Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Open 2015. - Uživo komentarisanje mečeva

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A kako je odjednom Anderson postao igracina i reper, to mi tek nije jasno

    Sent from my D5803
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Uvijek ce biti veci od Gaskea, barem ima oruzja da ugrozi, Gaske moze samo da broji gemove protiv velike trojke. Osam gemova mu je uzeo, a igra tenis zivota.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • A Gaskea da ne konentarisem, prangija od igraca.
        Laku noc dobri ljudi.

        Comment


        • Anderson u prvom qf slema ali je veci igrac od Gaskea, koji je igrao vec sf slema...svasta ovde moze da se procita

          Sent from my D5803
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            Anderson u prvom qf slema ali je veci igrac od Gaskea, koji je igrao vec sf slema...svasta ovde moze da se procita

            Sent from my D5803
            Federer - Gaske 14:2, osvojio sest setova
            Djokovic - Gaske 13:1, osvojio pet setova
            Nadal - Gaske 13:1, osvojio pet setova

            Da mi nije tezina i gemove bih mu prebrojao sto je tek porazavajuce, ali to je smijesan igrac, nema on oruzja. Anderson ih ima, moze da ugrozi, ima servis, ima snagu u udarcima, Gaske nema nista bez lijep za oko BH.
            sigpic

            Comment


            • Toliko moze da ugrozi da mu je ovo prvo qf slema, gubio je od ko zna kojih igraca, nije ni stizao do najboljih...
              Sve je to super, izbacio Mareja, ali bilo je logicno da bude i psihicki i fizicki ispraznjen posle takvog meca i da ne moze da ponovi partiju.

              Sent from my D5803
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Gledaj Gaskea, ne zna covjek igra li tenis ili je linijski sudija. Odalji se jos malo
                sigpic

                Comment


                • Pa sad ga je slomio skroz...

                  Sent from my D5803
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Bas smor cetvrtfinala, jedina borba bila u duelu Cilica i Conge, a i to jer se Marin prilicno izglupirao. Ali ce bar polufinala biti dobra, mogla bi oba da idu u pet setova.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
                      Samo na kraju prvog seta je napravio 7-8 neiznudjenih, od toga barem 6 iz BHa potpuno nepotrebno. Gaske je raspad, meni nikad nece bti jasno kako on uopste nekog ozbiljnog tenisera dobije i kako probije snagom ali sam definitivno ocekivao da ce ovo Federer lakse rijesiti. Ne rezultatski, igracki. Federer ce dobiti 3:0 u svakom slucaju i Gaske treba da pjeva ako dogura do 4 u jednom setu.
                      Može mu se. Ima brejk. Ne prećerujmo. Ako iko ima loše mišljenje o Gasquetu kao igraču to sam ja, ali nije on rekreativac. Nedostojan protivnik za četvrtfinale i više liči na prvo kolo i tako izgleda. Idealan za traženje igre i kao dobar sparing za Wawrinku. Ja nijesam gledao drugi meč osim prvog seta, a u njemu je Anderson bio očajan. Podsjetiću da je u Sinsinatiju istom tom Kevinu Roger ostavio dva gejma. Ni on nije neki reper.
                      Protiv Kohlschreibera zaista nije briljirao, ali ne sjećam se da je i u svom primeu igrao jednako dobro u svim kolima. Bitna je laka pobjeda.

                      Jedino mi je žao što se polufinale neće igrati u noćnom terminu. To je bio problem i na meču protiv Kohlia. Mnogo je bolji Federer pod reflektorima.
                      Australian Open (2004, 2006, 2007, 2010, 2017, 2018) French Open (2009) Wimbledon (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2017) US Open (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008)

                      Comment


                      • Mislim da su mu protiv Kolija najveci problem pravile one sulude senke po AAu, ono je bas nezgodno.

                        Sent from my D5803
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Meh, Anderson je igrao mec zivota protiv Mareja, danas je to bilo mlako...

                          Comment


                          • Mene niko ne nervira kao Gaske. On mi je bas nejasan potpuno, kako taj lik ikoga pobijedi pitam se ponekad. Ali on nekim cudom stigne do cetvrtfinala, polufinala Slama i onda tamo ako igra protiv nekog od velike trojke taj igrac bukvalno ima WO. Jer je on za najbolje opasnost taman kao Cipola. I ne trudi se nista da uradi povodom toga, da barem proba, bilduje malo, udara pritojno, ima neku snagu u FHu, fizicki se bolje spremi, ali ne, nista. On npr. Novaka namuci pola sata na RGu, na pocetku meca i zavrsi mec tako sto izgubi 6:3 6:2 6:1. Potpuna smijurija od igraca.
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • Ocekivano lako Taman dobar trening da se udarci nasteluju. I prvi servis ubacen 76% sto je dobro, mislim i najbolje na ovom turniru, trebace mu protiv Wawrinke.


                              edit: juuu, kako je Rodzeru pocela da se povlaci kosa...

                              Comment


                              • Stan odigrao sabr protiv Andersona

                                Sent from my D5803
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X