Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
pokupih sa jednog foruma, nadam se da je statistika tacna. ali po onome koliko sam ja pratio to je tako otprilike:
% of titles won by beating 3 top 5 players:
(PS po zrijebu je ovo vjerovatno samo na WTF turnirima, na drugima igracima od br1-4 moze biti moguce samo ako dobiju br5 u svojoj cetvrtini zreba (25% sansa) i br5 ne izgubi do QF a 1-4 do SF i F i to pod uslovom da svi top5 nastupaju na turniru, sve u svemu malo vjerovatno)
Fed: 6.8% (6 out of 88 titles)
Djoko: 6.3% (4 out of 63 titles)
Nadal: 2.9% (2 out of 67 titles)
% of titles won by beating 3 top 10 players:
Djoko: 28.5% (18)
Fed: 15.9% (14)
Nadal: 14.9% (10)
% of titles won by beating 3 top 20 players:
Djoko: 60.3% (38)
Nadal: 41.7% (28)
Fed: 39.7% (35)
% of titles won without beating a top 5 player:
Djoko: 33.3% (21)
Nadal: 44.7% (30)
Fed: 54.5% (48)
% of titles won without beating a top 10:
Djoko: 14.2% (9)
Fed: 27.2% (24)
Nadal: 31.3% (21)
% of titles won without beating a top 20:
Djoko: 9.5% (6)
Nadal: 13.4% (9)
Fed: 13.6% (12)
% of titles won by beating #1 or #2 or both:
Djoko: 41.2% (26)
Nadal: 31.3% (21)
Fed: 25% (22)
ako zanemarimo onu prvu kategoriju jer je ona po sistemu zrebovanja raritet osim na WTF-u gdje je tesko da te zaobidje tako sta, vidimo da su noletovi putevi do titula u prosjeku daleko najtezi po rejtingu protivnika i preprekama do titula a da se fedovi i rafini i ne razlikuju znacajno medjusobno!Last edited by talicni; 07-04-16, 16:40.
Comment
-
http://www.itftennis.com/media/226644/226644.pdf
Da se igraci na Olimpijadi slucajno ne bi previse umorili, ovo vise necemo vidjati..
Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ivan_pg View Posthttp://volimpodgoricu.me/2016/04/08/...spodar-tenisa/ zna li neko je li nadal izjavio ovohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Ne, ovo je objavljeno 1.aprila na stranom portalu, a sto je nekim drugim portalima trebalo par dana da prenesu i jos usput nisu shvatili da je u pitanju fora, to je druga stvarhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostNe, ovo je objavljeno 1.aprila na stranom portalu, a sto je nekim drugim portalima trebalo par dana da prenesu i jos usput nisu shvatili da je u pitanju fora, to je druga stvar
Comment
-
-
sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.
Comment
Comment