Originally posted by shminka
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ATP World Tour Series 500 - 2013. godina
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Nije uzeo Masters, nije uzeo DC, jos nema isti broj titula, nije bio u TOP 3. Smatram da OSW nije dovoljno dobro da bi bio ispred Davida jos uvijek, a i H2H je brutalan, David ima duplo vise pobjeda. Ipak se slazem sa tobom, glupa rasprava, nema argumenata da je Del Potro bolji sem eto taj Slam.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostNije uzeo Masters, nije uzeo DC, jos nema isti broj titula, nije bio u TOP 3. Smatram da OSW nije dovoljno dobro da bi bio ispred Davida jos uvijek, a i H2H je brutalan, David ima duplo vise pobjeda.
Pa s obzirom da je taj isti Ferrer uzeo Masters u 30 godini, za Delpa ima vremena, i kako moze DC bitan u uporedjivanju pojedinaca kada je DC timsko takmicanje?!
Comment
-
Ali dok je imao Slam, a Murray nije, niko nije pricao da je bolji Del Potro, to mi je najjace
U ovom trenutku je David Ferrer bolji igrac, kvalitetniji, kompletniji. Ima vremena da ga pretekne, ne vidim nista sporno sem da je trenutno David bolji.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View Post
U ovom trenutku je David Ferrer bolji igrac, kvalitetniji, kompletniji. Ima vremena da ga pretekne, ne vidim nista sporno sem da je trenutno David bolji.Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.
Comment
-
Ma Ferer je cudo od deteta, poceo da igra svoj najbolji tenis kad se priblizio 30.-toj, kad su sve podloge toliko iste, da svuda moze da izrudari
Vladane, zasto ne uporedis Ferera sa 25. godina, koliko je tada imao titula i gde se nalazio na listi i Delpa, mislim da je to ipak malo realnije.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Ne mozemo stalno pricati o podlogama, da su podloge kao prije desetak godina ko zna sta bi bilo sa Nadalom i Djokovicem, tako je kako je.
Pricamo kakvo je stanje sad, sto vi kad se prepirete sa Nadalovcima ne uporedjujete Federera i Nadala sa 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 godina, Nadal ima bolje prolazno vrijeme. Povuci ce se crta na kraju karijere. Trenutno je po meni David bolji, nekom drugom je Del Potro. Mislim da nema dovoljno argumenata da je Del Potro bolji, dok je vise onih da je David bolji.sigpic
Comment
-
Delpo- osvojio GS
Ferer- nije osvojio GS
sad da obojica odu u penziju, Delpo bi imao uspesniju karijeru, to je sasvim dovoljan argument.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostZnaci da su 2011. Murray i Del Potro zavrsili karijeru, ti bi rekla Del Potro ide u istoriju kao bolji igrac?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment