Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Australian Open 2017. - Uzivo komentarisanje meceva

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Velikiajnstajn View Post
    Sto ga vise podcjenjujete to su sve vece sanse.
    Ja ne potcenjujem njegov sampionski mentalitet, ali igracki jednostavno trenutno nije dovoljno dobar, sto ne znaci da nece cak i do finala otici.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • A sto se tice Monfilsa, lik zasluzuje podjednak tretman u medijima kao i Kirijos, to je taj nivo
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
        A sto se tice Monfilsa, lik zasluzuje podjednak tretman u medijima kao i Kirijos, to je taj nivo
        Ni blizu,Monfis je itekako ozbiljan za Kirijosa.
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

        Comment


        • Izvesno da Gael nije neki reper ali je delom pokazao kakve probleme može imati Nadal na ovoj podlozi sa brzim i ravnim udarcima. Podsećanja radi takvi Raonićevi.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • Originally posted by MareLFC View Post
            Ni blizu,Monfis je itekako ozbiljan za Kirijosa.
            Nije, drugaciji jeste, ali su u sustini isti, prave cirkus na terenu.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              Ja ne potcenjujem njegov sampionski mentalitet, ali igracki jednostavno trenutno nije dovoljno dobar, sto ne znaci da nece cak i do finala otici.
              Nadalu je bitno da se kako ume i zna dokopa finala. Ako to uradi titula je njegova.
              Sa druge strane Federer je vec u finalu - nema do finala od koga da izgubi - i onda treba da moli boga da ga tamo ne saceka Nadal (ako cemo da cepidlacimo Federer ce biti taj koji ceka jer ce njegov mec biti zavrsen dan ranije ali ovako je nekako lepse ). Ako ga saceka bilo ko sem Nadala - titula je njegova, ako ga saceka Nadal - jos jedna propustena sansa za punoletstvo.
              Svakako ce biti zanimljivo.
              sigpic

              Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

              U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
              Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
                Nadalu je bitno da se kako ume i zna dokopa finala. Ako to uradi titula je njegova.
                Sa druge strane Federer je vec u finalu - nema do finala od koga da izgubi - i onda treba da moli boga da ga tamo ne saceka Nadal (ako cemo da cepidlacimo Federer ce biti taj koji ceka jer ce njegov mec biti zavrsen dan ranije ali ovako je nekako lepse ). Ako ga saceka bilo ko sem Nadala - titula je njegova, ako ga saceka Nadal - jos jedna propustena sansa za punoletstvo.
                Svakako ce biti zanimljivo.
                Ne znam samo otkud ti to da je Fed u finalu
                I da kazemo da ima lakse QF, posle toga ga ceka ili Stan ili Conga, obojica vise nego sposobni da ga dobiju i obojica su ga dobijali na slemovima.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • А где је ту Димитров?
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Zika View Post
                    А где је ту Димитров?
                    Tu je i vrlo opasan.
                    1. Andrey Rublev
                    2. Thanasi Kokkinakis
                    3. Alexander Zverev
                    4. Ernesto Escobedo

                    Renesansa tenisa u 2016 godini.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                      Ne znam samo otkud ti to da je Fed u finalu
                      I da kazemo da ima lakse QF, posle toga ga ceka ili Stan ili Conga, obojica vise nego sposobni da ga dobiju i obojica su ga dobijali na slemovima.
                      Stan moze da ga dobije jedino na sljaci, tako da u koliko organizatori ne promene naprasno podlogu pred njihov mec, onda mozda i ima neke sanse. A za Congu cemo da vidimo.
                      sigpic

                      Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                      U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                      Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                      Comment


                      • јао Мекенро је лудак, као плаче од среће што је победио његов заборављени стил, обожава Мишу, сузе....
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
                          Nadalu je bitno da se kako ume i zna dokopa finala. Ako to uradi titula je njegova.
                          Sa druge strane Federer je vec u finalu - nema do finala od koga da izgubi - i onda treba da moli boga da ga tamo ne saceka Nadal (ako cemo da cepidlacimo Federer ce biti taj koji ceka jer ce njegov mec biti zavrsen dan ranije ali ovako je nekako lepse ). Ako ga saceka bilo ko sem Nadala - titula je njegova, ako ga saceka Nadal - jos jedna propustena sansa za punoletstvo.
                          Svakako ce biti zanimljivo.
                          Ne treba potcenjivati ni Vavrinkinu hijena taktiku, da pusti favorite da se zasite i umore pa ukrade slem a i Dimitrov je solidan na ovoj podlozi, Miloš blagi favorit ako je zdrav, dosta otvoren turnir.
                          Last edited by Dekson; 23-01-17, 13:26.
                          Lako je uvek pogadjati u centar ako imaš ljude da crtaju krugove oko njega

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            Nije, drugaciji jeste, ali su u sustini isti, prave cirkus na terenu.
                            Monfisov cirkus ne moze da se poredi sa cirkusom koji pravi Kirijos.Nick pravi vestacke svadje,provocira,vredja ljude...
                            Originally posted by Casiraghi
                            Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
                            Originally posted by Casiraghi
                            Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
                            Originally posted by Casiraghi
                            Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by MareLFC View Post
                              Monfisov cirkus ne moze da se poredi sa cirkusom koji pravi Kirijos.Nick pravi vestacke svadje,provocira,vredja ljude...
                              U sustini je isto, ovaj pravi cirkus od teniskog meca i ne postuje publiku koja je tu dosla i to tako vec 10 godina
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Ne znam zasto svi misle da ce Rodja lako sa Stankom u polufinalu? Ja bas mislim da ce izgubiti, nece se Wawrinka predati bez borbe a Rodja i dalje nije konstantan tokom celog meca. Sa druge strane mislim da ce Raona dobiti Nadala. On je danas igrao mozda najlosiji mec na AO, lai uspeo da dobije. Tesko ce mu se ponoviti 2 puta ista igra. Grisa je preopasan. Istina, otvorio mu se zreb dosta i mislim da moze da dobije Goffana bez nekih preteranih muka. u polufinalu je sve moguce ali ponovicu se po 10-ti put Stanko-Raonic finale
                                Dreams are coming true.


                                Marcello Lippi: „Usporeni snimci akcija nisu realan fudbal. Svi mi želimo da vidimo Moniku Beluči golu, ali ne želimo da je gledamo kroz rendgen“.

                                Comment

                                Working...