Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pa forum je inace prepun Konorsovih i Lendlovih, bas me cudi sto se ne prepucavaju
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Dve veoma izjednacene karijere, gotovo do promila.. Konors ima jedan mali Mejdzor ali i vise pobeda i titula, Lendl je sa druge strane dominantna figura zlatne teniske decenije i sinonim za rad i disciplinu. Obojici je jedna podloga problem i ostvarili su slican ucinak u svim uslovima igranja

      Vec poprilican broj dana pricamo o njima a niko nijednom nije pomenuo da je Lendl pobedio Konorsa u 17 vezanih meceva, sto mi se svidja jer ne predstavlja pravu sliku

      Sinoc sam ekspresno zavrsio finale Vimbldona iz 1999., sa velikim zadovoljstvom radim meceve u kojima nema odugovalcenja, peskira ili bilo kakvog taktiziranja. Treba da sredim statistike za sva tri seta i onu ukupnu, postavljam ga posle podne
      Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

      sigpic

      Comment


      • Ne želim da procenjujem ko je bolji, Lendl mi je draži ..

        Comment


        • Tačno, od ja mslm, '84 (ili 85) Ivan nije izgubio niti jedan meč HtH. Ali sa druge strane je na početku svoje karijere, Ivan bio redovna mušterija Jimbu (ako se ne varam)

          Jimbo je bio čovek koji je moga da gubi 20, i da server ima meč loptu i da i u toj situaciji krene u preokret. Motivacija mu je bila jedna od najjačih na turu

          Comment


          • Prle, CW, mec je skinut
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Odlicno.. sutra imam veoma vazne obaveze ali mozda se vec preko vikenda registrujem pa da krene skidanje
              Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

              sigpic

              Comment


              • Samo javi, da ti posaljem invite ;)
                a mozete obojica da skidate u isto vreme, povecacu ja dozvoljeni upload
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Preko cega vi to skidate
                  There's something wrong with me chemically
                  Something wrong with me inherently
                  The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                  I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                  It was the wrong plan
                  In the wrong hands
                  With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                  The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                  The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                  Comment


                  • preko torenata, ali zatvorenih, tako da ti treba invite da pristupis tom forumu
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Jbg nije moj net brz. Sada uglavnom svi imaju po 16 mb.
                      There's something wrong with me chemically
                      Something wrong with me inherently
                      The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                      I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                      It was the wrong plan
                      In the wrong hands
                      With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                      The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                      The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Samo javi, da ti posaljem invite ;)
                        a mozete obojica da skidate u isto vreme, povecacu ja dozvoljeni upload
                        Može li se odmah početi sa skidanjem ? Hvala Bojana još jednom, jedva čekam da ga ponovno pregledam. Analizu možda neću moći uraditi u skorije vrijeme, ali biće valjda do nove godine.

                        Konors ili Lendl ?! Ipak Lendl, iako nemam sada vremena da obrazložim svoj stav.
                        “It's no accident, I think, that tennis uses the language of life. Advantage, service, fault, break, love, the basic elements of tennis are those of everyday existence, because every match is a life in miniature. Points become games become sets become tournaments, and it's all so tightly connected that any point can become the turning point. It reminds me of the way seconds become minutes become hours, and any hour can be our finest. Or darkest. It's our choice.”

                        Comment


                        • 1999 Wimbledon Final - Pete Sampras vs Andre Agassi 6-3 6-4 7-5





                          http://www.profesionalnitenis.com/fi...i-6-3-6-4-7-5/
                          Last edited by ClayWarrior; 25-10-12, 22:29.
                          Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • Ovde cu posle staviti kljucne stvari i mozda neku pricu vezanu za mec, ova statistika iscrpi i vise mi je trebalo za nju nego za gledanje meca
                            Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Prle! View Post
                              Može li se odmah početi sa skidanjem ? Hvala Bojana još jednom, jedva čekam da ga ponovno pregledam. Analizu možda neću moći uraditi u skorije vrijeme, ali biće valjda do nove godine.

                              Konors ili Lendl ?! Ipak Lendl, iako nemam sada vremena da obrazložim svoj stav.
                              Prle, normalno da moze
                              a moracu i ja da nadjem vremena da odgledam taj mec, kad sam ga vec skidala da vidim bas kakav je bio
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Obradio sam Bekera.

                                Po ocekivanju je daleko iza Lendla.

                                Ispravljeni Beker
                                Godina A B
                                1983 0 0
                                1984 0 285
                                1985 158 5240
                                1986 284 6335
                                1987 57 3550
                                1988 159 6110
                                1989 422 8145
                                1990 87 5790
                                1991 171 5720
                                1992 77 4054
                                1993 25 1840
                                1994 52 4650
                                1995 31 4605
                                1996 356 5855
                                1997 0 605
                                1998 0 300
                                1999 0 215
                                Last edited by NI; 15-10-12, 13:11.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X