Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tenis
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Del Potro je ovaj mec danas izgubio krajem drugog ( kada nije uspeo slomiti Feda iako je bio bolji) i pocetkom treceg (kada je imao opasnih prilika za brejk) . posle 6-6 u trecem bilo je egal, s tim da je u pocetku , Fed lakse ( mnoooogo lakse) uzimao svoje gemove, ali se Delpo sjajnom pozrtvovanoscu vracao i spasavao brejk lopte pa pravio ribrejk kada je Federer prvi put servirao za mec, pa opet spasavao brejk lopte, dok je Svajcarac vrlo sigurno drzao svoj servis (u ponekom gemu Delpo bi stizao do djusa ali to bi bilo sve) ne dozvolivsi svom protivniku ni jednu brejk loptu. Taman kada sam se zabrinuo za Novakov mec, Federer koristi delpove gluposti, a sebi ne dozvoljava istu gresku drugi put i zavrsava ovaj maraton... Sve u svemu odlican mec (barem sto se tice neizvesnosti i teniske dramaturgije) ,.... kvalitet na nivou polufinala olimijskog turnira.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by Indigo View PostAjde ovako. TI znas koliko se Novak napali kada igra za Srbiju? Znas li sta znace olimpijske igre?
Meni uopste nije bitno bilo da Federer izgubi bitno mi je da Novak pobedi pa da se vrate stari dugovi.
Novak ima svoje sanse, fantasticno servira i sam si video a kao i Federeru desavaju mu se oscilacije u igri.
Pobedice onaj koji bude znao da iskoristi oscilacije drugog u datom trenutku.
Ono sto je Rogeru donelo pobedu na WB-u bila je sledeca kombinacija.
Slice na Novakov BH... Novak gadja Bh paralelu... Roger izvlaci Fh cross court dijagonalu i end of story.
Ovaoga puta je sigurno naucio i tu lekciju.
Comment
-
Originally posted by S-Nash View PostA da nije 96%?There's something wrong with me chemically
Something wrong with me inherently
The wrong mix in the wrong genes
I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
It was the wrong plan
In the wrong hands
With the wrong theory for the wrong man
The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
The wrong questions with the wrong replies
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostBilo bi nezasluzeno da je dobio DP. Bilo bi nefer prema Rodzeru.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by shminka View PostNek Delpo samo nekako osvoji DC ove godine i sljedece ce biti pravi...pobjeda za Argentinu bi mu bas puno znacila
Rogerov prime je bio 2004-2007. 2009 godine mu se dosta stvari poklopilo. Roger u primeu je najbolji igrač, to je bar neosporivo.
@NI, apsolutno. Federer je sada bolji igrač nego 2009.
I da, ko god da je danas pobijedio ne bi bilo nezasluženo. Momci su pružili fantastičan tenis i dokazali da su obojica prije svega veliki šampioni. Svaka čast, sa uživanjem sam pratio ovaj meč.“It's no accident, I think, that tennis uses the language of life. Advantage, service, fault, break, love, the basic elements of tennis are those of everyday existence, because every match is a life in miniature. Points become games become sets become tournaments, and it's all so tightly connected that any point can become the turning point. It reminds me of the way seconds become minutes become hours, and any hour can be our finest. Or darkest. It's our choice.”
Comment
-
Sasvim je jasno zasto je Fed ovoliko oduzio 3. set, sad je oborio i rekord po najduzem mec koji se igra na 2 dobijena
za best of 5 Izner i Mahut su postavili zadali preveliki domacihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheZIX90 View PostBrate a ti vec vidis Novaka u finalu,kao da je Marej pacer.Igrao je najbolje od svih ove OI i ti vidis Novaka kao sigurnog pobednika.E to je ne volim ovde i zato pisem kao pesimista,samo zbog toga.Ljudi nije sigurna Novakova pobeda nikako...sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by AK47 View PostCuj bilo bi nepravedno da dobije covjek koji je dobio svaku jacu izmjenu ,e sta ovdje covjek nece cuti...sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostNisam previse gledao, mozda nekih 10-ak gemova na kraju. Federer iskljucivo servisom uzimao gemove, Delpo morao na mnogo tezi nacin, kroz igru. Ma gotovo je to, prosralo ga je i nema stajanja, predodredjen je da osvoji.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Prle! View PostTada na scenu stupa David Nalbandian.
Rogerov prime je bio 2004-2007. 2009 godine mu se dosta stvari poklopilo. Roger u primeu je najbolji igrač, to je bar neosporivo.
@NI, apsolutno. Federer je sada bolji igrač nego 2009.
I da, ko god da je danas pobijedio ne bi bilo nezasluženo. Momci su pružili fantastičan tenis i dokazali da su obojica prije svega veliki šampioni. Svaka čast, sa uživanjem sam pratio ovaj meč.Zeljko Malnar-Nocna mora <3
#the return
Comment
Comment