Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Indian Wells 2015. - BNP Paribas Masters 1000

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kako se sad Rodzer smejulji, dolazi mu musterija a ne Dzelat (pa i u ovakvom stanju)

    Comment


    • Auuu, nije mi jasno kako je dobio ovaj mec, u prva 2 seta je Nadal bio bolji, ali je nekako cupao brejk lopte, izvukao TB, Nadal odigrao ocajno na mec lopte, Raonic hrabro, a u 3.setu su bili izjednaceni i na kraju je ona neverovatna lopta na liniju presudila.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Crnogorac ce razbit Djokija :-)

        Comment


        • doha 2010. finale vs davidenko
          od tad nije izgubio ne iskoristivsi mec lopte

          Comment


          • Originally posted by maliajnstajn View Post
            Pa namjesta se da dodje na penal Noletu, ne moze njemu Role ovdje nista, presporo je ovo.
            I Aki kralju nece Rodzer u finalu protiv Noleta igrati .... Meri njemu dolazi tamo
            sigpic

            Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

            U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
            Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

            Comment


            • Nadal je osvojio 10 poena vise, bas velika razlika
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Auuu, nije mi jasno kako je dobio ovaj mec, u prva 2 seta je Nadal bio bolji, ali je nekako cupao brejk lopte, izvukao TB, Nadal odigrao ocajno na mec lopte, Raonic hrabro, a u 3.setu su bili izjednaceni i na kraju je ona neverovatna lopta na liniju presudila.
                E ajde ti ovo objasni na neke ljude odavde molim te. Sad i na FB me ubedjuju kako je Raonic bio bolji rival u celog meca, jao majko bozja. Nadal je izgubio ovaj mec, nije ga Milos dobio. Dva cela seta bolji protivnik i on to ne iskoristi. U trecem na pocetku je bio Milos bolji ali posle su bili izjednaceni i normalno kod brejk lopte Milos lupao asove, a na Nadalova brejk lopta Milos je pogodio udarac a nije hteo tako da odigra, nesto kao Sepi na mec loptu protiv Rogera u Melburnu.

                @sand, ne si ti brate valjda ozbiljan da ce FEderer dobiti Novaka ovde. Mozes zivota da uplatis na Novaka, ima da ga odvali i to u dva seta, presporo je ovo za Roger da moze nesto protiv Novak.
                OVAKO

                Comment


                • Originally posted by miloolja View Post
                  Pa vi nagrdiste Raonu....
                  Izner igra leprsavo a Raonic je drvo...
                  "But Pascal what are you saying?"

                  Comment


                  • Stefane gledaj sta pisem covece ... jesam li ja napisao da ce igrati protiv Novaka?
                    sigpic

                    Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                    U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                    Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                    Comment


                    • Trebalo je u dva seta dobiti, mogao je i ovako, ali sta je tu je. Sve u svemu nivo igre ide prema gore. Tri seta bez znacajnih oscilacija je novina ove godine. Idealno je bilo dobiti vakav mec, ali. . .

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
                        E ajde ti ovo objasni na neke ljude odavde molim te. Sad i na FB me ubedjuju kako je Raonic bio bolji rival u celog meca, jao majko bozja. Nadal je izgubio ovaj mec, nije ga Milos dobio. Dva cela seta bolji protivnik i on to ne iskoristi. U trecem na pocetku je bio Milos bolji ali posle su bili izjednaceni i normalno kod brejk lopte Milos lupao asove, a na Nadalova brejk lopta Milos je pogodio udarac a nije hteo tako da odigra, nesto kao Sepi na mec loptu protiv Rogera u Melburnu.

                        @sand, ne si ti brate valjda ozbiljan da ce FEderer dobiti Novaka ovde. Mozes zivota da uplatis na Novaka, ima da ga odvali i to u dva seta, presporo je ovo za Roger da moze nesto protiv Novak.
                        Nadal ga je ispustio u 2.setu, imao je sline brejk lopte, ali mora da se oda i priznanje Milosu, igrao je hrabro u tim prilikama.
                        Nadal je najvise propustio na 2. i 3. mec lopti, kad je ocajno riternirao na 2.servis, nije ni ubacio loptu u igru.

                        A u 3. setu su bili izjednaceni, ja sam mislila da ce ponovo da igraju TB, ali ona lopta presudila
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
                          E ajde ti ovo objasni na neke ljude odavde molim te. Sad i na FB me ubedjuju kako je Raonic bio bolji rival u celog meca, jao majko bozja. Nadal je izgubio ovaj mec, nije ga Milos dobio. Dva cela seta bolji protivnik i on to ne iskoristi. U trecem na pocetku je bio Milos bolji ali posle su bili izjednaceni i normalno kod brejk lopte Milos lupao asove, a na Nadalova brejk lopta Milos je pogodio udarac a nije hteo tako da odigra, nesto kao Sepi na mec loptu protiv Rogera u Melburnu.

                          @sand, ne si ti brate valjda ozbiljan da ce FEderer dobiti Novaka ovde. Mozes zivota da uplatis na Novaka, ima da ga odvali i to u dva seta, presporo je ovo za Roger da moze nesto protiv Novak.
                          Ovde uopšte nije presudilo ko je bolji nego ko je manje loš i ko osvaja važne poene i to na grešku protivnika.
                          Bojana,jeste Nadal imao 10 poena više ali i mnogo grešaka više.
                          Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.Ali
                          Ko sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred.
                          "When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
                            Stefane gledaj sta pisem covece ... jesam li ja napisao da ce igrati protiv Novaka?
                            Sad je jos smesnije, ne mislis valjda da ce Endi tako zvani drugi servis ala Erani dobiti Novaka na sporom hardu? Nemoj zdobole me stomak, molim te brate.
                            OVAKO

                            Comment


                            • Marija, 10 poena vise je 10 poena vise nebitne su tu greske to su ti dva i po gema ....
                              sigpic

                              Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                              U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                              Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Marija81 View Post
                                Ovde uopšte nije presudilo ko je bolji nego ko je manje loš i ko osvaja važne poene i to na grešku protivnika.
                                Bojana,jeste Nadal imao 10 poena više ali i mnogo grešaka više.
                                10 poena vise, 116 na prema 106, to je velika razlika kod ovakvog rezultata, znaci da je Nadal uglavnom lako resavao svoje gemove, a da se Raonic mucio, a Raonic je opet pobedio.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X