Tweet
Originally posted by MareLFC
View Post
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
-
Pa onda je ok raspored, domaci igraci svuda imaju prednost
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience. -
U principu je ok , samo mi taj Edmund malo bode oci..Originally posted by CasiraghiAl bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
Originally posted by CasiraghiOriginally posted by CasiraghiComment
-
Za Novaka ovakav raspored nije neobican, nema potrebe da se pravimo naivni komentarisuci a posebno pravicni. Msm smesno je citati neka ubedjivanja.
A da je lakse uci u ritam igrajuci na jednom terenu koji god to bio je cinjenica koju su potvdili i igraci. Za Djokovica , sta je tu je, nije ni prvi ni poslednji put da se suocava sa ovakvim situacijama
2016 i 2017 govore za sebe, jedini problem je sto je pamcenje kratkoSimilis simili gaudetComment
-
Pa dobro, onda su trebali Jae Clarka i Gulbisa staviti na centralni, jer je Clarke domaci igrac. Nema logike ovo, sto ako je Edmund domaci kad nije ni top 10 igrac, a nije ni nedostatak top 10 igraca sutra a ni ove najvece zvezde.Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
Nema logike staviti jednog od najvecih tenisera ikada na no.2, a pritom da je prvo kolo igrao van CC. Fed bio 16 nositelj mislim pa je svaki put dobio RL na AO, a tad ako se dobro secam nije neki Kokinakis il Ebden dobio prednost pre Rogera kao sad Edmund pred Novaka.
OVAKOComment
-
Zaista nisam sklon nekim teorijama ali ovde je vise nego ocigledno da zele Djokovica omalovazavati a sto je jos gore jako male su sanse da eventualno osvoji titulu sa ovim miksovanjem rasporeda.
Radili su to i ranije.
A kakav Edmund, da li ste ozbiljni.
Comment
-
Oh Bojana pa sto si onda prva izbacila ti vijest.I sama znas da to nije ok,a traziti stalno opeavdanja za organizatore postaje smijesno sa tvoje strane.Jednostavno Novak nema niti ce ikada imati isti tretman kao pojedini teniseri
Comment
-
No.2 je poznat kao "graveyard of champions", odakle se moze zakljuciti da Djokovic nije prvi sampion koji ce igrati na tom terenu. Iako zbog rekonstrukcije sad to nije taj teren, nego je to teren no.3.
Ja sam rekla da vise bode oci to sto je Zverev (koji nikad nista nije uradio ni na jednom slemu), na terenu no.1 nego sto je Edmund na CC. Ali mi je onda receno da je Zverev no.3. Pa ako tako gledamo Edmund je trenutno bolje plasiran od Djokovica plus je najbolje plasirani Britanac, zaista nije tesko zakljuciti gde ce igrati.The Graveyard of Champions tag was coined as many former champions fell to ignominious defeats on the No. 2 Court, including:[3]
Evonne Goolagong (1974 to Kerry Melville)
John McEnroe (1979 to Tim Gullikson)
Jimmy Connors (1983 to Kevin Curren, 1988 to Patrik Kühnen)
Virginia Wade (1984 to Karina Carlson)
Pat Cash (1991 to Thierry Champion)
Michael Stich (1994 to Bryan Shelton)[4]
Andre Agassi (1996 to Doug Flach)
Conchita Martínez (1998 to Sam Smith)
Richard Krajicek (1999 to Lorenzo Manta)
Pete Sampras (2002 to George Bastl)
Serena Williams (2005 to Jill Craybas)
Venus Williams (2006 to Jelena Janković)
Martina Hingis (2007 to Laura Granville)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Sasvim je mala verovatnoca da Zebaljos moze bilo sta taman igrali u sred Buenos Ajresa... samo da vidimo kada ce da stanu i gde tacno sa ponizavanjem 12ostrukog GS osvajaca i svog trostrukog sampiona.
ttsigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.Comment
-
Mozda je Edmund bolje plasiran od Djokovica, ali to ovde na Wimbledonu ne bi smelo da se gleda, vec bi trebalo da samo da segleda ko je koji nosilac. Naravno, stavili su ga na Cc zato sto je Britanac. Bilo koji Britanac u top 50 bi imao takvu prednost.Comment
-
Hehe...
ttsigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.Comment
-
Ma kakav Zverev,kakvi bakraci.Ne pravi se naivna
Comment
-
Molim?Originally posted by gagana View PostMa kakav Zverev,kakvi bakraci.Ne pravi se naivna
Ko se pravi naivan, kakav problem ti sad imas?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
znala sam za udate i neudate, ali nisam znala da su na tabli pisali ime muza
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Strasno kakvim glupostima iz negde XVIII veka robuju ti ljudi, pod velom tradicije...
A vremenska prognoza za danas je....?
ttsigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.Comment
-
To je zato sto su i sami glupi. Glupoj osobi je mnogo lakse da slepo prati glupost, nego da se prilagodi.Originally posted by miloolja View Postsigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….Comment
Comment