspiciously, Roger Federer is playing indoors on the Margaret Court Arena no less. How on earth can that be a co-incidence? But wait… only ONE condition is met for the heat rules and what happens????? The roof is closed for this outdoor event – clearly favouring Federer – having played mostly night matches, he is accustomed to the cooler conditions and even on a hot night like the final was, with the roof being closed, it kept the conditions cool without having to adapt to different conditions. Additionally, Federer has the best indoor record with having won the most indoor titles in the history of tennis – an indoor match is almost guaranteed for him to emerge as the victor!
When you consider that the Ladies Final wasn’t played with the roof closed despite the temperatures, or that the Djokovic V Monfils didn’t succeed in attaining any relief from the scorching heat - and the Men’s Final did, for no apparent reason is just too fishy for words!
In conclusion, it is just way too hot for the Australian Open to be scheduled at this time and consideration should be given to moving it to later, possibly March or April where the players can also enjoy a longer off- season break.

[bojanaBG]

Jadan AO, sta ce on bez ovog navijaca, bankrotirace

toliko ima rupa u njegovoj teoriji, da je smesno i komentarisati

[pecaros]

Da, bankrotiraće baš kao što je bankrotirao i u godinama kada ga Federer nije osvajao.

[bojanaBG]

Eto, sam si sebi odgovorio, niko ne moze nijednom teniseru da osvoji titulu osim njega samog.

[pecaros]

Ili bolje rečeno niko nikad nije imao veću pomoć da osvoji.

[bojanaBG]

A zasto onda nisu stavili da njegova polovina igra prva, pa da ima 2 dana pred finale?
Kako se to sad uklapa u teoriju?

[pecaros]

U svakom planu ma koliko bio savršen potkrade se neka greška, tako i u ovom.

[bojanaBG]

Hahaahahahah, kad nema logicnog odgovora, onda je greska
inace, organizatori misle na svaki detalj da olaksaju Rogeru, ali su zaboravili da ga stave da igra prvog dana