Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATP World Tour Finals - London 2015.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Na kojoj brzoj podlozi?
    Na pocetku je Vavrinka bio nervozan, sve sto je mogao je izbacio, cim je krenuo da pogadja, Ferer je postao glineni golub.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Brzoj od one u Parizu recimo. Videlo se to i protiv Nadala, rastavio ga je Rafael na proste faktore. Njemu odgovara samo ultra sporo, posto u nogama ima olovo.
      Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

      Comment


      • Ovo uopste nije brze od Pariza, podjednako je sporo i presporo, samo ovde lopta ne skace toliko.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by jacques9 View Post
          Odlična procjena.

          Uz uslov da Ferrer pobedi danas, Rafi svakako više odgovara Federere nego Novak u polufinalu, tako da ima Rafa da tankira protiv Davida.
          Po drugoj liniji razmišljanja ima možda više šanse protiv Novaka v polufinalu nego finalu ,tako da mislim, da kod Rafe odpadaju kalkulacije.
          Kako stvari stoje uslov neće biti ispunjen pa obe linije razmišljanja možemo zaboraviti.
          Inače su bile nebitne za ishod turnira pošto će isti završiti poput većine drugih velikih ove sezone, dosadno i jednolično. Federer je a da nije ni svestan u stvari učinio Novaku uslugu ranivši umornog i sitog lava.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            Ovo uopste nije brze od Pariza, podjednako je sporo i presporo, samo ovde lopta ne skace toliko.
            Rekao bih da je to tvoj subjektivni utisak.
            Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Navras 16785 View Post
              Rekao bih da je to tvoj subjektivni utisak.
              Gresis, citaj malo izjave igrace, a i ostalih, koji su strucniji od mene
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Sta su izjavili, da je podloga identicna kao u Parizu? Bas tim recima?

                Iskreno nisam nista citao, odokativno procenjujem. Pariz je bio u rangu IW i Majamija, ovo mi deluje bar za nijansu brze.
                Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

                Comment


                • Čas tenisa

                  Comment


                  • Da, rekli su da je strasno spora podloga
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Gledam Roleta i kontam da bi mu brada sasvim cool stajala Zasto da ne, trebalo bi malo da pusti, za promenu. I ono sisanje kao u Rimu 2013.

                      Nego, htedoh reci da mi se mnogo svidja ovo u vezi Rafe, mnogo mi je drago sto ovako igra, zaista je nedostajao
                      link

                      Comment


                      • Baš ga je počistio u drugom setu, strašan nivo. Odlična kombinacija snage udaraca sa varijacijama u vidu slajsa na riternu i pogotovo pasingu, a i volej igra je bila spektakularna. Bravo, pogotovo što je i David igrao dosta dobro.
                        “It's no accident, I think, that tennis uses the language of life. Advantage, service, fault, break, love, the basic elements of tennis are those of everyday existence, because every match is a life in miniature. Points become games become sets become tournaments, and it's all so tightly connected that any point can become the turning point. It reminds me of the way seconds become minutes become hours, and any hour can be our finest. Or darkest. It's our choice.”

                        Comment


                        • Ni blizu ova podloga nije sa Parizom. Ona u Parizu lopte ode u oblake, ovdje se slajs prima i kik odskace kako treba.
                          sigpic
                          "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
                          AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

                          Comment


                          • nego jedno pitanjce, šta se gleda u slučaju da Federer izgubi od Nišikorija 2:0 a Đoković dobije Berdiha 2:0? Međusobno duel ili odnos gemova?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by VR6 View Post
                              nego jedno pitanjce, šta se gleda u slučaju da Federer izgubi od Nišikorija 2:0 a Đoković dobije Berdiha 2:0? Međusobno duel ili odnos gemova?
                              Onda se stvara krug od 3 igraca sa 2 pobede i 1 porazom, pa se gledaju setovi/gemovi.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by VR6 View Post
                                nego jedno pitanjce, šta se gleda u slučaju da Federer izgubi od Nišikorija 2:0 a Đoković dobije Berdiha 2:0? Međusobno duel ili odnos gemova?
                                Roger prvi, Novak drugi...set količnik izbaci Keia, a medjusobni duel Federera i Đokovića odredi poredak prve dvojice

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X