Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roland Garros 2014.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Berdih i sljaka ko ja i Jessica Alba. Slazemo se super, evo vec dvoje dece i trece na putu.
    There's something wrong with me chemically
    Something wrong with me inherently
    The wrong mix in the wrong genes
    I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
    It was the wrong plan
    In the wrong hands
    With the wrong theory for the wrong man
    The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
    The wrong questions with the wrong replies

    Comment


    • Osim titule u Minhenu ja se ne sjecam njegove druge na shljaci.
      SignaturE se cheka ...sigpic

      Comment


      • Originally posted by chofy88 View Post
        Kako onda objasnjavas da ubedljivo najmanji procenat pobeda ima upravo na RG, i to nije mala razlika u odnosu na ostale slemove?
        Da to je dobro pitanje. Objasnjavam losijom konkurencijom na travi ili, ako hoces, jacom konkurencijom na sljaci. Isto tako uzmi u obzir da je Berdihov postotak u Uimbldonu malo napumpan zbog finala 2010, kada je pobijedio i Federera i Novaka. Ni jedan ni drugi nisu bili u sjajnoj formi. Konacno Berdihova karijera je imala tri jasne faze. Prva, kada je bljesnuo ali nije postao klasa. Druga, kada je popravlja igru i konacno treca kada je dostigao ovaj danasnji nivo. Racunam da se to desilo 2010. Ja u principu uzimam samo ovaj zadnji period.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by shpageti View Post
          Pa shta si sada napisala ...?
          Plava shljaka pa je zato igrao finale jer mu odgovara BRZA podloga i odmah si bila kontroverzna sa time da mu odjednom odgovra normalna shljaka ?
          Izvini , mozda se nisam najbolje izrazila , ali ne vidim da je taj eksperiment pokazao bilo sta sem da je Federer tu odlicno odradio turnir, najbolje se snasao , prilagodio.Berd je odigrao finale pod spletom okolnosti.
          Ne vidim nista problematicno da se ne slazemo u misljenjima,ja i dalje smatram da njemu vise odgovara sljaka i spori hard , a titula nema mnogo svakako.Da se ne multipliciramo NI i Bojana su vec odgovorili
          Similis simili gaudet

          Comment


          • Originally posted by shpageti View Post
            Osim titule u Minhenu ja se ne sjecam njegove druge na shljaci.
            Prva titula mu je bila na sljaci, Palermo jos 2004.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              Prva titula mu je bila na sljaci, Palermo jos 2004.
              Da,bash je to uspjeh za sjecanje,meni se ne gugla oko toga,izvini
              SignaturE se cheka ...sigpic

              Comment


              • Originally posted by shpageti View Post
                Da,bash je to uspjeh za sjecanje,meni se ne gugla oko toga,izvini
                Nije tesko, odes na ATP sajt i pogledas
                Ali on ima samo 9 titula, nema on 30 pa da kazem da su 2 malo, nego ima 9.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Maxx-a View Post
                  Izvini , mozda se nisam najbolje izrazila , ali ne vidim da je taj eksperiment pokazao bilo sta sem da je Federer tu odlicno odradio turnir, najbolje se snasao , prilagodio.Berd je odigrao finale pod spletom okolnosti.
                  Ne vidim nista problematicno da se ne slazemo u misljenjima,ja i dalje smatram da njemu vise odgovara sljaka i spori hard , a titula nema mnogo svakako.Da se ne multipliciramo NI i Bojana su vec odgovorili
                  OK je sve,samo shto eto ovo prvi put nocas prochitah,bolje je shto nisam chuo,da
                  Objasnio sam a i momci isto- njemu da odgovara sporija podloga znachi LOGIKE nema za takvim mishljenjem.
                  Slazem se ja sa tobom inache,ali ovog puta drastichno ne
                  SignaturE se cheka ...sigpic

                  Comment


                  • Uostalom sam Berdih kaze da voi brze podloge, tako da nema potrebe pametovati.
                    sloboda ili ništa

                    Comment


                    • Ali ja garantiram da Berdych da igra 50 RG-a neće dobit Novaka i Rogera, a na W ima puno veće šanse to napraviti ma koliko "manje vremena" imao da se namjesti na udarac, što je i napravio

                      Comment


                      • Berdychu je najbitnije da ima krov nad glavom...jer je samo u tim uslovima njegov servis odličan...u ostalim u najmanju ruku prosječan s obzirom na visinu

                        Podloge su danas u pet deka, tako da je Berdychov FH podjednako dobar na svakoj...a pogotovo je dobar kada ima malo više vremena da se na njega namjesti...što je u mogučnosti na šljaci...

                        A isto tako na svakoj podlozi ima dosta rupa koje mnogi teniseri koriste...pisao sam o tome u nekim analizama mečeva protiv Stana...jednodimenzijalan je Berdych, pa se protiv njega stvarno na razne načine može igrati vrlo efikasno...

                        O čemu govori i broj titula koje je do sada skupio u karijeri...jako mali broj u odnosu na očekivanja s početka karijere...nadju mnogi te rupe u njegovoj igri

                        Moglo bi se posebno odraditi neka analiza kako s pojedinim igračima prolazi na odredjenoj podlozi...Sa Federerom trenutno može na svakoj, protiv Murraya je na šljaci osjetno bolji, na brzim podlogama su tu negdje...protiv Rafe i Novaka ne može ni na jednoj...apsolutno je svejedno gdje igraju
                        Last edited by shminka; 01-06-14, 22:43.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by kreso34 View Post
                          Ali ja garantiram da Berdych da igra 50 RG-a neće dobit Novaka i Rogera, a na W ima puno veće šanse to napraviti ma koliko "manje vremena" imao da se namjesti na udarac, što je i napravio
                          To je druga stvar, na brzim podlogama razlika izmedju igraca je mnogo manja, poena, dva mogu da odluce ceo set, a tako i mec
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Berd kamen spoticanja, ko bi rekao.
                            Ja prvenstveno govorim ono sto licno vidim u necijoj igri, uopste ne isterujem mak na konac.Vi mislite drugacije, i to mi je ok.
                            Oko titula -verujem da vecina vas smatra da je Novak bolji igrac na sljaci nego na travi, retoricki receno
                            Similis simili gaudet

                            Comment


                            • Pogledajte ovako.

                              Gdje moze Berdih pobijediti najlakse:

                              -Nadala (nigdje)
                              -Novaka (RG)
                              -Federera (USO, AO)
                              -Marija (RG)
                              -DP-a (RG)
                              -Ferera (Wim)
                              -Vavrinku (Wim)
                              -Isnera (RG)
                              -Raonica (RG)
                              -Fonjinija (Wim)
                              -Andersona (svuda)
                              -Gulbisa (RG)
                              -Monfisa (Wim)
                              -Tsongu (AO)
                              -Gaskea (RG)

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Maxx-a View Post
                                Berd kamen spoticanja, ko bi rekao.
                                Ja prvenstveno govorim ono sto licno vidim u necijoj igri, uopste ne isterujem mak na konac.Vi mislite drugacije, i to mi je ok.
                                Oko titula -verujem da vecina vas smatra da je Novak bolji igrac na sljaci nego na travi, retoricki receno
                                Konacno da analiziramo i druge igrace, da se ne vrtimo stalno oko istih
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X