Ma smiješno. Prvo po mraku je nemoguće vratiti servis? Sudijske greške su vrlo moguće? Ma šega...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Ivan bg View PostEvo moje liste Vladane ;)
Servis: Federer
Bekhend: Djokovic, Nalbandijan
Forhend: Federer
Ritern: Djokovic, Marej
Volej: Federer
DS: Djokovic, Federer
Noge: Djokovic, Nadal
Snaga: Nadal
Psiha: Djokovic, Nadal
Lob: Nalbandijan, Hjuit
A Fed se kasno sjetio da u tenisu postoji i dropsigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostJa sam za lob stavio Murray,ali vjerovatno Lleyton ima najbolji od aktivnih tenisera ;)
A Fed se kasno sjetio da u tenisu postoji i drop
Mozda se kasno setio, ali ga izvodi savrseno. Nema sta majstor, on moze sve ;)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostJa sam za lob stavio Murray,ali vjerovatno Lleyton ima najbolji od aktivnih tenisera ;)
A Fed se kasno sjetio da u tenisu postoji i drophttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ivan bg View PostDa, on je ranije govorio da je to znak slabosti.
Mozda se kasno setio, ali ga izvodi savrseno. Nema sta majstor, on moze sve ;)sigpic
Comment
-
Ma simpatican je meni Roger,kada je izgubio tragicno ono finale protiv Nadala na RG-u citav turnir igra DS,a onda u finalu 1,al vazno je da je i tada Mats imao skandalozne najave pisanja istorije ITAKOTO(sto bi Tuta rekao)Last edited by AK47; 07-04-11, 22:54.Zeljko Malnar-Nocna mora <3
#the return
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ivan bg View PostPa dobro, da nije bilo i nekih drugih stvari ne bo osvojio RG, ali necemo sada o tome
Je l' pobedio 7 protivnika?
Je l' mu je mozda neko predao neki mec pa je samo zbog toga prosao dalje?
Njegova titula je validna koliko i svaka druga.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
pa zašto nećemo?
eto,imao je sreće da mu se sklope sve kockice..
kao što je i Nadal imao sreće za W..Originally posted by gokaraValjda ćemo dočekati dan da kloniraju Federera pa da možemo da ne gasimo televizore kad igraju svi koji nisu Federer i uživamo u meču Federer-Federer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostA zasto se njegova titula uvek dovodi u pitanje, sa sbbkbb raspravama?
Je l' pobedio 7 protivnika?
Je l' mu je mozda neko predao neki mec pa je samo zbog toga prosao dalje?
Njegova titula je validna koliko i svaka druga.
Rodzer je to i vise nego zasluzio ;)
Comment
-
Ovo sam sad procitala na forumu rf.com-a
I just heard from Rome tournament director on italian tennis TV this year Rome "will be very fast. Less clay and speedy balls. It's a pity Roger Federer couldn't win this tournament so far. We want him to win".http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment