Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

[DinoFC]

Zar ne zelis da bodovanje za vrijeme pandemije bude sto vjerodostojnije onome na koje smo navikli ako to zelite onda ne prizivajte da Rublev bude no.3. Jednostavno.
To je premali uzorak turnira da bi se na osnovu njega pravila lista i zbog toga se i ne skidaju poeni sa razlogom. I ostali igraci se nisu ravnali po toj listi i da su se prema njoj ravnali mozda bi igrali te 500-tice sto ih je Rublev osvojio

[bojanaBG]

Kakvo iznenadjenje

[MareLFC]

Pa nije sistem bas tako lako prevarit. To nikada ne bi bilo moguce da se desi izvan korone. Dolazimo do tog da on hoce zbog pande da napreduje

Po Race listi je trenutno treći.
Nema rezultate na GS i mastersima kao što si naveo, ali ima bolesno dobar kontinuitet i konstantnost, ja ga očekujem ove godine u top 5 i sa ovakvim računanjem.

[bojanaBG]

Nazalost slazem se sa Dinom sto se tice Dzumhura. Nedopustiovo ponasanje na terenu, i nema opravdanja za tako nesto. Takodje su me Visko i Govedarica razocarali u svojoj emisiji pricajuci o njemu. Bukvalno su ga branili . Razumem ja njih da im je tesko da budu realni u takvoj situaciji posto znaju Dzumhura, ali onda je bolje da uopste ne pricaju o tome. Takodje mi je Visko iznenadio sto je branio trenutni sistem bodovanja, koji je jasno svima jako los.

Mene oni najvise nerviraju kad pricaju kako Federer stalno preskace sljaku, juce Govedarica odvali da je preskocio 5,6 puta RG
Slusam ih skoro redovno, ali cesto znaju bas da odvale...

[DinoFC]

Ja pokusavam na silu da mi se svidi ona emisija sa Viskom i Govedaricom ali nikako mi ne uspijeva. Tako da pogledam bas ako me neki gost privuce.
Govedarica prica previse sablonski i bukvalno nista ne kaze i dosta umara kad prica. Tako da njega vecinom premotavam jer znam da nista konkretno necu cuti.

Dok Visko to malo vadi ali iskreno nista specijalno.

[miloolja]

Zavisi od gosta, ali ona posle AO je bila odlicna, fina analiza od obojice, kao i sledeca sa Pralicom i Viskom povodom Noksijevih 311 nedelja.
Vec sledecu na veliki jubilej #312 nisam mogla da gledam sa Obradovicem.

[talicni]

on dok je branio sistem, da bi bio politicki korektan valjda, isti je bio katastrofa za noleta. stopirane mu sedmice a poeni iz 2019 trebali da trajuj godinu i po a njegovo ciscenje svega pred stopiranje tura 2020 (ATPkup-AO-dubai=3165p) bi se racunao samo pola godine. bas i ocigledno na njegovu stetu. ako vec zasticujes poene iz 2019, uradi to i sa onim sa pocetka 2020. a ne, kako je tada trebalo biti, da poeni iz 2019. traju godinu i po, pa ovi sa pocetka 2020. samo pola godine, pa onda ide normala od godinu dana. za noleta daleko najlosija moguca kombinacija u tom momentu. i naravno veze nije imala sa pravednoscu i cak se i kosila sa pravilnikom po kojem turnirski poeni traju 52 sedmice.

[bojanaBG]

Zavisi od gosta, ali ona posle AO je bila odlicna, fina analiza od obojice, kao i sledeca sa Pralicom i Viskom povodom Noksijevih 311 nedelja.
Vec sledecu na veliki jubilej #312 nisam migla da gledam sa Obradovicem.

Emisija bi bila milion puta bolja da stalno vode Visko i Pralica, mnogo su opusteniji i prirodniji.

[DinoFC]

Emisija bi bila milion puta bolja da stalno vode Visko i Pralica, mnogo su opusteniji i prirodniji.

Jeste. U dosta situacija kad Govedarica oduzi bespotrebno bukvalno ono Visko u fazonu "jes, jes" samo zavrsi sa pricom. I onda objasni ustvari konkretnije i konciznije to o cemu je pricao Govedarica.

[147]

Video sam da je bilo price o Rubljovu. On je inace odlican igrac, ali mora da postoje neki limiti koliko poena moze za se skupi na ovim manjim turnirima. Limit koji je pre postojao od 7 turnira( sem 8 obaveznih mastersa i 4 slema) je sasvim ok. Po tome bi Rus vec imao maksimalan broj poena na tim manjim turnirima i dzabe bi igrao ove turnire. Medjutim posto je sada "specijalna situacija" on moze da krcka koliko god hoce poena na turnirima iz serije 500 i napreduje na taj nacin na listi. Nije posteno sto je tako. On treba da pobedjuje najbolje igrace na najvecim turnirma i tako da napreduje. Ako to ne moze da uradi ( kao sto do sada nije mogao), ovo sto je sada postigao na rankingu treba da bude maksimum. Inace pogledajte njegov raspored poena ovde https://www.atptour.com/en/players/a...ings-breakdown.

[bojanaBG]

Vidis, nisam ni videla kakav mu je raspored poena...
Inace, Rubljov igra Majami, pa nedelju Marbelja/Kaljari pa MC, sto znaci da je jedino preskocio nedelju izmedju AO i Roterdama

[talicni]

https://wwos.nine.com.au/tennis/atp-...5-857666d5e97c

Roger Federer the big winner from ATP's latest world rankings change

Roger Federer stands to be one of the biggest beneficiaries after the ATP announced yet more changes to the way the world rankings are calculated.

The tour has confirmed an extension of the 'Best Of' system through until the end of August, for tournaments that weren't played in 2020 due to the pandemic shutdown, with points from the equivalent 2019 event counted at 50 percent of their value.

Federer has already announced his withdrawal from this year's Miami Masters, but will still be able to count 500 rankings points, courtesy of his win there in 2019.

And he's also guaranteed at least 600 points from his 2019 Wimbledon final appearance, regardless of his performance this year. That's a combined 1100 points from just two tournaments in 2019, as a comparison, Daniil Medvedev earned 1200 points for making the Australian Open final last month.

Federer is still ranked fifth in the world, despite the fact he hasn't played a competitive match in more than a year as he battles to overcome knee surgery.

Former Australian Open finalist Jo-Wilfried Tsonga is another who has benefitted. Despite not winning a tour-level match since October 2019, he's still ranked 66th in the world, ahead of Australia's Alexei Popyrin, who won the Singapore Open earlier this week.


Alexei Popyrin of Australia holds the winner's trophy after his victory in Men's Singles Final match against Alexander Bublik of Kazakhstan on day seven of the Singapore Tennis Open (Getty)
A back injury sidelined Tsonga for 13 months, but, like Federer, he retains his ranking on the basis of his performances in 2019.

Before the COVID hiatus in 2020, the ATP rankings system was based on a rolling 52-week period.

"If you're going to change the ranking system, then change it for good," former Australian Davis Cup player Sam Groth told Wide World of Sports.

"Don't just keep making adjustments as we go.

"It's going to help those at the top echelon stay there. That's who this change is protecting."

Groth noted that self-interest always wins out when changes are made.

"The tour's doing everything they can to survive and try to make it fair for players.

"The problem is the decision is made in consultation with the Player Council, representing the players.

"The representatives on the Player Council are generally ranked in the top 100.

"So, of course the decisions will help those players already in the top 100."

Federer was recently re-elected to the Player Council, along with fellow top-ranked players Rafael Nadal, John Millman and Felix Auger-Aliassime.

The WTA is yet to confirm if it will follow suit, with similar criticisms surrounding the women's rankings.

Australia's Ash Barty continues to hold the world No.1 ranking, despite the fact that Naomi Osaka is the reigning US and Australian Open champion.

Barty's successor as Roland Garros champion, Iga Swiatek, remains at number 15 in the rankings, despite recently winning a tournament in Adelaide to go with her French victory.
....

da (kako je jolita dobro primijetila) i ona odluka u posljednji cas da ostaju i poeni sa posljednjeg WTFa. gdje fed nije igrao a do posljednjeg trenutka je vazilo da bi ti poeni ispali pred naredni WTF, 2020 (kao i obicno). jos 400 spasenih poena za feda.

[bojanaBG]

Vecu glupost davno nisam procitala

Men's grand slams must be three sets - it is the only way to save Roger Federer and Andy Murray

It’s time to switch formats at the majors. By asking these grand old men to play best-of-five sets in every round, we will only usher them into retirement all the sooner. “That’s life,” you might say. “They’ve had their turn.” But the younger challengers would benefit from sharing the stage with them as equals. Or now, increasingly, as superiors.
My solution would prioritise skill over endurance in the first week of a slam. Both genders should play the less onerous best-of-three-set format until the fourth round, and then switch to best-of-five for the second week, just as the matches at snooker’s World Championships keep expanding on their way to a showpiece final.

Sreca, pa su komentari uglavnom: ne i ne, da li si normalan

[DinoFC]

Simon Briggs I šta ljudi plate da bi ovo čitali?! ahhahahahahhaha


Ono sto normalan insan ne bi pomislio tu su zluradi britanski novinari da naširoko objasne u članku.

[bojanaBG]

Ma mozes i da se registrujes, pa da par clanaka procitas besplatno, ko je lud ovo da placa