Kako se sad Rodzer smejulji, dolazi mu musterija a ne Dzelat (pa i u ovakvom stanju)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Indian Wells 2015. - BNP Paribas Masters 1000
Collapse
X
-
Auuu, nije mi jasno kako je dobio ovaj mec, u prva 2 seta je Nadal bio bolji, ali je nekako cupao brejk lopte, izvukao TB, Nadal odigrao ocajno na mec lopte, Raonic hrabro, a u 3.setu su bili izjednaceni i na kraju je ona neverovatna lopta na liniju presudila.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by maliajnstajn View PostPa namjesta se da dodje na penal Noletu, ne moze njemu Role ovdje nista, presporo je ovo.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Nadal je osvojio 10 poena vise, bas velika razlikahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostAuuu, nije mi jasno kako je dobio ovaj mec, u prva 2 seta je Nadal bio bolji, ali je nekako cupao brejk lopte, izvukao TB, Nadal odigrao ocajno na mec lopte, Raonic hrabro, a u 3.setu su bili izjednaceni i na kraju je ona neverovatna lopta na liniju presudila.
@sand, ne si ti brate valjda ozbiljan da ce FEderer dobiti Novaka ovde. Mozes zivota da uplatis na Novaka, ima da ga odvali i to u dva seta, presporo je ovo za Roger da moze nesto protiv Novak.OVAKO
Comment
-
Stefane gledaj sta pisem covece ... jesam li ja napisao da ce igrati protiv Novaka?sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View PostE ajde ti ovo objasni na neke ljude odavde molim te. Sad i na FB me ubedjuju kako je Raonic bio bolji rival u celog meca, jao majko bozja. Nadal je izgubio ovaj mec, nije ga Milos dobio. Dva cela seta bolji protivnik i on to ne iskoristi. U trecem na pocetku je bio Milos bolji ali posle su bili izjednaceni i normalno kod brejk lopte Milos lupao asove, a na Nadalova brejk lopta Milos je pogodio udarac a nije hteo tako da odigra, nesto kao Sepi na mec loptu protiv Rogera u Melburnu.
@sand, ne si ti brate valjda ozbiljan da ce FEderer dobiti Novaka ovde. Mozes zivota da uplatis na Novaka, ima da ga odvali i to u dva seta, presporo je ovo za Roger da moze nesto protiv Novak.
Nadal je najvise propustio na 2. i 3. mec lopti, kad je ocajno riternirao na 2.servis, nije ni ubacio loptu u igru.
A u 3. setu su bili izjednaceni, ja sam mislila da ce ponovo da igraju TB, ali ona lopta presudilahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View PostE ajde ti ovo objasni na neke ljude odavde molim te. Sad i na FB me ubedjuju kako je Raonic bio bolji rival u celog meca, jao majko bozja. Nadal je izgubio ovaj mec, nije ga Milos dobio. Dva cela seta bolji protivnik i on to ne iskoristi. U trecem na pocetku je bio Milos bolji ali posle su bili izjednaceni i normalno kod brejk lopte Milos lupao asove, a na Nadalova brejk lopta Milos je pogodio udarac a nije hteo tako da odigra, nesto kao Sepi na mec loptu protiv Rogera u Melburnu.
@sand, ne si ti brate valjda ozbiljan da ce FEderer dobiti Novaka ovde. Mozes zivota da uplatis na Novaka, ima da ga odvali i to u dva seta, presporo je ovo za Roger da moze nesto protiv Novak.
Bojana,jeste Nadal imao 10 poena više ali i mnogo grešaka više.Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.AliKo sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred."When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."
Comment
-
Marija, 10 poena vise je 10 poena vise nebitne su tu greske to su ti dva i po gema ....sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marija81 View PostOvde uopšte nije presudilo ko je bolji nego ko je manje loš i ko osvaja važne poene i to na grešku protivnika.
Bojana,jeste Nadal imao 10 poena više ali i mnogo grešaka više.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment