Tweet
http://www.b92.net/sport/tenis/vesti...&nav_id=924799
Cekaj nije mi ovo bas najjasnije - ako se racuna do pocetka zavrsnog onda Novak ima 7?
Cekaj nije mi ovo bas najjasnije - ako se racuna do pocetka zavrsnog onda Novak ima 7?
-
It's not who you are underneath, it's what you do that defines you -
deka Role, jos je izasao u onom dzempericu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Kako god, Chick ima poentu
Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.Comment
-
Nek se sjeti poente kad ga ledja uhvate, pa ne mogne na posao otići
Da je mogao igrati, igrao bi...toliko je jednostavnoComment
-
Znaci bilo je bolje da je izasao, statirao pola ili ceo mec, koji bi bio gotov za 40,50 minuta, to bi bilo odlicno za tenis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
A šta znam, očito da Chick stvari vidi nešto drugačije
Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.Comment
-
Poenta teksta nije jel bi mec bio kvalitetan ili ne, nego jeli Federer trebao igrati sa bolovima, sto je cesto kod profesionalaca ili ne. Nadal je na AO statirao tri seta zbog finala, publike, protivnika, sponzora itd. Daleko da je situacija identicna, ali poenta je ta.Comment
-
Ali sta bi se dobilo time ako bi on izasao na teren?
I nemoj da uporedjujes sa Nadalom, on je 1.set odigrao skroz regularno...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Nije igrao ne zato sto nije mogao, nego zato sto nije mogao da pobedi u datim okolnostima. Chick se na to ustremio.Originally posted by Niki View PostTom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.Comment
-
Pa, valjda da odradi tih 1 milion koji je zaradio.
Rekla sam da nije identicna situacija sa Nadalom, ali ima slicnih detalja, povreda itd.
Nista sporno da ljudi gledaju sa raznih aspekata na ovu situaciju.Comment
-
A prosle godine kad je izlazio na penale svima sa povredjenim ledjima onda taj isti Chick nije pisao kako je Federer fer igrac, nego ga je najvervatnije slao u penziju
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Da, nije trebao to spomenuti Roger. . .mislim koga briga jel Roger moze pobediti ili ne, njegov nastup na DC.Originally posted by Navras View Post Sem par navijaca.
Moras izaci i odigrati, pa makar izgubio sa 6-0 6-0 to je pretpostavljam hteo da kaze.
p.s.
Jel neko zna zasto juce nije Federer primio pehar (tacnu, sta vec) kao finalista?Last edited by Niki; 17-11-14, 13:18.Comment
-
Chick fantastično vidi stvari...osudjuje čovjeka koji je 1300 puta bio spreman da izadje na teren, a 3 puta nije
1300 dana...ili nešto jače od 3 i po godine provedene na terenu...na poslu
Vežeš ti 3 i po godine sa 2 dana bolovanja na poslu...tražiš naposlijetu i treći dan bolovanja...a neko ti kaže:"Stari, ti si sramota!"
fantastično razmišljanje
i samo još jedan dokaz koliko sa današnjim medijima danas jesi, a sutra nisi
Comment
-
To ti je tako i u svakodnevnom zivotu, a ne pa u profesionalnom sportu, gde su kao u tenisu, bezobrazno preplaceni.
Uvek se "greska" pamti, a ne ono ostalo.Comment
-
Chicka bi svako od nas poželio za šefa
Comment
Comment