Pa i sada je doziveo debakl protiv Milmana.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US open 2018
Collapse
X
-
Ta ideja da igrac X bezi od igraca Y da bi sacuvao h2h i gubi od nekog pacera mi je uvek bila neverovatna
pa oni su svi sampioni i uvek misle da ce da pobede, da imaju takav gubitnicki mentalitet ne bi osvojili ni deseti deo onoga sto su osvojilihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Da je tako, on ne bi igrao te 2013. 4 meca protiv Nadala, nego bi pobegao svaki put, kao sto ti kazes
ako je igrao 4 puta, mislis da mu je bio problem da igra i 5 puthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostTa ideja da igrac X bezi od igraca Y da bi sacuvao h2h i gubi od nekog pacera mi je uvek bila neverovatna
pa oni su svi sampioni i uvek misle da ce da pobede, da imaju takav gubitnicki mentalitet ne bi osvojili ni deseti deo onoga sto su osvojili
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostFederer je to napravio barem jednom. U finalu WTF-a 2014. Svejedno, ne vjerujem da je to jucer napravio. Ali vjerujem da mu je prostrujilo kroz glavu nesto tipa: "Ako se ovdje istrosim previse, nemam nikave sanse protiv Novaka. Moram probati ovo da ovo skratim."
ja mogu da kazem da je Djokovic svesno pobegao prosle godine na W i ove godine na AO, sto je van svaki pameti, ali od sad se drzim te pricehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
“I do believe since the roof is on that there is no air circulation in the stadium. I think just that makes it a totally different US Open."
Eto potvrde i od Fedje da su uslovi katastrofa i da se nema vazduha. Ajde veliki Dzime Konorsu, opleti i po Fedji sad.
Comment
-
Pa Novak ima vec pozitivan h2h sa Federerom tako da to ne moze da bude izgovor. Druga stvar, Federer do titule na GS mora preko Nadala ili Novaka i tu h2h ne igra nikakvu ulogu u protivnom ne vidim smisao da igra GS ako ce da bezi od Nadala i Novaka zbog h2h. To bezanje kako kazes mozda je moglo biti aktuelno pre 5 ili 10 godina ali u ovom stadiju njegovo karijere je izlisno jer pitanje je jos koliko ce jos dugo moci da igra na nekom kompetitivnom nivou.
Comment
-
Nije pobegao Federer, stalo mu je bilo da dobije ono sinoc. Doduse uz sto je moguce manji utrosak energije. Opet i kada je postalo jasno da ce morati dobro da se umori i istrosi da bi pobedio - ni tada nije odustajao.
Ne bi imao velike sanse protiv Novaka (pogotovo nakon jucerasnjeg meca), ali preveliki je on sampion da bi se tek tako sklanjao sa puta.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View PostPa jeste, izasao mu je u London i Cincy, gde mu uslovi odgovaraju. Ok i u Rima al mislim tamo da je dobio Djokovica na putu ka finalu, ipak nije imao razlog za bezanje, baska nije sramota zijaniti od NAdala na sljaci.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View Posti u IW, ali ne, pobegao je na USOSlicno ce biti i s Milmanom, mada on mozda uzme koji gem vise nego Tommy ako se igra po sunce.
OVAKO
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View PostPa u IW se Nadal vracao od povrede, ko je znao da ce Rafa tad proigrati? Na USO ista situacija ko ova, dobio ga Nadal u Cincy, dakle u njegovo dvoriste, na USO je igrao strasno i prvi servis gem izgubio tek u 1/2 finala, zato Roger imao milion razloga da pobegne. Zato Tommy Robredo nije mogo gem uzet u sledeceg meca, nakon sto je dobio FEderera.Slicno ce biti i s Milmanom, mada on mozda uzme koji gem vise nego Tommy ako se igra po sunce.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Igrac ranga Federera da bezi od susreta sa velikim konkurentom, zbog h2h?! Mislim da im je to zadnje na umu, pa ova trojica dolazi na GS da bi osvojili turnir. Zar mislite da oni pristupaju mecu, misleci da su gori od protivnika, pa sada mere razliku u h2h. Pa, taj medjusebni skor je rezultat cele karijere i razlicnih faza, niz podema i padova, usavrsavanja i iskustva. Uopste ne bi bili sampioni, da bi imali takav kalkulantski pristup. Gledala sam samo zadni set, Federer je bio premoren i skoro bez ikakve koncentracije. Uslovi su jako teski za sve igrace. On se ocito nije uspeo prilagoditi danas.
Comment
Comment