Tweet
Seoski, ovde se bolje vidi njen šorc, nego njegove patike. 
-
sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion. -
A znam, al' reko mozda ce neko da prepozna patike, nemam sta da izgubim.Originally posted by miloolja View PostSeoski, ovde se bolje vidi njen šorc, nego njegove patike.
Comment
-
Taj crno beli snimak je iz Sidneja 1970, kada je Lejver slavio 3-2, uz 16 duplih servis gresaka zbog bola u ledjima
Dvadesetak dana ranije Rozvel je usao u istoriju tako sto je dobio prvi teniski mec igran u Rojal Albert Holu, starom skoro 100 godina, gde je otprilike vidjeno sve sto je moglo da se vidi, osim tenisaPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpicComment
-
Sta glume ovi teniski savezi.....ne daju Rohusu Belgijanci, a Koliju Nemci da idu na OI
Comment
-
a zbog cega im ne daju ???Comment
-
-
Nije samo Top 25 u pitanju.. traze im i druge stvariPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpicComment
-
Koji igraci kada dostignu svoj form peak odnosno top level mogu igrati na pribliznom nivou velike trojke(cetvorke)?
Da vas cujem.There's something wrong with me chemically
Something wrong with me inherently
The wrong mix in the wrong genes
I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
It was the wrong plan
In the wrong hands
With the wrong theory for the wrong man
The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
The wrong questions with the wrong repliesComment
-
Rezultati sve pokazuju.. niti takvih ima niti to mogu da rade u kontinuitetu duzem od par nedelja
Mozemo samo da nagadjamo i navodimo igrace koje volimoPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpicComment
-
Pa uzimajuci u obzir i da im top forma traje mesec dana. Nebitno, zanima me samo lista.There's something wrong with me chemically
Something wrong with me inherently
The wrong mix in the wrong genes
I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
It was the wrong plan
In the wrong hands
With the wrong theory for the wrong man
The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
The wrong questions with the wrong repliesComment
-
Samo bi da kazem nesto na post NI u temi RG.Svaka cast majstore,sve besprijekorno uradjeno i analiza meca.
Samo jednu stvar zamjeram,koju cak ni Fedovi navijaci nisu toliko potencirali a svi znamo kakav je Fed kada je TOP Formi,a to neko cekanje da Novak udje u ritam i kada udje mec zavrsen.I to sa bukvalno sve zavisi od njega.
Ne sporim ja da je Novak agresivniji,ali nekoga pobjediti 19 puta reci tako meni nije najjasnije.
Rijetke su situacije da kada jedan igra TOP da ce i ovaj drugi,i ja mogu reci sta bi bilo da je Nadal nastavio kao u ona prva 3 gema..
Rafa reda pobjede a cekamo da Nole dostigne TOPComment
-
Hvala FC Nadal.
Mozda ja zivim u iluziji. Mozda Novakova proslogodisnja forma nije ponovljiva. Ipak, poslije onih osam uzastopnih gemova imam pravo da vjerujem da se ne radi o iluziji.
Rafa je nekada bio bolji od Novaka. Zato je onih 19 pobjeda. Danas vise nije. Danasnjih 19:14 su jednom bili 14:4.Comment
-
-
A Blake postao tata
Comment
-
jos jedan novopeceni penzioner
34 year-old French fighter & 2001 @australiaopen finalist Arnaud Clément has officially announced his retirementhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
Comment