Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US open 2018

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pa i sada je doziveo debakl protiv Milmana.

    Comment


    • Ta ideja da igrac X bezi od igraca Y da bi sacuvao h2h i gubi od nekog pacera mi je uvek bila neverovatna
      pa oni su svi sampioni i uvek misle da ce da pobede, da imaju takav gubitnicki mentalitet ne bi osvojili ni deseti deo onoga sto su osvojili
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Pa koga boli briga za Milmana, niko mu nece spomenuti h2h sa Milmanom kad se bude pricalo o GOAT. Veliki ego je u pitanje, izgubio je svoje dvoriste pre dve nedelje, a realno na tri dobivena nema ni sanse ni nivo trenutno, klasicna situacija ko iz 2013 kao sto sam rekao.
        OVAKO

        Comment


        • Da je tako, on ne bi igrao te 2013. 4 meca protiv Nadala, nego bi pobegao svaki put, kao sto ti kazes
          ako je igrao 4 puta, mislis da mu je bio problem da igra i 5 put
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            Ta ideja da igrac X bezi od igraca Y da bi sacuvao h2h i gubi od nekog pacera mi je uvek bila neverovatna
            pa oni su svi sampioni i uvek misle da ce da pobede, da imaju takav gubitnicki mentalitet ne bi osvojili ni deseti deo onoga sto su osvojili
            Federer je to napravio barem jednom. U finalu WTF-a 2014. Svejedno, ne vjerujem da je to jucer napravio. Ali vjerujem da mu je prostrujilo kroz glavu nesto tipa: "Ako se ovdje istrosim previse, nemam nikave sanse protiv Novaka. Moram probati ovo da ovo skratim."

            Comment


            • Originally posted by NI View Post
              Federer je to napravio barem jednom. U finalu WTF-a 2014. Svejedno, ne vjerujem da je to jucer napravio. Ali vjerujem da mu je prostrujilo kroz glavu nesto tipa: "Ako se ovdje istrosim previse, nemam nikave sanse protiv Novaka. Moram probati ovo da ovo skratim."
              O boze, koliko ste naporni sa tim WTF 2014.
              ja mogu da kazem da je Djokovic svesno pobegao prosle godine na W i ove godine na AO, sto je van svaki pameti, ali od sad se drzim te price
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • “I do believe since the roof is on that there is no air circulation in the stadium. I think just that makes it a totally different US Open."

                Eto potvrde i od Fedje da su uslovi katastrofa i da se nema vazduha. Ajde veliki Dzime Konorsu, opleti i po Fedji sad.

                Comment


                • Pa Novak ima vec pozitivan h2h sa Federerom tako da to ne moze da bude izgovor. Druga stvar, Federer do titule na GS mora preko Nadala ili Novaka i tu h2h ne igra nikakvu ulogu u protivnom ne vidim smisao da igra GS ako ce da bezi od Nadala i Novaka zbog h2h. To bezanje kako kazes mozda je moglo biti aktuelno pre 5 ili 10 godina ali u ovom stadiju njegovo karijere je izlisno jer pitanje je jos koliko ce jos dugo moci da igra na nekom kompetitivnom nivou.

                  Comment


                  • Pa jeste, izasao mu je u London i Cincy, gde mu uslovi odgovaraju. Ok i u Rima al mislim tamo da je dobio Djokovica na putu ka finalu, ipak nije imao razlog za bezanje, baska nije sramota zijaniti od NAdala na sljaci.
                    OVAKO

                    Comment


                    • Nije pobegao Federer, stalo mu je bilo da dobije ono sinoc. Doduse uz sto je moguce manji utrosak energije. Opet i kada je postalo jasno da ce morati dobro da se umori i istrosi da bi pobedio - ni tada nije odustajao.
                      Ne bi imao velike sanse protiv Novaka (pogotovo nakon jucerasnjeg meca), ali preveliki je on sampion da bi se tek tako sklanjao sa puta.
                      sigpic

                      Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                      U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                      Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
                        Pa jeste, izasao mu je u London i Cincy, gde mu uslovi odgovaraju. Ok i u Rima al mislim tamo da je dobio Djokovica na putu ka finalu, ipak nije imao razlog za bezanje, baska nije sramota zijaniti od NAdala na sljaci.
                        i u IW, ali ne, pobegao je na USO
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • ovaj USO je imao ili ima veliki značaj po pitanju tog hebenog goata-ako čelavi uzme,on je na samo dva slema manje,a svi njegovi tvrde kako će uzeti bar još koji rg yadda yadda yea

                          premda,meni je to samo prašina

                          al dobro,to sam ja samo ja
                          Wizard

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            i u IW, ali ne, pobegao je na USO
                            Pa u IW se Nadal vracao od povrede, ko je znao da ce Rafa tad proigrati? Na USO ista situacija ko ova, dobio ga Nadal u Cincy, dakle u njegovo dvoriste, na USO je igrao strasno i prvi servis gem izgubio tek u 1/2 finala, zato Roger imao milion razloga da pobegne. Zato Tommy Robredo nije mogo gem uzet u sledeceg meca, nakon sto je dobio FEderera. Slicno ce biti i s Milmanom, mada on mozda uzme koji gem vise nego Tommy ako se igra po sunce.
                            OVAKO

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
                              Pa u IW se Nadal vracao od povrede, ko je znao da ce Rafa tad proigrati? Na USO ista situacija ko ova, dobio ga Nadal u Cincy, dakle u njegovo dvoriste, na USO je igrao strasno i prvi servis gem izgubio tek u 1/2 finala, zato Roger imao milion razloga da pobegne. Zato Tommy Robredo nije mogo gem uzet u sledeceg meca, nakon sto je dobio FEderera. Slicno ce biti i s Milmanom, mada on mozda uzme koji gem vise nego Tommy ako se igra po sunce.
                              Smesne su stvari koje ti pricas, ali lako je iskopati turnire gde je Nadal gubio od raznoraznih da ne bi izlazio Fedu na megdan
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Igrac ranga Federera da bezi od susreta sa velikim konkurentom, zbog h2h?! Mislim da im je to zadnje na umu, pa ova trojica dolazi na GS da bi osvojili turnir. Zar mislite da oni pristupaju mecu, misleci da su gori od protivnika, pa sada mere razliku u h2h. Pa, taj medjusebni skor je rezultat cele karijere i razlicnih faza, niz podema i padova, usavrsavanja i iskustva. Uopste ne bi bili sampioni, da bi imali takav kalkulantski pristup. Gledala sam samo zadni set, Federer je bio premoren i skoro bez ikakve koncentracije. Uslovi su jako teski za sve igrace. On se ocito nije uspeo prilagoditi danas.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X