Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roland Garros 2016. - Uzivo komentarisanje meceva

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Velika pobeda, i za sebe i za Congu!
    Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

    sigpic

    Comment


    • Originally posted by pecaros View Post
      Moj odgovor na tvoj odgovor je da nemam odgovor jer nalazim veliko saglasje
      Volim kad me neko nasmije na forumu, a ti si me nasmijao.

      Originally posted by Chiwwi View Post
      NI svidjaju mi se tvoje analize. Ako moze ukratko sta vise odgovara Djoki u mecevima sa Marejem i Vavrinkom? Suva ili vlazna sljaka? Sunce ili Oblacno(ali suvo vreme). Nadam se da moderatori nece zameriti.
      Sa Marijem je jasno - najvise sunce, pa oblacno, pa mokra sljaka.

      Sa Vavrinkom nije sve jasno ali je vjerovatno obratno nego sa Marijem.
      Last edited by NI; 29-05-16, 20:17.

      Comment


      • Ko bi rekao da je Risaru ovo 13. nastup u Parizu.. proletese godine
        Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

        sigpic

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ClayWarrior View Post
          Ko bi rekao da je Risaru ovo 13. nastup u Parizu.. proletese godine
          To je logicno, jer je Francuz znaci igrao je ovde od sedamnaeste (dobijao verovatno specijalne pozivnice u pocetku)
          sigpic

          Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

          U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
          Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

          Comment


          • Katastrofa, jos jedna setnja za favorita u zavrsnici Slema. Risar Gaske, najpozeljniji igrac za clanove velike cetvorke, kako god da igraju dobice ga rutinski.
            sigpic

            Comment


            • Ma ko bi rekao da Gaske vec ima 30 godina, oni su meni svi na 24,25 zakucani
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Ma ko bi rekao da Gaske vec ima 30 godina, oni su meni svi na 24,25 zakucani
                A na koliko ti je Federer.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by NI View Post
                  A na koliko ti je Federer.
                  Pa za njega znam koliko ima godina, plus stalno ljudi to govore, tako da tu ni ne mogu da se predjem
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Nece biti lako Mareju protiv Gaskea i nalozenih francuza.

                    Comment


                    • Mogao bi Riki da se provuce nekako do finala. Moze on itekako preko Mareja. Jedino ovaj R-V da mu ucini uslugu i izbaci Vavrinku(sto nije nemoguce), sve u svemu bila bi to jedna divna zivotna prica. Verujem da bi mu vise stalo do finala u Parizu nego na Wimbliju.
                      --ZA GOSPODINA GOVEDARICU OD NJEGOVOG VERNOG SK FAN KLEBA--

                      https://ibb.co/cD1Xnq

                      Comment


                      • Kako je igrao Agut do sada na ovom RG-su? Jel' ga neko pratio? Malo sam nesto gledao protiv Corica na trenutke.

                        Comment


                        • Glavna tema
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by NI View Post
                            Sa Marijem je jasno - najvise sunce, pa oblacno, pa mokra sljaka.

                            Sa Vavrinkom nije sve jasno ali je vjerovatno obratno nego sa Marijem.
                            Ja bih rekao da Novaku najvise odgovara sunce, sa kim bilo da igra, jer je valjda poenta u kojim uslovima on moze pruziti onaj svoj maximum, a ne koji uslovi ce biti veci hendikep za kojeg igraca. Mozda bi mokra sljaka zaista vise smetala Stanu, ali kad Novak ne moze da igra onu svoju igru sa agresivnim, explozivnim trcanjem i proklizavanjima, onda to moze biti problem i protiv nekog manje ozbiljnog igraca, a ne jos protiv Stana, koji bi ga razornim udarcima setao i tjerao na ono sto Novak bas tad ne moze.

                            Comment


                            • makar nisu izgubili smisao za humor

                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Ko to?
                                sigpic

                                Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
                                But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X