Slobodno nek ga gadjaju, izmislit ce Role novi udarac, nije belaj.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US Open 2015.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Velikiajnstajn View PostNi, dal je Novak ikad tom logikom bio dominantan na hardu?
1.
Rafa je na sljaci bilo dominantan da se protivnik malo pita od 2005 do 2010. Moze se reci da je u Umbldonu i USO-u iste gosine dostigao taj nivo dominacije.
2.
Federer je bio tako doninantan na travi 4 -5 godina i nesto krace na hardu.
3.
Novak je imao taj nivo dominacije na AO 2011, generalno vecim dijelom 2011. I mozda 2013. iza USO-a. Ali to se mjeri mjesecima a ne godinama.
Comment
-
I kako je nastao cuveni SABR, mrzelo ga da trenira, tj. bio je umoran i zezao se sa Paierom na treningu
Q. Can you explain about the derivation of how you came up with it, whose idea it was? I have also seen some people worried about what you all called it, if you could explain that a little.
ROGER FEDERER: So when I arrived in Cincinnati, I arrived, I don't know what time it was, maybe after lunchtime, and then I went for a hit. It was Benoit Paire. He had like an ear problem. I was tired from jet lag. We were tired and practicing on center court, which was great. Last year I couldn't practice on center court before my first match. This time I had plenty of time. I think it was Friday and Saturday, I guess. So I put in a lot of hours on center court. But that time I was very tired and he was tired, and at the end we said, Well, let's still play some games just because it feels like it's the right thing to do. I was going to stop already, but Severin said, Play a few games get used to the conditions. I said, Whatever. Let's play some games. And, yeah, at the end we were just kidding around almost, and that's when I said, Okay, I'm going to chip and charge and just keep the points short. I'm tired. I want to get off the court soon anyway. That's when I started to run in and hit returns. I hit a couple for a winner. They were like ridiculous. He laughed, I laughed, Severin laughed. Then I did it again in the next practice just to see if it actually would still work again. Then I tried it the next practice and it still worked. That's what Severin said, Well, what about using it in a match? I was like, Really? (Laughter.) So he pushed me to keep using it and not shy away from using it on big moments, and not just because you don't know how you look with a full stadium. He was actually the one who pushed, you know, pushed me to it. And because we were always talking about that tactic, as well, we sort of came up with that name, you, know, sneak attack by Roger, ^ saber. I don't know. Call it Fed attack, call it whatever you want, but I thought it was kind of funny. And, yeah, today again it worked a couple of times. I didn't get that many second serves when I thought I could use it, but moving forward it's an option. Clearly I'm very happy it worked so well in Cincy.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by p4p1 View Post5, ukljucujuci sinoc
Trebalo bi prebrojati koliko je imao vinera iz fh paralela
Navijam svakako za njega veceras protiv Lopeza.
Comment
-
Drugim recima Beker je rekao da je ovo neprihvatljivo. Kao u linku sto sam postavila pre neki dan, dilema je postavljena jel ovaj poteg sportski, jer dozvoljen svakako jeste. I sve ovo samo zato sto se radi o Federeru. Kao sto NI kaze ovo je Bekerovo blago upozorenje prema Federeru, na njega je da ga shvati na pravi nacin. Ipak, je on simbol ovog sporta i reper sportskog ponasanja.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Niki View PostDrugim recima Beker je rekao da je ovo neprihvatljivo. Kao u linku sto sam postavila pre neki dan, dilema je postavljena jel ovaj poteg sportski, jer dozvoljen svakako jeste. I sve ovo samo zato sto se radi o Federeru. Kao sto NI kaze ovo je Bekerovo blago upozorenje prema Federeru, na njega je da ga shvati na pravi nacin. Ipak, je on simbol ovog sporta i reper sportskog ponasanja.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Pred Borisom kapu skidam. Kakav je to samo strateg, neustrasiv i neprikosnoven. Kakvu je samo nebulozu izvukao iz sesira. Sta bi radili u njegovo vreme? Izlazili na servis liniju da pokupe servis? Jel bi to bilo izvodljivo sa onakvim alatkama i zicama? Ne bi Ovo je nas genijalni Bum Bum smislio iskljucivo kako bi iritirao(u nekoj dozvoljenoj meri) svajcarca. Neka slicna provokacija je bila izrecena i tokom Wimblija, ako se dobro secam. Kakav je to uticaj imalo na Feda?
Fed je po prvi put izasao na centralni teren proslog jula nervozan i nesiguran. Koliko ove prozivke uticu na njega? Ko bi to mogao reci..
Comment
-
Meni samo nije jasno sta ovde nije sportski
Da li je sportski setati protivnika ako on ima povredu ili mu slati ds?
Da li je sportski eksploatisati neciju slabu stranu i slati mu stalno lopte na istu?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Meni to apsolutno nije nesportski, gadjati protivnika u telo, ali nesportski bi mi bilo gadjati ga u glavu, jer tu ides da ga namerno povredis i onesposobis.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment