Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wimbledon 2014. - Uživo komentarisanje mečeva

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Murray- Djokovic Fed- Rafa

    Comment


    • #47
      Projected men's quarterfinals:
      Djokovic-Berdych
      Murray-Ferrer
      Wawrinka-Federer
      Raonic-Nadal.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • #48
        Projected #Wimbledon R16s bottom half:
        Wawrinka-Isner
        Janowicz-Federer
        Raonic-Nishikori
        Gasquet-Nadal.

        Projected #Wimbledon R16s top half:
        Djokovic-Tsonga
        Gulbis-Berdych
        Murray-Fognini
        Dimitrov-Ferrer.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • #49
          Neil Harman ‏@NeilHarmanTimes 44s
          Hold that last thought. It could be Murray v Bautista Agut in 3rd round. Sorry - nervous tension. Possible Nadal - Karlovic in rd 3!

          a izgleda da je ipak Marej-Nadal, Djokovic -Fed
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • #50
            Kakva konfuzija na tviteru u vezi moguci SF parova Izgleda na kraju Fed-Rafa

            Comment


            • #51
              Ipak je Fed-Rafa:
              Wimbledon ‏@Wimbledon 2m
              Last year's finalists Andy Murray and Novak Djokovic are drawn in the top half, with Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal in the bottom half.
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • #52
                gde je shminka, Cilic ce Berdiha da izbaci

                Ben Rothenberg ‏@BenRothenberg 1m
                Djokovic's quarter R32s:
                Djokovic-Pospisil
                Youzhny-Tsonga
                Gulbis-Verdasco
                Cilic-Berdych
                #Wimbledon
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Pješke

                  Očekivan žrijeb, bez ikakvih iznenadjenja

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Ben Rothenberg ‏@BenRothenberg 26s
                    Federer's quarter projected R32s:
                    Wawrinka-Tusunov
                    Lopez-Isner
                    Janowicz-Robredo
                    Granollers-Federer.

                    jedino Lopez, ali to je tek u QF
                    za sad Role ima fin zreb
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Kažem ja, al džabe, neće da slušaju
                      Last edited by pecaros; 20-06-14, 10:19.
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #56

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Ako je potpuno zdrav Novak je prakticno u finalu. U mecu Gulbis-Berdih prednost dajem Gulbisu, Dimitrov izbacuje Ferera. Druga polovina zreba mnogo teza: Federer, Nadal, Vavrinka, Izner, Raonic...

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Sreća pa ne namještaju žrijebove

                            da Golubev ima snage za 5 sati igre, bilo bi svega i u prvom kolu

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              ali zato Nadalova QF:
                              Nadal's quarter R32s:
                              Raonic-Garcia Lopez
                              Kohlschreiber-Nishikori
                              Gasquet-Monfils
                              Karlovic-Nadal.
                              #Wimbledon
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by skeptik View Post
                                Ako je potpuno zdrav Novak je prakticno u finalu. U mecu Gulbis-Berdih prednost dajem Gulbisu, Dimitrov izbacuje Ferera. Druga polovina zreba mnogo teza: Federer, Nadal, Vavrinka, Izner, Raonic...
                                Wawrinka, Izner, Raonic na travi?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X