Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nole, idi u peršun!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
    hm, ovo vise lici na paniku nego na promisljenu reakciju
    Slazem se Bojana da iz ove izjave bas tako i izgleda. Samo mi nije jasno zasto je odmah Djokovic tako reagirao. Inace sto se same saradnje tice treba ostaviti vremena da se vidi kako ce to sve ici. Moje licno misljenje je da Djokovicu treba kao trener stabilna licnost koja bice sposobna da ga drzi na zemlji u svakakavim situacijama, bez strasti i emocije, jer ih sam ima dosta. Dali je Beker ta licnost ne bih mogla da znam. Teniski on je vec kompletan i izgradjen i zaista sem nekih finesa koje treba popraviti, ne znam sta ga Beker moze nauciti, a da pritom ne narusi njegov stil igre. Takticki pristup igre mozda. . .Videcemo, promena nije losa stvar, a verujem da za ove promene postoji dobar razlog.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by pecaros View Post
      ^
      BB vec poceo odradjivati jedan od poslova /citaj PR/ za koji je angazovan.
      pa reagovanja su poprilicno losa na ovu vest:

      Rob Koenig ‏@RobKoenigTennis
      Was it a knee jerk reaction after losing #1 ranking?? Cos Novak finished the year like the best player in the world...
      Tumaini ‏@tumcarayol 30m
      Novak demanding change and calling up Boris Becker the second he lost his #1 ranking is a bit dramatic
      a valjda je uzeo novog trenera, a ne dvorsku ludu
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
        pa reagovanja su poprilicno losa na ovu vest:
        a valjda je uzeo novog trenera, a ne dvorsku ludu
        Sto se mene tice neka javno navlaci i gace preko glave, njegova stvar.
        Englezi ionako crkose od ljubomore a do njihovih komentara mi stalo kao do ove maglustine.
        sigpic

        Comment


        • Ja mislim da su svi vise iznenadjeni, da se cude i da su skepticni, nego sto su ljubomorni.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Odmah po objavi imenovanja BB-a krenula su poredjenja sa Lendlom i vecina komentara potice sa ostrva. Osnovano mogu sumnjati u dobronamernost proisteklu iz tih komenatara. Engleski skepticizam prema BB-u nije zabrinutost za Novakovu buducnost vecma za Endijevu.
            sigpic

            Comment


            • Pa logicno da je krenulo poredjenje sa Marejem i Lendlom, kad nigde drugde nemamo takvu kombinaciju trener-igrac
              Ako kojim slucajem Edberg postane Roletov trener, iste te price ce se pricati, nista cudno
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Sa Edbergom slicna prica kao sa Bekerom. Jednako kao Beker i Edberg bi posluzio kao magnet za medije, zarad skidanja pritiska sa igraca. Uzgred, ako do te saradnje dodje cemu bi to Edberg poducavao RF-a, SV igri i izlascima na mrezu
                sigpic

                Comment


                • Da, Roletu bas treba magnet za medije
                  A druga stvar, Edberg je isuvise povucen, sad je dao intervju i nije hteo nista da kaze sta je pricao sa Rogerom, samo da su radili zajedno nedelju dana i da je Roger od njega trazio povratne informacije i da su o svemu otvoreno pricali.
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                    Da, Roletu bas treba magnet za medije
                    A druga stvar, Edberg je isuvise povucen, sad je dao intervju i nije hteo nista da kaze sta je pricao sa Rogerom, samo da su radili zajedno nedelju dana i da je Roger od njega trazio povratne informacije i da su o svemu otvoreno pricali.
                    Ovaj put si izvukla reci iz konteksta.

                    `Sa Edbergom slicna prica kao sa Bekerom. Jednako kao Beker i Edberg bi posluzio kao magnet za medije, zarad skidanja pritiska sa igraca.`
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by pecaros View Post
                      Ovaj put si izvukla reci iz konteksta.

                      `Sa Edbergom slicna prica kao sa Bekerom. Jednako kao Beker i Edberg bi posluzio kao magnet za medije, zarad skidanja pritiska sa igraca.`
                      Pa procitaj do kraja, Edberg nije Beker, nikad on nece isticati sebe u prvi plan, a i Roger nije neko ko funkcionise tako da stavlja trenera u prvi plan.
                      Tako da ako dodje do saradnje Roger-Edberg, razlog sigurno nece biti skidanje pritiska sa igraca.

                      A i ako Roletu posle 15-16 godina na tour-u, svega kroz sta je prosao, treba neko ko ce da mu skida pritisak, onda
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by pecaros View Post
                        Odmah po objavi imenovanja BB-a krenula su poredjenja sa Lendlom i vecina komentara potice sa ostrva. Osnovano mogu sumnjati u dobronamernost proisteklu iz tih komenatara. Engleski skepticizam prema BB-u nije zabrinutost za Novakovu buducnost vecma za Endijevu.
                        Veruj ti meni da si ti Englezi oni koji najvise pljuju po Endiju i prvi ce ga uvek napadati. Bole Engleze ona stvar za ljubomoru, oni samo zive od traceva, pljuvanja svakog koga stignu i omalovazavanja svega.

                        Ako je ovo istina, onda veoma ocajan potez Beckera , ne vidim sta je hteo da postigne. U principu uvek sam za eksperimentisanje ( u granicama normale) ionako je Vajda izgubio svrhu i postao lutka koja tapse, ali stvarno ne vidim sta ce dobiti Novak sa Beckerom. Njemu treba neko ko je uvek bio gladan trofeja a pritom imao neverovatnu disciplinu. Bolju osobu za taj posao od Lendla, ne vidim
                        It's not who you are underneath, it's what you do that defines you

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                          Pa procitaj do kraja, Edberg nije Beker, nikad on nece isticati sebe u prvi plan, a i Roger nije neko ko funkcionise tako da stavlja trenera u prvi plan.
                          Tako da ako dodje do saradnje Roger-Edberg, razlog sigurno nece biti skidanje pritiska sa igraca.

                          A i ako Roletu posle 15-16 godina na tour-u, svega kroz sta je prosao, treba neko ko ce da mu skida pritisak, onda
                          Bas se Role napatio za tih 15,16 godina , sam bez igde ikoga.
                          Edberg bi svakako preuzeo na sebe deo medijskog pritiska. Iluzorno je i pomisliti da Role uziva bas u svakom kontaktu sa javnoscu.
                          Posto je tematika usla u sferu futuristickog ne bih dalje gledao u buducnost
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • Bb7PHvKIgAApmab.jpg

                            Ekipa na okupu
                            * Victory makes you happy, failure makes you stronger!
                            * Smeš da izgubiš, ali ne smeš da se predaš!
                            NOVAK ĐOKOVIĆ #TrueChampion

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by prskaj View Post
                              Bolju osobu za taj posao od Lendla, ne vidim
                              Spoiler


                              “It's no accident, I think, that tennis uses the language of life. Advantage, service, fault, break, love, the basic elements of tennis are those of everyday existence, because every match is a life in miniature. Points become games become sets become tournaments, and it's all so tightly connected that any point can become the turning point. It reminds me of the way seconds become minutes become hours, and any hour can be our finest. Or darkest. It's our choice.”

                              Comment


                              • ma kakav Borg, taj svakog meseca menja misljenje
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X