Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Australian Open 2020 (glavna tema)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Ljubitelj tenisa View Post
    Nije bilo razloga za strah. Federer nije bio top ali nije zbog toga izgubio. Niko u prenosu se nije bavio Rogerovim kretanjem kao neki problem zbog kojeg gubi. Pri tome je proglašeno kao jedno od najboljih izdanja Rogera poslednjih godina u Australiji.
    Ne znam gde si gledao i engleski ES i ESPN se bavio tom temom i svi su rekli da je jasno da je povredjen.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Ko je proglasio ovo za jedno od najboljih izdanja Rodzera poslednjih godina na AO?
      Dayman (a-a-ah...)
      Fighter of the Nightman (a-a-ah...)
      Champion of the sun (a-a-ah...)
      You're a master of karate and friendship
      For everyone

      Comment


      • Ja tipujem na Banjca, to je taj kapacitet
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Ljubitelj tenisa View Post
          Nije bilo razloga za strah. Federer nije bio top ali nije zbog toga izgubio. Niko u prenosu se nije bavio Rogerovim kretanjem kao neki problem zbog kojeg gubi. Pri tome je proglašeno kao jedno od najboljih izdanja Rogera poslednjih godina u Australiji.
          Hahahahah,nemoj se sprdati,prvi set je Roger bio odlican i pored povrede,ostalo srednje zalostan,ali dobar s obzirom na stanje

          Ali da je bio top bilo bi povuci potegni u najboljem slucaju

          Comment


          • zato je tako izgledao na pocetku, krenuo na prepad pa sta bude

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Mr. Wolf View Post
              Ko je proglasio ovo za jedno od najboljih izdanja Rodzera poslednjih godina na AO?
              Nije da je neki znalac veci od Banjca ali Vilander.

              Gledao sam na Eurosportu englesko komentarisanje. Jednom sam čuo da su prokomentarisali poen.

              U pitanju je bilo isključivo lateralno kretanje u desno bez trčanja. Nije bio ranjen u nogu. Sve ostalo je on vrlo fino igrao. Psihološki rasterećen je imao dobre udarce.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Srkisa View Post
                Hahahahah,nemoj se sprdati,prvi set je Roger bio odlican i pored povrede,ostalo srednje zalostan,ali dobar s obzirom na stanje

                Ali da je bio top bilo bi povuci potegni u najboljem slucaju
                Prvi je ispao top jer je Novak bio slabiji. Drugi je Federer odigrao i odservirao isto kao prvi. Samo je Novak bio bolji na reternu. I treci je bilo nesto slabije. Da se kretao bolje Roger, ne bi udarao tako slobodno. Nego je izasao rasterecen pa je pogadjao svašta. Svakako bi izgubio.

                Comment


                • Federer nije bio fit videlo se to odmah. Iz mog ugla nije ni trebao da izlazi na teren. Vidim da ga dosta pljuju na MTF zbog toga.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                    Kako nije?
                    aj razmisli malo
                    Pa nije bojana. Mark je u pravu.
                    Ali da je likovanje jeste likovanje. Jbg nismo svi isti.
                    sigpic

                    Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                    U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                    Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                      zato je tako izgledao na pocetku, krenuo na prepad pa sta bude

                      Čemu prebacivanje sebe u centar pažnje? Samo čestita pobedu i dalje sa pitanjima.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by skeptik View Post
                        Federer nije bio fit videlo se to odmah. Iz mog ugla nije ni trebao da izlazi na teren. Vidim da ga dosta pljuju na MTF zbog toga.
                        E vidis, moje misljenje je da Federer ne bi bio ni blizu svog 20-og slema da ga je kroz karijeru "krasio" takav mindset. To je rodjeni predator, koji uvijek vidi soluciju da obori protivnika, jer jedino takav mozes biti najbolji.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                          E vidis, moje misljenje je da Federer ne bi bio ni blizu svog 20-og slema da ga je kroz karijeru "krasio" takav mindset. To je rodjeni predator, koji uvijek vidi soluciju da obori protivnika, jer jedino takav mozes biti najbolji.
                          Pa neka onda njegovi navijači i on sa njima lepo čestitaju drugima pobedu, jer je on izašao da pobedi. Da je pobedio druga pesma bi bila.

                          Neka ostane predator u porazu. A ne sada, imao sam 3% sansi za pobedu.

                          Zasto Rafa i Novak ne pričaju te gluposti?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                            E vidis, moje misljenje je da Federer ne bi bio ni blizu svog 20-og slema da ga je kroz karijeru "krasio" takav mindset. To je rodjeni predator, koji uvijek vidi soluciju da obori protivnika, jer jedino takav mozes biti najbolji.
                            Bas to, neko bi predao Sandgrenu, ali on je ostao na terenu i na kraju uspeo da preokrene, spase 7 mp.
                            Sad je isto tako izasao, znao je da su mu sanse minimalne, ali je pokusao.
                            Sigurno je bio svestna posle 1.seta da nema nista od novog cuda, ali je i dalje igrao, davao koliko moze i to je to.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • A sta cu, ljubitelju, kad ih volim svu trojicu, Bog me ubio...

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Ljubitelj tenisa View Post
                                Pa neka onda njegovi navijači i on sa njima lepo čestitaju drugima pobedu, jer je on izašao da pobedi. Da je pobedio druga pesma bi bila.

                                Neka ostane predator u porazu. A ne sada, imao sam 3% sansi za pobedu.

                                Zasto Rafa i Novak ne pričaju te gluposti?
                                Novak se povuce sa terena kao protiv Stana,a on kaze da je imao 3% sanse isto je to samo je ovaj recima a ovaj delom uradio

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X