Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Open 2017

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AO je najbolji slem ove sezone, najvise dobrih meceva, najvisi nivo tenisa, najzanimljiviji
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Marija81 View Post
      Grešiš...

      I ponoviću ono što sam napisala ranije.Na početku smo se svi složili da je ovaj USO na nivou 250ice, i da Nadal ima smešan žreb...
      A sada kada je nadomak titule priča se okreće,spinuje, preuveličava njegov trud da dođe do titule i sl...i povlače sopstvene reči...
      Uopste se njegov trud ne preuvelicava. Nego se govori generalno o njemu kao igracu Maro.
      Navodis me da pomislim da ne kontas o cemu pisemo.
      Jel i dalje mislis da je na ostalim podlogama kao "Bambi na ledu"?
      sigpic

      Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

      U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
      Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Marija81 View Post
        Evo pa studirajte kome koja podloga više leži i ko je gde dominantniji.

        http://www.mekkographics.com/tennis-leaders-by-surface/
        Ništa neću da "studiram" to prepuštam vašim prepiskama koje su bile besmislene. Samo sam rekao da je smešno reći da čovek koji ima 5 finala na WB da samo može slučajno da osvoji turnir na travi.
        Ili kažeš nekome nisi dovoljno univerzalan ko Federer..
        Evo da malo uporedim sa atletikom to bi bilo ko kad bi sprinteru rekli da je promašio sport jer nije dovoljno brz kao Bolt.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Marija81 View Post
          Ne znam zašto se sve shvata kao kritika Rafe, a realno je da je van šljake kao Bambina ledu.
          Ako se neko pomuči naravno da je vrednije.
          Sandu nije da ne ume, samo je manje uspešan od njih.
          Сада тек видим ово

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            AO je najbolji slem ove sezone, najvise dobrih meceva, najvisi nivo tenisa, najzanimljiviji
            Najinteresantniji mecevi DA, najvisi nivo tenis(bar kod top favorita) NE. Nole i Endi odigrali ocajno, Fed posle 6 meseci pauze dobio par top 10 igraca, Rafa bez ikakvog samopouzdanja i sigurnosti stigao u finale. Po meni najslabiji nivo tenisa, uz to da jeste objektivno bio najuzbudljiviji, zbog ujednacenh meceva na par lopti, iako ja uvek najvise volim RG, ali on nista specijalno nije pokazao od uzbudljivosti.

            Nadal sa ovog USO i RG bi pojeo Nadala sa AO, tamo je jos uvek bilo nerezonskih gresaka, usled nesigurnosti jako puno i videlo se da je na iglama (Zverev Dimitrov) ali ipak nije pao. Dok na RG i USO je podigao nivo igre i vidi se sigurnost u celom mecu(osim prvih setova u prvih par kola).
            Last edited by colchonero; 09-09-17, 22:05.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by madrid View Post
              Najinteresantniji mecevi DA, najvisi nivo tenis(bar kod top favorita) NE. Nole i Endi odigralo ocajno, Fed posle 6 meseci pauze dobio par top 10 igraca, Rafa bez ikakvog samopouzdanja i sigurnosti stigao u finale. Po meni najslabiji nivo tenisa, uz to da jeste objektivno bio najuzbudljiviji, zbog ujednacenh meceva na par lopti, iako ja uvek najvise volim RG, ali on nista specijalno nije pokazao od uzbudljivosti.
              A koji je slem bio kvalitetniji ove sezone od AO?
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                A koji je slem bio kvalitetniji ove sezone od AO?

                Zavisi sta gledas kao kvalitet, neizvesni mecevi u 5 setova, mnogo igraca gde svako svakoga moze da izbaci= AO bez premca

                sigurnost i konstantost na visokom nivou u igri =AO na poslednjem mestu. Pogledaj RF na W kako je to izgledalo lako, bez muke, e tako je kada podignes nivo igre za klasu, isto kao kad gledas RM ili Barselonu u top formi, sve izgleda lako, dok protivnici izgledaju smesno. Dok je na AO bilo povuci potegni. Za Nadala na RG i USO isto vazi. Ja sam rekao jos na prvom turniru na sljaci da je on digao formu u odnosu na AO i da mogu da gledam meceve opusteno i da se radujem RG.
                Last edited by colchonero; 09-09-17, 22:11.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by madrid View Post
                  Zavisi sta gledas kao kvalitet, neizvesni mecevi u 5 setova= AO bez premca

                  sigurnost i konstantost na visokom nivou u igri =AO na poslednjem mestu. Pogledaj RF na W kako je to izgledalo lako, bez muke, e tako je kada podignes nivo igre za klasu, isto kao kad gleda RM ili Barselonu u top formi, sve izgleda lako. Dok je na AO bilo povuci potegni. Za Nadala na RG i USO isto vazi. Ja sam rekao jos na prvom turniru na sljaci da je on digao formu u odnosu na AO i da mogu da gledam meceve opusteno i da se radujem RG.
                  Gledam sveukupno, AO je najbolji slem ove godine bio, odlicni mecevi.
                  RG nisam pazljivo ni gledala, ali W uopste nije bio kvalitetan, prvi je Fed igrao losije nego na AOu, iako je sve dobio sa 3:0.
                  USO je raspad od slema, njega necu ni da racunam
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Odlicni mecevi mogu da se vidi i u 3. ligama u fudbalu. I sve ti izgleda kao da puca od tempa, kako obe ekipe strasno igraju, atomski fudbal krajnji rzultat 5-4 . Dodje neki prvoligas i dobije lagano 3-0 uz neatraktivan fudbal. Tako ti je i ovo.

                    Najbolji i najinteresantniji za gledanja da, nivo igre ne. Vecina nije ni nasla formu u toku godine(u stvari vecina ni ne moze bolje, igraju ttako godinama, samo sto je top5 bio na stepeniku iznad), pola najboljih zavrsilo sezonu, Fed i Rafa digli nivo za klasu i uzeli sve turnire. Da su igrali kao na AO na svakom turniru bi bio neki Dimitrov da se lomi na 1 loptu ili neki Berdih itd.
                    Last edited by colchonero; 09-09-17, 22:16.

                    Comment


                    • Necemo se sloziti ocigledno, ali meni je nivo tenisa bio veci na AO u odnosu na W, oba polufinala i finale su bila mnogo bolja na AO nego na W.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Jako je malo W gde mozes da pohvalis ukupan nivo igre npr. od 1/4 finala, jer drugacija je dinamika poena(ima ljudi koji to obozavaju, ali da je specifican, jeste), nekada zbog servisa i brzog resavanja poena, nivo u razmenama ni ne moze da dodje do izrazaja. Teze se ulazi u ritam razmena, samim tim se teze gadjaju neki neverovatni uglovi, jer nisi "zagrejan" dovoljno kao na betonu i sljaci.

                        Dobro naravno, ovo je samo moje misljenje(da je RF na W i Rafa na RG i USO bili za klasu jaci nego na W). I ti naravno misli kako hoces.
                        Last edited by colchonero; 09-09-17, 22:23.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                          Necemo se sloziti ocigledno, ali meni je nivo tenisa bio veci na AO u odnosu na W, oba polufinala i finale su bila mnogo bolja na AO nego na W.
                          Димитров Надал је био квалитетнији меч него било који на Вимблдону. Финале у 5 сетове много занимљивије и боље такође.

                          Comment


                          • Imas W gde je nivo tenisa odlican, imas meceve gde je nivo tenisa odlican za tu vrstu podloge, ove godine nije bio.
                            Polgedaj highlightse pa ces da vidis...
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Zato meni i jeste W finale iz 2008. najbolji mec. Iako je mozda bilo i napetijih i duzih i mozda kvalitetnijih(AO Nole Rafa mi prvo pada napamet od GS finala). Zato sto su oni na Wimbledonu napravili toliko dobrih razmena i bilo je toliko ritma, da je to bila vrlo retka pojava za travu.

                              Comment


                              • Pa nema trave u 2.nedelji Wimbledona
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X