Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Open 2014.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by shminka View Post
    Andy vala ni po čemu ne može u istu rečenicu sa trojicom ispred, nit će ikada moći
    Neko tu mora biti manje a neko vise uspjesan, ali to je big four takva kakva jeste

    Comment


    • ako se kad upiše kao prvi teniser svijeta, treba razmisliti o tome...do tada

      Comment


      • A budale pisale onoliki clanak o big four, javi im da zive u zabludi

        Comment


        • Originally posted by shminka View Post
          Andy vala ni po čemu ne može u istu rečenicu sa trojicom ispred, nit će ikada moći

          velika trojka i best of the rest
          Postojala je velika cetvorka.

          Koji je omjer pobjeda i poraza Federera sa bilo kime ko nije calan cetvorke? U prosijeku 10:1. Svako iz cetvorke je mogao pobijediti svakoga i to redovno. Nije bio slucaj sa ostalima.

          Comment


          • Velika cetvorka je mit, nikad nije realno postojala
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Možda na mastersima, na GSovima nije...Andy svejedno ne može u isti rečenicu sa preostalom trojkom...ni blizu

              Roger-Andy na GSu 4-1...još mu nikad nije mogao doći na RGu...Roger još u doba "istinskog broja 1" rekao...bilo koja podloga, bilo gdje na svijetu, u 5 setova
              Last edited by shminka; 07-09-14, 21:42.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by shminka View Post
                Možda na mastersima, na GSovima nije...Andy svejedno ne može u isti rečenicu sa preostalom trojkom...ni blizu

                Roger-Andy na GSu 4-1...još mu nikad nije mogao doći na RGu...Roger još u doba "istinskog broja 1" rekao...bilo koja podloga, bilo gdje na svijetu, u 5 setova
                Rafa- Fed na GS 9-2 i ? Fed nije clan velike cetvorke

                Comment


                • Bilo je samo pitanje vremena kad ce FC da ubaci H2H u pricu
                  prica se o Mareju, a on za svaki slucaj kaze koji je H2h izmedju Roleta i Nadala
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • kakve veze to sa životom ima...Rafa:Andy 7:2

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                      Bilo je samo pitanje vremena kad ce FC da ubaci H2H u pricu
                      prica se o Mareju, a on za svaki slucaj kaze koji je H2h izmedju Roleta i Nadala
                      Pa logicno kada daje argument H2H na GS da diskredituje Marijev polozaj u velikoj cetvorci.


                      EDIT: Mogu samo kontra pitanje postaviti, kakve veze sa zivotom ima Fed-Andy 4-1?
                      Last edited by DinoFC; 07-09-14, 21:47.

                      Comment


                      • Nije bio prvi na svijetu, nije bio blizu prvog na svijetu, ne igra na jednoj podlozi nikako, ima daleko najmanje GS titula, minus protiv svih iz vrha

                        a da ne kažem da njih 4 nikad u završnici nekog GSa nisu predstavljali nešto što bi nazvali velikom 4...nikad nije bila 4...većinom 3...često 2
                        Last edited by shminka; 07-09-14, 21:50.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
                          Pa logicno kada daje argument H2H na GS da diskredituje Marijev polozoj u velikoj cetvoci.
                          Pa to jeste ogroman argument, Marej je prosle godine prvi put dobio Federera na slemu, kad je ovaj imao pune 32 godine,a Marej je 6 godina mladji
                          Marej jednotavno nije clan velike cetvorke, postojala je velika trojka, Marej koji nije nivo sa njim, ali je iznad ostalih i ostali...
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Pa blizi je Djokovic njemu po GS titulama nego Nadalu, ko je sve bio na poziciji broj 1 Andy tamo ne mora da bude i da pored toga svi znamo koliko je kvalitetan. Sampras nije igrao na jednoj podlozi pa je bio GOAT

                            Comment


                            • jest, sa 7 puta više GSova

                              trojica su legende ove igre, Andy ne da nije ni blizu...ni na mapi

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
                                Pa blizi je Djokovic njemu po GS titulama nego Nadalu, ko je sve bio na poziciji broj 1 Andy tamo ne mora da bude i da pored toga svi znamo koliko je kvalitetan. Sampras nije igrao na jednoj podlozi pa je bio GOAT

                                ma jeste, Sampras je krsina bio, i to teska

                                I niko ne govori da Andy nije kvalitetan, samo nije nivo ove trojke.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X