Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

INDIAN WELLS 2017

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roleta stavis na bilo koju podlogu, on se prilagodi...
    ovu dvojicu stavis na malo brzu podlogu i malo drugaciju, kukaju, placu zajedno sa fanovima
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by NEMANJA97 View Post
      Nismo baš gledali Federera kako rastura na šljaci
      Fed ima preko 10 titula na svakoj podlozi
      Ima preko 10 titula i na sljaci iako je igrao u isto vreme kad i najbolji igrac na toj podlozi svih vremena, mislim da je to vise nego dovoljno
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Novak je "kukao" samo na onoj odvratnoj plavoj šljaci, ako me sećanje dobro služi, hvala bogu.
        sigpic

        Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
        But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

        Comment


        • Sad odjednom Del Potro koji nikad nije imao previse razvijen servis siba taj prvi kao madman, imas Kverija koji dobija Djokovica i Nadala, a nista ne zna bez da servira i opali loptu iz sve snage. Lopata, śekira, maca njima treba, da budu drustvenokorisni clanovi drustva.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • Bojana kako nije onda osvojio Monte Carlo Hahahah pa nije uvek bitno samo nekoga odbraniti po svaku cenu Pogotovo kad je Rodžer u tvom slučaju

            Comment


            • Hhhj

              Comment


              • Originally posted by NEMANJA97 View Post
                Bojana kako nije onda osvojio Monte Carlo Hahahah pa nije uvek bitno samo nekoga odbraniti po svaku cenu Pogotovo kad je Rodžer u tvom slučaju
                Aha, znaci MC je najbitniji turnir na sljaci?
                Jbg, izgleda da Roletu niko nije to javio, on se jadnicak trudio da osvoji RG
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by miloolja View Post
                  Novak je "kukao" samo na onoj odvratnoj plavoj šljaci, ako me sećanje dobro služi, hvala bogu.
                  Kao što je i Nadal, potpuno se slažem!

                  Comment


                  • A Role nije ni tada kukao, nego se prilagodio
                    to je ta razlika
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                      Aha, znaci MC je najbitniji turnir na sljaci?
                      Jbg, izgleda da Roletu niko nije to javio, on se jadnicak trudio da osvoji RG
                      Pa koliko znam to je najsporija šljaka , toliko o univerzalnosti E to je ta razlika

                      Comment


                      • Ooooooooo kukumakao je, kukumakao je godinama, pa kad vise nije znao sta ce rekao da mu vise odgovaraju sporiji tereni i da tereni nisu razlog zbog kojih ne osvaja Slamove, iako naravno jesu. Bi li on dobio i jedan mec na AOu koji je otisao u pet da AO nije bio najbrzii turnir poslednjih godina? Tesko, jedan mozda, tri nikako.

                        "Just make quicker courts, then it's hard to defend. Then attacking style is more important," the 31-year-old Swiss, a free-hitting shot-maker whose defensive skills cannot be overlooked in his 17 grand slam titles, told reporters.

                        "It's only on this type of slow courts that you can defend the way we are all doing right now.

                        "I think it's exciting, but no doubt about it, it's tough. What you don't want is that you hit 15 great shots and at the end, it ends up in an error.

                        "I think sometimes quicker courts do help the cause. I think it would help from time to time to move to something faster. That would help players learn different styles, to realize that coming to the net is a good thing, not a bad thing."
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
                          Sad odjednom Del Potro koji nikad nije imao previse razvijen servis siba taj prvi kao madman, imas Kverija koji dobija Djokovica i Nadala, a nista ne zna bez da servira i opali loptu iz sve snage. Lopata, śekira, maca njima treba, da budu drustvenokorisni clanovi drustva.
                          Uvijek me odusevi kako Raonica preskocis.

                          Inace ako hoce postici raznovrsnost, tj. dobiti nazad volej igru, sjetite kako je Misa Zverev pobijedio Marija, odgovor je samo jedan. Lagano ubrzati neke turnire i smanjiti servis polje. Moguge da bi i lagano dizanje mrezice dobro doslo.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by NEMANJA97 View Post
                            Pa koliko znam to je najsporija šljaka , toliko o univerzalnosti E to je ta razlika
                            znaci osvojio je preko 10 titula na sljaci, ali posto nije osvojio MC, iako je igrao par puta u finalu, on nije univerzalan igrac?
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Pa nisam ga preskocio, eno ga drugi na listi
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                              • Pa i Nadal i Nole su osvajali sva 4 GS. Ne mozes na travi imati 10 titula jer ima samo 2 turnira (oba u isto vreme) i to igraci igraju samo za pripremu pred W. Za servere se slazem, ali opet sa druge strane ako si najbolji, treba da se prilagodis i brzim uslovima. Nadal kada pregura prvu nedelju na W svaki, bukvalno svaki put ide do finala, ali moras proci i servere i brzu podlogu u prvoj nedelji.
                                Last edited by colchonero; 15-03-17, 13:14.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X