Tweet
Kakve veze ima sto nisam ja?
Nijedan forumas nije 'neki', svako ima svoj nick.
Nijedan forumas nije 'neki', svako ima svoj nick.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience. -
U Sloveniji se suska o tome da ce Djokovic i Sampras krajem septembra igrati egzibicioni mec u Ljubljani.
Comment
-
http://www.sarajevo-x.com/sport/tenis/clanak/110810130Originally posted by majabl View PostU Sloveniji se suska o tome da ce Djokovic i Sampras krajem septembra igrati egzibicioni mec u Ljubljani.Comment
-
Teniser sa najmanje mozga u istoriji - Markos BagdatisJedan je Obradovic Zarko!Comment
-
-
Bas bez konkurencije.Gori cirkuzant od Monfisa.Mnoooooogo precenjen teniser.Jedan je Obradovic Zarko!Comment
-
Ma on je slican Gulbisu kad hoce igrati tad je TOP 10 igrac,a u vecini slucajeva kad NE ZELI igrati tad ga tuce ko hoce
Comment
-
Nije on cirkuzant, on samo nume, sto bi rekao tuta
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Takve najvise mrzim.Originally posted by hamza_TM87 View PostMa on je slican Gulbisu kad hoce igrati tad je TOP 10 igrac,a u vecini slucajeva kad NE ZELI igrati tad ga tuce ko hoce
Jedan je Obradovic Zarko!Comment
-
Evo koliko je los Baggy bio kad mu je tenis bio prioritet,lako je pljuvati po igracu koji nije u formi ili mu se ne igra sto se moglo videti protiv Iznera ali ga potcenjivati na nacin da ima najmanje mozga ,ili je precenjen je u najmanju ruku nefer prema bivsem finalisti AO i koga je sve pobedio u tim mecevima takve igrace na jednom turniru zaredom nije pobedio ni Federer u svojih 16 GS
Australian Open, Australia; 16.01.2006; GS; Outdoor: Hard; Draw: 128
Round Opponent Ranking Score R128 Justin Gimelstob (USA) 115 W 7-6(6), 7-5, 6-0 Stats R64 Radek Stepanek (CZE) 20 W 6-4, 6-3, 3-6, 0-6, 7-5 Stats R32 Denis Gremelmayr (GER) 177 W 6-2, 6-1, 6-2 Stats R16 Andy Roddick (USA) 3 W 6-4, 1-6, 6-3, 6-4 Stats Q Ivan Ljubicic (CRO) 8 W 6-4, 6-2, 4-6, 3-6, 6-3 Stats S David Nalbandian (ARG) 4 W 3-6, 5-7, 6-3, 6-4, 6-4 Stats F Roger Federer (SUI) 1 L 7-5, 5-7, 0-6, 2-6 Stats Comment
-
Pa da je Federer pobedio 3.,4. i 8. na jednom turniru onda bi stvarno bio supermen, posto je to nemoguce.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Sta te muci?Originally posted by Duka View PostPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpicComment
-
Evo jednog lepog primera supermena Federera kako se osvaja GS protiv strasno teskih protivnika i Baggy bi osvojio Wimbledon;)Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostPa da je Federer pobedio 3.,4. i 8. na jednom turniru onda bi stvarno bio supermen, posto je to nemoguce.
Wimbledon, England; 21.06.2004; GS; Outdoor: Grass; Draw: 128
Round Opponent Ranking Score R128 Alex Bogdanovic (GBR) 295 W 6-3, 6-3, 6-0 Stats R64 Alejandro Falla (COL) 138 W 6-1, 6-2, 6-0 Stats R32 Thomas Johansson (SWE) 123 W 6-3, 6-4, 6-3 Stats R16 Ivo Karlovic (CRO) 62 W 6-3, 7-6(3), 7-6(5) Stats Q Lleyton Hewitt (AUS) 10 W 6-1, 6-7(1), 6-0, 6-4 Stats S Sebastien Grosjean (FRA) 13 W 6-2, 6-3, 7-6(6) Stats W Andy Roddick (USA) 2 W 4-6, 7-5, 7-6(3), 6-4 Stats Comment
-
@Boki969 Niko njega nije podcijenio fino sam rekao kada hoec da igra moze pobijediti bilo koga,a igraci koji su teniski profesionalci a tenis im nije prioritet po meni nemaju mozga!Comment
-
Idemo ponovo, sve u krugPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpicComment
Comment