Hahah nema znakova pored puta, taman.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nitto ATP Finals London 2020.
Collapse
X
-
Zagovara best of 3 i na slemovima
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Argument mu je da mladi ne mogu da drze toliko dugo paznju i da je prosecan broj godina teniskog navijaca 61, a to je netacno, to je nesto sto je Moratoglu odvalio kad je promovisao onu svoju egzibiciju tokom korone, kad je bilo ono neko suludo bodovanje.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DinoFC View PostPodrzavam. Tenis kao sport ne moze prezivjeti meceve od 6 sati koje niko ne gleda van hard core fanovahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Vidjeh, procitah.. Nije netacna, ali nije ni u potpunosti tacna. Odnosi se samo na Ameriku (u kojoj tenis inace nije nesto popularan poslednjih decenija) i na iskljucivo musku konkurenciju itd...
Ali to mi sve opet nije nikakav argument. Neke stvari treba da budu iznad prohtjeva milenijalaca danasnjice, koji nemaju zivaca i strpljenja ni film da pogledaju (ja ).Last edited by Joker; 16-11-20, 17:44.
Comment
-
Taj prosek je bas mali deo teniskih navijaca, ajde da je uzeto celo americko trziste pa i da se kaze nesto...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SebastianVettel View PostNe znam baš šta bi ti rekao za ove brze uslove na hardu. Uzeo je AO jednom i to u periodu 08-14 kad je bio sporiji hard, Cincy jednom, Shangai/Madrid dvoranski jednom, Bercy i WTF nikad... I na ultimate tennis statistics jasno se vidi da mu % pobjeda raste sto je manja brzina terena i to eksponencijalno. Znam da si vrlo inteligentan čovjek ali ne vidim jasnu argumentaciju za ovakvu tvrdnju
Nadal je uzeo 1 AO a 4 USO. Kanadu koja se smatra brzom je uzeo 5 puta, Sinsi jednom. U dvorani je generalo govoreci losiji, u prvom redu zato sto je drugima lakse da igraju agresivno. Uzeo je 3 puta spori IW, ali se tamo dobro prima spin. Nikada nije uzeo spori Majami.
Te protivrjecne podatke je tesko objasniti dok se ne shvati da Nadal ima dva stila igre. Prvi je defanzivni kojim je postao kralj sljake. Isti stil na sporom hardu ne ide, a pogotovo ima problema na brzom hardu. Medjutim, Rafa zna da igra i agresivno na hardu. Da ide na kratke poene sa ravnijim FH-dom, njegov servis koji stalno popravlja je dovoljno dobar da lako dobija svoje gemove. Osim toga, ima dobar volej i, sto je najvaznije, sampionski mentalitet. S vremenom je usavrsio tu igru. Tako je uzeo 4 USO. Novaku je pred nosom odnio 2013. Kanadu, Sinsi i Ameriku.
Sto je najfacinantnije, modifiikacijom te igre je pobijedio Novaka prije mjesec dana na super sporoj sljaci. Novak je bio u odlicnoj formi, a Rafa ga je oduvao sa terena.
Jesi li ga gledao gdje je cekao Rubljovljev 2. servis?
Rafa je vise od obicnog sljakasa.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostNikada nije uzeo spori Majami.
Slozicu se da nisu cista posla sa njim kad je ta analiza podloge i uslova u pitanju i nesumnjivo je dokazao da je on veliki sampion na svim podlogama. Pa i na travi. I da, vjerovatno vise igra ulogu to koliko, zapravo, konkurencija moze dobro da igra na odredjenoj podlozi, a ne koliko ce on biti "los".
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostNije bilo potrebno za komplimentima.
Nadal je uzeo 1 AO a 4 USO. Kanadu koja se smatra brzom je uzeo 5 puta, Sinsi jednom. U dvorani je generalo govoreci losiji, u prvom redu zato sto je drugima lakse da igraju agresivno. Uzeo je 3 puta spori IW, ali se tamo dobro prima spin. Nikada nije uzeo spori Majami.
Te protivrjecne podatke je tesko objasniti dok se ne shvati da Nadal ima dva stila igre. Prvi je defanzivni kojim je postao kralj sljake. Isti stil na sporom hardu ne ide, a pogotovo ima problema na brzom hardu. Medjutim, Rafa zna da igra i agresivno na hardu. Da ide na kratke poene sa ravnijim FH-dom, njegov servis koji stalno popravlja je dovoljno dobar da lako dobija svoje gemove. Osim toga, ima dobar volej i, sto je najvaznije, sampionski mentalitet. S vremenom je usavrsio tu igru. Tako je uzeo 4 USO. Novaku je pred nosom odnio 2013. Kanadu, Sinsi i Ameriku.
Sto je najfacinantnije, modifiikacijom te igre je pobijedio Novaka prije mjesec dana na super sporoj sljaci. Novak je bio u odlicnoj formi, a Rafa ga je oduvao sa terena.
Jesi li ga gledao gdje je cekao Rubljovljev 2. servis?
Rafa je vise od obicnog sljakasa.
US OPEN kao posljednji slem je turnir gdje vecina igraca je ipak potrosenija i mentalno i fizicki pa je turnir gdje imamo najvise razlicitih pobjednika. Tu je Nadal islo na ruku sto je uvijek propustao dio sezone pa dolazio svijez na USO. Ali ipak za rispekt Nadalu sto je ipak dobio Novaka 2 puta u finalima USO ali opet mu je 4 daleko previse.
I mnogo toga na HC je vješto izbjegavao godinama cekajuci prave prilike za titule. Pa ne znam jel ikad odbranio titulu na HCLast edited by DinoFC; 16-11-20, 18:44.
Comment
-
Vise se digla halabuka oko Novakovog misljenja u vezi meceva u 3 dobijena seta nego kad bi neki teniser pretukao i zlostavljao neku osobu HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA. Pa kako ne podrzati takve ideje.
Kazu na BBC-iju nije Zverev kriv dok se ne dokaze ili pokrene pravni postupak. Slazem se ali neko je kriv sto misli drugacije. HahahahahhaLast edited by DinoFC; 16-11-20, 19:29.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DinoFC View PostVise se digla halabuka oko Novakovog misljenja u vezi meceva u 3 dobijena seta nego kad bi neki teniser pretukao i zlostavljao neku osobu HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA. Pa kako ne podrzati takve ideje.
Kazu na BBC-iju nije Zverev kriv dok se ne dokaze ili pokrene pravni postupak. Slazem se ali neko je kriv sto misli drugacije. Hahahahahhahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment