ATP - Rafael Nadal

[MareLFC]

Sutra očekujem pobedu za Rafu ali u svakom slučaju morat če igrati svoj najbolji tenis.

4.brzina (kako protiv Edmunda u 2.stu, Schwarzmana set i po, te prvih 6 gemova proti Gofina) protiv takvih igrača što je Ramos Vinolas neče biti dovoljan za pobedu. Rafa mora da več od pečetka igra na full.

Nema Ramos cime da ga ugrozi, ocekujem dosta 30+ razmena i jednu rutinsku pobedu.

[Mrkela]

Ono kad si hard core Realovac, a centralni teniski teren u Barceloni se zove po tebi.

Satisfaction

9 Time Barcelona Open Champion Rafael Nadal to receive honor of center court renamed after him.
The court will be called Rafa Nadal. Effective Immediately!

[jacques9]

Ono kad si hard core Realovac, a centralni teniski teren u Barceloni se zove po tebi.

Satisfaction

9 Time Barcelona Open Champion Rafael Nadal to receive honor of center court renamed after him.
The court will be called Rafa Nadal. Effective Immediately!

Zamisli, da Rafa postane neki dan predsednik FC Real Madrida ili dobije kakvu bitnu fuknciju u Real Madridu.

Katalonski ponos bio bi uništen.

[colchonero]

Ocekujem laku pobedu danas nesto tipa 6-2 6-2. Uglavnom 2-0

[colchonero]

Dobro rasporedio je gemove drugacije, ali 4 gema po ocekivanju. Svaka cast majstore!!

[E1_PG]

Dobro rasporedio je gemove drugacije, ali 4 gema po ocekivanju. Svaka cast majstore!!

Bravo Madrid,bio si optimista.Bolje da nastavimo ovako ja cu da hejtujem malo ti hvali Nadala mozda je to dobitna kombinacija.

[MareLFC]

Istorijska titula, bravo majstore!

[colchonero]

Bravo Madrid,bio si optimista.Bolje da nastavimo ovako ja cu da hejtujem malo ti hvali Nadala mozda je to dobitna kombinacija.

Moze naravno, samo da bude titula, mislim da smo svi srecni i optimisti i pesimisti.

[torpedo]

Čestitam

[Marija81]

Čestitke ljudi

[NI]

Rafa se vratio. Igra mu je u uzlaznoj putanji. Uz to sve bolje inkorporira igru na mrezi.

Sad je po kladionicama prvi favorit za RG sa 35%. Slijedi Novak sa 20%.

[Velikiajnstajn]

Nije jos ni blizu potencijalnog maksimuma, ali dobra sedmica. Kretanje manje vise, ali je forhend bio dublji, a i serva pristojna.

Samo sto vise da se napada i nema zime

[jacques9]

Sa pobedama i titulama raste samopouzdanje.

A tek je početak sezone na šljaci. Samo da bude zdravje ok i forma če biti sve bolja.

Primjetio sam da je Rafa ima negativan score u 9+ razmjenama protiv Schwarzmana in protiv Ramosa.

Znači treba još popraviti kondiciji i kretanje.

Protivnici po pravilu zadnih nekoliko godina pokušavaju Rafu napadati na FH stranu. Treba još puno raditi i na tom elementu - znači popraviti FH laso u defenzivi, da mu lopte ne bude plitke.

[jacques9]

Brain Game: Nadal Keeps It Short For Monte-Carlo Title
Rafael Nadal is a master illusionist.
He makes us think he dominates the longer rallies. He makes us focus on his athletic side-to-side movement. We see the “Spanish X” practice drill when he competes, moving up and back in the Deuce and Ad court, hitting a medley of forehands and backhands. It's all just an illusion.
Rafael Nadal defeated Albert Ramos-Vinolas 6-1, 6-3 in the final of the Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters on Sunday by dominating the short points en route to winning a record-setting 10th Monaco title in just 76 minutes.
You would naturally think that two Spanish clay-court specialists competing at sea-level on a cool, overcast afternoon would grind and grind, and grind some more. This match simply didn’t materialise that way.
There were 45 points (48%) played in the crucial 0-4 rally length, with Nadal winning 32 of them to just 13 for Ramos Vinolas. You can look deeper into the match stats to try and figure out what happened, but these numbers leap off the score sheet more than anything else.
When the rally ended between five and nine shots, Nadal was basically twice as good as his Spanish counterpart. Nadal won 18 points in this secondary rally length to just 10 for Ramos-Vinolas.
Clay-court tennis is simply not what it used to be. Owning the longer points used to be the domain of three-time Monte Carlo champion Bjorn Borg. Thomas Muster also won Monte Carlo three times in the ‘90s with the same bruising baseline strategy. Longer used to be the norm. Today’s clay-court game represents a different era - a game style focused on the front end of the point rather than the back.
Nothing more illustrates this new dynamic than Ramos-Vinolas only winning four games in two sets against Nadal, but winning the longer rallies of 9+ shots 12-8. Ramos-Vinolas said in his post-match interview about Nadal that “he is a little bit better in everything.” The statistics prove otherwise. Ramos-Vinolas was actually better in the longer points, but there were not enough of them to make an impact.
The Nadal forehand was the difference-maker, accounting for 12 winners while yielding just eight unforced errors. He was constantly looking to hit a run-around forehand in the Deuce court, turning a good backhand into a more explosive forehand.
What’s so interesting is that Nadal’s average groundstroke speed in the final was less than Ramos-Vinolas - 119km/h to 122km/h. Hitting a bigger ball is obviously just part of the overall equation. Nadal also ran more for the match (1499m to 1386m), highlighting that dictating the point does not directly equate to less movement.
Ramos-Vinolas desperately needed to have one of the best serve days of his life to be competitive with Nadal, but only managed to make 56 per cent of his first serves. Nadal made 76 per cent to create yet another area of influence. Nadal backed it up by winning 70 per cent of his second-serve points, to Ramos Vinolas’ 43 per cent.
Superiority in clay-court tennis is basically identical to that on hard or grass courts: dominate the short points and walk away with the silverware.

[7eleven]

Brain Game: Nadal Keeps It Short For Monte-Carlo Title
Rafael Nadal is a master illusionist.
He makes us think he dominates the longer rallies. He makes us focus on his athletic side-to-side movement. We see the “Spanish X” practice drill when he competes, moving up and back in the Deuce and Ad court, hitting a medley of forehands and backhands. It's all just an illusion.
Rafael Nadal defeated Albert Ramos-Vinolas 6-1, 6-3 in the final of the Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters on Sunday by dominating the short points en route to winning a record-setting 10th Monaco title in just 76 minutes.
You would naturally think that two Spanish clay-court specialists competing at sea-level on a cool, overcast afternoon would grind and grind, and grind some more. This match simply didn’t materialise that way.
There were 45 points (48%) played in the crucial 0-4 rally length, with Nadal winning 32 of them to just 13 for Ramos Vinolas. You can look deeper into the match stats to try and figure out what happened, but these numbers leap off the score sheet more than anything else.
When the rally ended between five and nine shots, Nadal was basically twice as good as his Spanish counterpart. Nadal won 18 points in this secondary rally length to just 10 for Ramos-Vinolas.
Clay-court tennis is simply not what it used to be. Owning the longer points used to be the domain of three-time Monte Carlo champion Bjorn Borg. Thomas Muster also won Monte Carlo three times in the ‘90s with the same bruising baseline strategy. Longer used to be the norm. Today’s clay-court game represents a different era - a game style focused on the front end of the point rather than the back.
Nothing more illustrates this new dynamic than Ramos-Vinolas only winning four games in two sets against Nadal, but winning the longer rallies of 9+ shots 12-8. Ramos-Vinolas said in his post-match interview about Nadal that “he is a little bit better in everything.” The statistics prove otherwise. Ramos-Vinolas was actually better in the longer points, but there were not enough of them to make an impact.
The Nadal forehand was the difference-maker, accounting for 12 winners while yielding just eight unforced errors. He was constantly looking to hit a run-around forehand in the Deuce court, turning a good backhand into a more explosive forehand.
What’s so interesting is that Nadal’s average groundstroke speed in the final was less than Ramos-Vinolas - 119km/h to 122km/h. Hitting a bigger ball is obviously just part of the overall equation. Nadal also ran more for the match (1499m to 1386m), highlighting that dictating the point does not directly equate to less movement.
Ramos-Vinolas desperately needed to have one of the best serve days of his life to be competitive with Nadal, but only managed to make 56 per cent of his first serves. Nadal made 76 per cent to create yet another area of influence. Nadal backed it up by winning 70 per cent of his second-serve points, to Ramos Vinolas’ 43 per cent.
Superiority in clay-court tennis is basically identical to that on hard or grass courts: dominate the short points and walk away with the silverware.

Čestitke Nadalu na odbrani MC izvuko se protiv Gofana izbacio Vinjolasa koji su mu izbacili Wawrinku i Andy-ja

Ali 10 titula u MC-u ima teżinu nadam se da će nastaviti s dobrim tenisom


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro