Originally posted by NI
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miami 2015.
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Srkisa; 06-04-15, 00:22.
-
-
Originally posted by BratBugarin View PostVeselje?! Možda kod par vas zadrtih nadalovaca ali sumnjam. Sva je prilika da će ovoga puta i on izvisiti.
Ne znam, zezam se samo, rano je za RG-u, a necu nista da prognoziram jer prosle sezone sam bio ubedjen da Novak to dobija jer sve faktore su ukazivale na to, a on se tek tako ugasio nakon dobijeni prvi set, po meni potpuno neshvatljivo. Ja se i dalje cudim kako je Nadal osvoijo taj RG sa onakvom jadnom igrom.OVAKO
Comment
-
sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostNemoj da te to tangira. To se ja malo zekam sa Bojanom.
Svi oni igraju fantasticno na treningu. Ali to se ne broji, broji se kad je bitno.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
"...but neither of those two men had to compete with Djokovic, Nadal, Federer or Murray, four of the greatest men to pick up a racket who have somehow been thrown together to snarl across the net at each other in his golden era of tennis...."
neko dobije platu za ovakav tekst
Comment
-
Da li je moguce da ljudi i dalje smatraju Mareja delom velike cetvorke?
Ustvari ispravka, ne postoji velika cetvorka, nego velika trojka + Marej + ostalihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostNe znam o kakvom zezanju ti pricas, kad ti najozbiljnije mislis da je to Fedov najbolji mec karijere
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostU konkurenciji od dva dobijena mora biti jedan od njaboljih. U svakom slucaju to je mec u kojem je pobijdio najboljeg protivnika. (Uzimam formu i znanje.) Valjda se i ti moras sloziti sa time.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostJa ti rekoh da te vise ozbiljno ne shvatam, mislila sam da si onda u afektu tako nesto izjavio, ali ti i posle mesec danas isto tvrdis.
Postavi neki drugi mec u dva dobijena, pa da usporedimo. Nesto sa Agasijem ili Nalbandianom, mozda sa Rafaom.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostBojana,
Postavi neki drugi mec u dva dobijena, pa da usporedimo. Nesto sa Agasijem ili Nalbandianom, mozda sa Rafaom.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Craig O'Shannessy je po obicaju dobar:
http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Ten...ic-Murray.aspx
Njavaznije:
Murray Approaching
Murray was swarming the net early in the match, coming forward six times in the opening three games, which helped get the break of serve for 2-1. Leading into the Miami final, Murray was winning 77 percent of his approach points, but could only manage 48 percent (12/25) against Djokovic. Importantly, he only won 20 percent (1/5) in the second set, which he won, showing he was grinding far more at the back of the court, depleting his energy reserves to level the score at a set all.Last edited by NI; 06-04-15, 09:59.
Comment
Comment