Da, bolje bi bilo da je napao pa promasio...sjajan takticki pristup, jos jedan u nizu osvojenih gutavih setova...prosle godine ih je gubio
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Australian Open 2016. - Uživo komentarisanje mečeva
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Sandugp View PostPeco, pogledaj Novaka na AO 2005 protiv Safina na primer. Kladim se da ces mu u najmanju ruku naci isto toliko mana koliko si Cungu danas nasao.
Послато са ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 7041X уз помоћ Тапатокаsigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by shminka View PostDa, bolje bi bilo da je napao pa promasio...sjajan takticki pristup, jos jedan u nizu osvojenih gutavih setova...prosle godine ih je gubioAustralian Open (2004, 2006, 2007, 2010, 2017, 2018) French Open (2009) Wimbledon (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2017) US Open (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008)
Comment
-
Originally posted by pecaros View PostNije Novak tada delovao tako anemično kao Čung danas. Grizao više, bio borbeniji i mada rezultat to nije pokazivao ostavio je bolji utisak.
Послато са ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 7041X уз помоћ Тапатокаsigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Paire bas zna da gubi
"Not a good player, but I was very bad today...Yes, he's not a very good player. I was worse than him today" -Benoit Paire onRubinhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sandugp View PostPa ovaj ANEMICNI uze 8 gemova najjacem na svetu jutros, sta bi bilo da nije bio anemican? Ne smem ni da pomislim.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
-
Ma sta 60%, vise od 15% nije isaohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amnesiac View PostTroluješ, priznaj
Covjek je prije dva dana igrao na znatno brzoj podlozi, protiv Lorenzija na ovom terenu sve izgleda kao usporeni snimak
Comment
-
jos da je u zelenoj opremi, isti Hulk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sandugp View PostPeco, pogledaj Novaka na AO 2005 protiv Safina na primer. Kladim se da ces mu u najmanju ruku naci isto toliko mana koliko si Cungu danas nasao.Australian Open (2004, 2006, 2007, 2010, 2017, 2018) French Open (2009) Wimbledon (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2017) US Open (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008)
Comment
-
Originally posted by amnesiac View PostPogrešno poređenje. Novak je na tom meču imao 17 godina i 8 mjeseci. Chung dvije godine više. Pravo poređenje bi bio meč protiv Federera dvije godine kasnije na istom turniru. Roger je dobio rutinski taj meč, ali je odmah nakon toga u Dubaiju meč bio mnogo teži i Federer je napomenuo da je Đoković u međuvremenu napredovao.
Uz duzno postovanje Cungu.
Naravno da je Novak bolji, ali poentaposta nije da se porede njih dvojica, vec da se pokaze koliko je Peca prestrog.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by pecaros View PostRazocaravajuce izdanje Cunga, bar za mene koji gaji simpatije prema njegovom tenisu.
Najveca zamerka je jer nije pokazao karakter potreban nekome ko planira biti vrhunski igrac.
Prakticno je bio u mecu svega prvih 6 gemova /koji su u sustini bili opipavanje pulsa protivnika sa Novakove strane/ da bi nakon toga delovao prilicno nezainteresovano i nemocno. Nasuprot ocekivanjima nedostajalo je eksplozivnosti, energije, koncentracije pa i zelje. Mnoge loptice bi ispracao pogledom bez da i krene na njih. Neko poput njega ko preferira biti sampionom trebao je i morao ostaviti srce na terenu u mecu protiv najboljeg igraca sveta jer bolji izazov nije mogao imati. Ovako videsmo jedno mlako, dosta beskrvno izdanje.
Tehnicki manjkav u vise segmenata, nedovoljno dobrog servisa, bez opcije generisanja vise snage u udarce. Lose se pozicionirao na riternu ostavljajuci previse otvorenu T liniju uz prilicno slabu anticipaciju. Kondiciona sprema takodje upitna.
Jedino dobro po njega je ukoliko uspe izvuci pouku iz svega time sto je video gde je i koliko mu jos puno rada predstoji.
1.
Prvih 5 gemova su bili totalno ravnopravni. To je bila prva mala pobjeda Chunga. OK, prihvatam da je Novak htio da ga testira, da sazna za ubuduce kakav je Chung sa osnovne. I uvjeren sam da nije previse sretan sa onim sto je danas probao jer zna da ce Chung ce de napreduje.
Ne bih kao Vladan rekao da ce Chung sigurno, pjeske, biti jednog dana broj jedan, ali poslije ovoga sto sam danas vidio, to me ne bi ni najmanje iznenadilo. Naravno pod uslovom da nastavi da napreduje.
2.
Jednom kad je Novak poceo da miksa, tu vise nije bilo ravnopravnosti. I moglo se vidjeti na Novakovom licu da je odahnuo poslije brejak za 4:2. A i po Novakovoj igri. Odmah se opustio u narednom gemu i Chung je vratio brejk. To je inace bio jedini gem na Novakovom servisu na kojem je Chung dosao do 40. U jos dva je dosao do 30. Dakle, nije ugrozavao Novakov servis.
3.
U drugom setu je Novak htio da isprasi Chunga, da uzme set sa 6:0, da ostavi traga za buduce meceve. Ali Korejanac se nije dao. U 5. gemu 2. set se vodila velika borba (22 poena). Novak je dosao do BL, ali nije uspio da ga brejkne. Chung je imao dosta servis vinera. To je bila druga mala pobjeda Chunga. Znacajnija od prve.
4.
U trecem set, Novak je sveo svoje ambicije na to ga rutinski dobije. Nije ni pokusavao da oduva Chunga sa terena. Vjerujem da je vrucina tome doprinijela. I Novaku i Chungu je ona prilicno smetala.Last edited by NI; 18-01-16, 09:42.
Comment
Comment