Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nole, idi u peršun!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ha,ha,ha...dobra si. Kada ostanes bez argumenta tu je dobar stari spin. Tezinski i vremenski je isto AUS-RG-WB-US i RG-WB-US + AUS. Razlika je samo sto se ono zove kalendarska godina a ovo drugo 12 meseci. To je forma, sustinski je isto.

    Comment


    • Nije sustinski isto, ovo je nova sezona, mentalno se drugacije priprema i sprema i igraci ipak dolaze skroz svezi i zdravi na AUS, za razliku od USO gde je to vec uveliko druga polovina sezone, bez nekih vecih pauza, mentalno je to mnogo teze.
      Nema nikakvog spina...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Vremenski prozor izmedju USA-AUS je 5 meseci, vremenski prozor izmedju AUS-RG je 5 meseci sa tom razlikom da posle US imas i WTF.

        Comment


        • Jednostavno nije isto, sta sve imas izmedju AUS i RG, a sta sve imas USO i AUS, plus sto je ovde kraj sezone i jos jednom ponavljam, drugaciji su igraci na AUS, mentalno su sveziji u odnosu na USO
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Evo opet. Kada ostanes bez argumenata samo kazes "jednostavno nije isto" i to je to. Tezinski i vremenski je isto AUS-RG-WB-US i RG-WB-US + AUS. Razlika je samo sto se ono zove kalendarska godina a ovo drugo 12 meseci.

            Comment


            • U cemu je ralizka izmedju tvog isto je i mog nije isto?
              Kako je moje spin, a tvoje je argumentovana rasprava?
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Iskreno nevezano za ovu diskusiju, ja imam osecaj da se u blizoj buducnosti (10-15 godina) da se pojavi neko ko ce da osvoji sva 4 slema u istoj godini ili da veze 5 ili 6 slemva.
                Pogloge su ujednacene, i jedini razlog sto se to nije desilo do sada je zbog Nadala na sljaci. Ima i Novak ove godine sansu, ali morao bi bas da bude na maksimumu u Francuskoj.

                Comment


                • Vrlo prosto. Ja kazem da je tezinski i vremenski isto AUS-RG-WB-US i RG-WB-US + AUS. Razlika je samo sto se ono zove kalendarska godina a ovo drugo 12 meseci. Ti mislis drugacije. Daj cinjenice a ne "jednostavno nije tako". Demantuj me cinjenicama.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by skeptik View Post
                    Vrlo prosto. Ja kazem da je tezinski i vremenski isto AUS-RG-WB-US i RG-WB-US + AUS. Razlika je samo sto se ono zove kalendarska godina a ovo drugo 12 meseci. Ti mislis drugacije. Daj cinjenice a ne "jednostavno nije tako". Demantuj me cinjenicama.
                    Pa ja sam dala cinjenice, igraci su fizicki i mentalno sveziji na AUS nego na USO.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • To nisu cinjenice nego tvoje subjektivno misljenje. Na osnovu kojih cinjenica si dosla do tog zakljucka samo nemoj opet "jednostavno to je tako"?

                      Comment


                      • Po meni nema veze sto je vremenska odrednica ista, kalendarska godina je kalendarska godina, tako se neke stvari odredjuju i klasifikuju, a sto kaze cssr Nole Slem je najlepse [emoji41]
                        sigpic

                        Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
                        But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by skeptik View Post
                          To nisu cinjenice nego tvoje subjektivno misljenje. Na osnovu kojih cinjenica si dosla do tog zakljucka samo nemoj opet "jednostavno to je tako"?
                          Na osnovu izjava tenisera, doduse po tebi je i to subjektivno misljenje.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Ok. Ako cemo izjave tenisera ubuduce da tretiramo kao cinjenice neka bude tako.

                            Comment


                            • i posle ja spinujem
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by 147 View Post
                                Iskreno nevezano za ovu diskusiju, ja imam osecaj da se u blizoj buducnosti (10-15 godina) da se pojavi neko ko ce da osvoji sva 4 slema u istoj godini ili da veze 5 ili 6 slemva.
                                Pogloge su ujednacene, i jedini razlog sto se to nije desilo do sada je zbog Nadala na sljaci. Ima i Novak ove godine sansu, ali morao bi bas da bude na maksimumu u Francuskoj.
                                Pa moze se reci da je Nadal bio najveca prepreka, jer niko tako nije dominantan na nekoj podlozi kao on sto je na sljaci. Ali mislim da bi ipak bilo najpostenije reci da bi sigurno sva trojica imali kalendarski slem da nisu imali jedni druge za rivale.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X