Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Miami 2015.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by NI View Post
    Naravno da ne moze. Znacaj turnira je bitan. Ali je bitno i ko je protivnik. Ne mislis da mec protiv Bagdatisa ili Filipusisa moze biti ravan mecu sa top Novakom. Finale Dubaia u najboljem slucaju, zato sto je sa Novakom i za to sto je u igri H2H moze biti u rangu masters meca.

    Ja pricam o statistici. Ono sto su igraci, koji nisu potuno motivisani kao na GS-u, statisticki pokazali.
    Da li bi tvrdio to isto da se igralo u tri dobijena seta,verovatno ne bi,jer Federer ne bi izdrzao taj intenzitet,o tome ti pricam,mecevi u tri seta su potpuno druga dimenzija bez obzira protiv koga igra,ako gledamo samo meceve u dva dobijena mogu da se slozim
    Last edited by Srkisa; 06-04-15, 00:22.

    Comment


    • Mari ima strasan humor:

      Murray acknowledged his third-set shutout by tweeting, ''This egg today wasn't appreciated on Easter.''

      Comment


      • Izvini,NI,tek sad sam te razumeo statisicki sigurno moze biti najbolji

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Srkisa View Post
          Izvini,NI,tek sad sam te razumeo statisicki sigurno moze biti najbolji
          Nemoj da te to tangira. To se ja malo zekam sa Bojanom.

          Svi oni igraju fantasticno na treningu. Ali to se ne broji, broji se kad je bitno.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
            Sad kad ce Rafa ojaditi Novaka na RG-u, po 1000 put, bice veselje na ovom pdf-u.
            Veselje?! Možda kod par vas zadrtih nadalovaca ali sumnjam. Sva je prilika da će ovoga puta i on izvisiti.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BratBugarin View Post
              Veselje?! Možda kod par vas zadrtih nadalovaca ali sumnjam. Sva je prilika da će ovoga puta i on izvisiti.
              Trebao sam staviti "veselje" a ne veselje.

              Ne znam, zezam se samo, rano je za RG-u, a necu nista da prognoziram jer prosle sezone sam bio ubedjen da Novak to dobija jer sve faktore su ukazivale na to, a on se tek tako ugasio nakon dobijeni prvi set, po meni potpuno neshvatljivo. Ja se i dalje cudim kako je Nadal osvoijo taj RG sa onakvom jadnom igrom.
              OVAKO

              Comment


              • http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id...le-andy-murray
                sigpic

                Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                Comment


                • Originally posted by NI View Post
                  Nemoj da te to tangira. To se ja malo zekam sa Bojanom.

                  Svi oni igraju fantasticno na treningu. Ali to se ne broji, broji se kad je bitno.
                  Ne znam o kakvom zezanju ti pricas, kad ti najozbiljnije mislis da je to Fedov najbolji mec karijere
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • "...but neither of those two men had to compete with Djokovic, Nadal, Federer or Murray, four of the greatest men to pick up a racket who have somehow been thrown together to snarl across the net at each other in his golden era of tennis...."



                    neko dobije platu za ovakav tekst

                    Comment


                    • Da li je moguce da ljudi i dalje smatraju Mareja delom velike cetvorke?

                      Ustvari ispravka, ne postoji velika cetvorka, nego velika trojka + Marej + ostali
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Ne znam o kakvom zezanju ti pricas, kad ti najozbiljnije mislis da je to Fedov najbolji mec karijere
                        U konkurenciji od dva dobijena mora biti jedan od njaboljih. U svakom slucaju to je mec u kojem je pobijdio najboljeg protivnika. (Uzimam formu i znanje.) Valjda se i ti moras sloziti sa time.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by NI View Post
                          U konkurenciji od dva dobijena mora biti jedan od njaboljih. U svakom slucaju to je mec u kojem je pobijdio najboljeg protivnika. (Uzimam formu i znanje.) Valjda se i ti moras sloziti sa time.
                          Ja ti rekoh da te vise ozbiljno ne shvatam, mislila sam da si onda u afektu tako nesto izjavio, ali ti i posle mesec danas isto tvrdis.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            Ja ti rekoh da te vise ozbiljno ne shvatam, mislila sam da si onda u afektu tako nesto izjavio, ali ti i posle mesec danas isto tvrdis.
                            Bojana,

                            Postavi neki drugi mec u dva dobijena, pa da usporedimo. Nesto sa Agasijem ili Nalbandianom, mozda sa Rafaom.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by NI View Post
                              Bojana,

                              Postavi neki drugi mec u dva dobijena, pa da usporedimo. Nesto sa Agasijem ili Nalbandianom, mozda sa Rafaom.
                              Ne pada mi napamet, posto ti slepo gledas statisticke podatke i njima verujes, a ne gledas nivo tenisa koji nijedna statistka ne moze da docara.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Craig O'Shannessy je po obicaju dobar:

                                http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Ten...ic-Murray.aspx

                                Njavaznije:

                                Murray Approaching

                                Murray was swarming the net early in the match, coming forward six times in the opening three games, which helped get the break of serve for 2-1. Leading into the Miami final, Murray was winning 77 percent of his approach points, but could only manage 48 percent (12/25) against Djokovic. Importantly, he only won 20 percent (1/5) in the second set, which he won, showing he was grinding far more at the back of the court, depleting his energy reserves to level the score at a set all.
                                To je sustina. Lakse je napadati protiv Berdiha, Andersona itd. nego protiv Novaka. Ako osvajas samo 48% kada ides na mrezu, to nije pobjednicka taktika. Alternativa? Da smara sa osnovne. Onda se iscrpi. Za Marija je tesko naci kvadraturu tog kruga.
                                Last edited by NI; 06-04-15, 09:59.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X