Tweet
Djoković je bolji igrač od Federera.
-
-
Na osnovu kojih kriterijuma?Originally posted by CasiraghiAl bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
Originally posted by CasiraghiOriginally posted by CasiraghiComment
-
Na osnovu toga što za razliku od Federera ima više planova i opcija koje može da sprovede u delo.Comment
-
Planova za letovanje? Pa moguce, ovaj stalno na Maldive ide, Djokovic ipak menjaOriginally posted by Chiwwi View Post
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Ne, već može da osvoji Vimbldon bez servisa, Rodja to ne može.Comment
-
Mislim da ne znas sta znaci imati vise opcija u igri
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Mislim da znam.Comment
-
Jok, ne znas
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Opet mi čitaš misli?Comment
-
Pa da, zar ti i ja nemamo tu neku vezu?Originally posted by Chiwwi View Post
Ps.odgovori na tadbasu, ako hoces, ubice nas olja [emoji3]
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Federer je najtrofejniji, jer je osvajao i 250ice i 500ke ali...kada se uzmu u obzir samo GS, završni masters i Mastersi tu su negde sva trojica...
Novak je kompletniji..može da igra na svim podlogama podjednako dobro....Federer se lošije snalazi na šljaci...Rafa je pak na šljaci odličan ali trava mu nije omiljena i tu je baš slab...
I ne zaboravimo ni ono jako važno preko koga su ova trojica uzimali titule...
Ima na ATPu negde, moram potražiti prosek ranka protivnika...Kod Novaka je prosek nešto oko 3,5, rafe 3,8 a Feda 6 ili tako nešto..
Ako sam i omašila cifre poenta je da je Novak igrao protiv bolje rangiranih u finalima nego Rodžer.Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.AliKo sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred."When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."Comment
-
Ljudi, kakva vam se čini ovogodišnja podloga? Meni deluje brže nego prethodne, kao neki medium hard...nisam stigao da istražim..Comment
-
Dosta igrača, pa čak i Federer rekoše da je sporija...
Pominjem ga jer je on jedan od onih koji su pre turnira govorili da su čuli da će biti brža nego prošle godine...Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.AliKo sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred."When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."Comment
-
Spori hard definitivno,mnogo brejkova i Andujar i Schwarzman u 4 kolu
Comment
-
Zasto cak i Federer? Pa on na svakom turniru na kojem izgubi set kuka kako je podloga spora, onda kad krene da bolje igra vise podloga nije bitna.Originally posted by Marija81 View PostDosta igrača, pa čak i Federer rekoše da je sporija...
Pominjem ga jer je on jedan od onih koji su pre turnira govorili da su čuli da će biti brža nego prošle godine...
EDIT: Isner 40 asova protiv Cilica, Kirios u prva 3.kola preko 80 asova. Vjerovatno nije prespora ako su stanju da toliko asova pogode.
Last edited by DinoFC; 01-09-19, 19:33.Comment
Comment