Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATP World Tour Series 500 - 2013. godina

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by shminka View Post
    Delpo taj isti FH koristi u punom kapacitetu samo protiv najboljih...kamo srece da ga redovno moze udarati tako jako

    Glupe rasprave u zadnje vrijeme, bez ikakvih argumenata se tvrde neke stvari
    Slazem se, Ferrer TOP 3 igrac, Argentinac to nikad nije bio, ako ne uspije do kraja sezone nece ni biti. Bas glupa rasprava.
    sigpic

    Comment


    • Davida izuzetno cijenim, ali protiv cinjenica se ne moze...Delpo je 6 godina mladji, a osvojio je GS i po titulama ga je gotovo stigao...

      6 godina razlike Vladane...mada to sigurno u ovom slucaju nista ne znaci

      Comment


      • Nije uzeo Masters, nije uzeo DC, jos nema isti broj titula, nije bio u TOP 3. Smatram da OSW nije dovoljno dobro da bi bio ispred Davida jos uvijek, a i H2H je brutalan, David ima duplo vise pobjeda. Ipak se slazem sa tobom, glupa rasprava, nema argumenata da je Del Potro bolji sem eto taj Slam.
        sigpic

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
          Nije uzeo Masters, nije uzeo DC, jos nema isti broj titula, nije bio u TOP 3. Smatram da OSW nije dovoljno dobro da bi bio ispred Davida jos uvijek, a i H2H je brutalan, David ima duplo vise pobjeda.

          Pa s obzirom da je taj isti Ferrer uzeo Masters u 30 godini, za Delpa ima vremena, i kako moze DC bitan u uporedjivanju pojedinaca kada je DC timsko takmicanje?!

          Comment


          • Ali dok je imao Slam, a Murray nije, niko nije pricao da je bolji Del Potro, to mi je najjace

            U ovom trenutku je David Ferrer bolji igrac, kvalitetniji, kompletniji. Ima vremena da ga pretekne, ne vidim nista sporno sem da je trenutno David bolji.
            sigpic

            Comment


            • Znaci treba osvojiti masters, uci u TOP 3 i popraviti H2H...s pobjedama ce ga stici za par godina

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Vladan View Post

                U ovom trenutku je David Ferrer bolji igrac, kvalitetniji, kompletniji. Ima vremena da ga pretekne, ne vidim nista sporno sem da je trenutno David bolji.
                Ovom recenicom bi se mogla zakljuciti rasprava. Del Potro ima vremena da dokaze da onaj slem nije bio slucajnost i da poseduje kvalitet za velike titule, da pokaze konstantnost i da stize do zavrsnica velikih turnira u kontinuitetu. Do tada je samo OSW i nista vise od toga.
                Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

                Comment


                • Prle jos jedan komentar na forumase i ode ti na duzi odmor. Odgovori na ovo i racunaj da si van foruma mjesec dana. Na pm ako imas neke nedoumice.
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • Opet Delpovih 100% je bolje od Davidovih, to je jasno kao dan.
                    sloboda ili ništa

                    Comment


                    • Ma Ferer je cudo od deteta, poceo da igra svoj najbolji tenis kad se priblizio 30.-toj, kad su sve podloge toliko iste, da svuda moze da izrudari
                      Vladane, zasto ne uporedis Ferera sa 25. godina, koliko je tada imao titula i gde se nalazio na listi i Delpa, mislim da je to ipak malo realnije.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Ne mozemo stalno pricati o podlogama, da su podloge kao prije desetak godina ko zna sta bi bilo sa Nadalom i Djokovicem, tako je kako je.
                        Pricamo kakvo je stanje sad, sto vi kad se prepirete sa Nadalovcima ne uporedjujete Federera i Nadala sa 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 godina, Nadal ima bolje prolazno vrijeme. Povuci ce se crta na kraju karijere. Trenutno je po meni David bolji, nekom drugom je Del Potro. Mislim da nema dovoljno argumenata da je Del Potro bolji, dok je vise onih da je David bolji.
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • Delpo- osvojio GS
                          Ferer- nije osvojio GS

                          sad da obojica odu u penziju, Delpo bi imao uspesniju karijeru, to je sasvim dovoljan argument.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Znaci da su 2011. Murray i Del Potro zavrsili karijeru, ti bi rekla Del Potro ide u istoriju kao bolji igrac?
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
                              Znaci da su 2011. Murray i Del Potro zavrsili karijeru, ti bi rekla Del Potro ide u istoriju kao bolji igrac?
                              Bili bi blizu, zato sto Marej ipak ima vise mastersa od Ferera i imao je vise uspeha, ali ne bi imao slem, a Delpo bi imao, tako da bi moglo da se diskutuje.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Ови са врха кад им дође Давид мирно спавају, а кад виде да им је у следеој рунди Дел, не спавају од почетка турнира како треба...
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X