Ugasio ga za sve pare, ali i dalje ovo je jad i ocaj.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Majami 2017
Collapse
X
-
Nije on naprasno izgubio formu, vec su ga malo poremetili porazi u finalima, ali je opet mnogo mentalno jaci nego 2016. Ove godine mu malo treba, mali okidac da ga pokrene, za razliku od prosle gde jednostavno nije imao nivo ni samopouzdanje ni glavu i samo je na iskustvo, klasu i ogromnu borbu dobijao po koji mec. Koliko god se trudio nije mogao bolje. Sada znamo da moze, `pitanje je da li ce ili nece, zavisno od dana i protivnika. Fali mu malo konstantnosti jos uvek, koju bi imao da je uzeo AO.Last edited by colchonero; 27-03-17, 01:10.
Comment
-
Samo da mirno privede kraju, bez glupiranja.Originally posted by CasiraghiAl bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre CanOriginally posted by CasiraghiOriginally posted by CasiraghiSrecan Mane svima koji slave.
Comment
-
Vidi se da mu znaci
Originally posted by madrid View PostVisko vec preko 5 godina na svakom turniru objasnjava da je Rafa jedan od najpotcenjenijih volej igraca(jeste istina, ali to je vec davno jasno da igra vrlo dobro voleje, pogotovo te uz mrezu).
Comment
-
Tek sada vidim da je fulao prvi set sa nulom.
Opet svaka cast na preokretu.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Ubio ga Kohli u 1.setu, nije znao Nadal gde udara, ali je bilo i ocekivano da podigne nivo igre, a da Kolsrajber padne.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Sta radi Nadal ako mi je znati.U prvom setu nije mogao dobaciti do mreze, pa neki plitki, mlaki udarcu u servis polju. Onda sasvim drugi nivo igre i servis. Ali, ako je u prvom setu cekao servis protivnika jedan metar od osnovne linije, u drugom se povukao na cetiri metra i rezultat je stigao. Kao da nesto eksperimentise, pa to verovatno ne uspeva, drugog racionalnog razloga ne vidim, da izgubis 6-0 prvi set, pa da onda odigras rutinski i sigurno sledeca dva seta.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Niki View PostSta radi Nadal ako mi je znati.U prvom setu nije mogao dobaciti do mreze, pa neki plitki, mlaki udarcu u servis polju. Onda sasvim drugi nivo igre i servis. Ali, ako je u prvom setu cekao servis protivnika jedan metar od osnovne linije, u drugom se povukao na cetiri metra i rezultat je stigao. Kao da nesto eksperimentise, pa to verovatno ne uspeva, drugog racionalnog razloga ne vidim, da izgubis 6-0 prvi set, pa da onda odigras rutinski i sigurno sledeca dva seta.
Ali pitanje sta bi bilo da je umesto Kolija bio neki igrac koji je mentalno jaci i koji je u stanju da udara jako lopticu mnogo duze.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostUpravo to, u ‚1.setu je pokusavao da igra agresivnije, da bude u terenu, da ceka blizu osnovne linije servis i proveo se kako se proveo. Kad se vratio u svoju konfornu zonu, par metara iza osnovne linije, pa je slao i balone, rezultat je odmah dosao.
Ali pitanje sta bi bilo da je umesto Kolija bio neki igrac koji je mentalno jaci i koji je u stanju da udara jako lopticu mnogo duze.
A, znamo sta bi bilo, da je neki drugi bio preko puta, brzi mec u dva seta.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Niki View PostOcito mu je tesko da napravi neke drasticne promene, a snage vise nema za svoj stil. I onda se izgleda totalno izgubi, kao u prvom setu. Verovatno Moya daje sugestije koje on pokusava da primeni, citala sam neki intervju, gde kaze da Rafa mora da igra agresivnije, drugacije, pa verujem da to radi, ali ako izgleda kao u prvom setu, onda bolje da igra po starom.
A, znamo sta bi bilo, da je neki drugi bio preko puta, brzi mec u dva seta.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment