Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roland Garros 2014.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ne mozes sa sigurnoscu tvrditi da glumi a i da glumi 6 puta je manje iritantni od Fonje šanera.

    Comment


    • Fonjini je iskren i to se vidi, barem meni tako izgleda i on na kojem god turniru igra ponasa se kako se ponasa. Rodik je bio "faca" samo u Americi, a prilicno miran u Evropi i Aziji.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • Znao je Roddick da luduje i Australiji, Madridu, Londonu, to mi odmah padne napamet a mogao bi dosta izvuci. Ali moras uzeti u obzir koliko turnira Amerika ima.

        Sve u svemu Fonjini nije smijesan a ni zanimljiv a Roddick je bio to oboje.

        Comment


        • Mene uopšte ne nervira ono što Fabio ponekad radi, gotivan mi je lik skroz. Da ga nema trebalo bi ga izmisliti.

          Naravno da ne mogu sa sigurnošću tvrditi da Rodik glumi već mi tako djeluje.

          Comment


          • Roddick se bese prvi pobunio javno kad je Novak redom predavao izgubljene meceve da bi imao sto manje poraza... i to je jedino pametno sto je rekao u svim intervjuima

            Comment


            • Ako neko preda u toku meca to je poraz
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Skroz ste skrenuli sa teme, iskljucivo o RGu treba da se prica, a ne o tome ko glumi, ko predaje itd.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Ne znam samo zbog čega je Rodiku bilo bitno to što neko drugi predaje meč. Uostalom ta konstatacija "da bi imao manje poraza" nema veze sa logikom.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FeliLopez View Post
                    Roddick se bese prvi pobunio javno kad je Novak redom predavao izgubljene meceve da bi imao sto manje poraza... i to je jedino pametno sto je rekao u svim intervjuima
                    A meni se bas sviđa "I think Djoker wins it"

                    Comment


                    • Fognini i Rodick totalno razlciti temperamenti ali obojica su j....s , licno ni u jednom ni u drugom slucaju ne vidim nista pozitivno u tome.
                      Similis simili gaudet

                      Comment


                      • Izvinite za of topik ali sutra mislim da ce Busar pobjediti u duela sa Gergesom, a i da ce Simon razmontirati Gonzalesa.
                        OVAKO

                        Comment


                        • Definitvno moram da brisem postove, posto upozorenje ne uzimate za ozbiljno

                          Tema je RG.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Nego, kad Roleta ocekivati sutra na terenu ?
                            sigpic
                            "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
                            AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by maliajnstajn View Post
                              Nego, kad Roleta ocekivati sutra na terenu ?
                              2, pola 3. Tako nešto cijenim da bi moglo.

                              Comment


                              • Protivnik Schwartzman 3-0 za Role
                                OVAKO

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X