Evo, htece sigurno jos neko da se ukljuci. Ako je Sampras u finalu 1999. hodao po vodi ne znam kako opisati ovo Federerovo izdanje.. znao sam da je bio dobar ali ne bas ovoliko, 85 minuta od pocetka meca on je jos uvek na 3 neiznudjene greske!! Mozda i najbolji debi nekog igraca u Grand Slam finalima u Open eri
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Evo, htece sigurno jos neko da se ukljuci. Ako je Sampras u finalu 1999. hodao po vodi ne znam kako opisati ovo Federerovo izdanje.. znao sam da je bio dobar ali ne bas ovoliko, 85 minuta od pocetka meca on je jos uvek na 3 neiznudjene greske!! Mozda i najbolji debi nekog igraca u Grand Slam finalima u Open eriPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
-
Pa ljudi uopste nisu svesni Federorove velicine, posebno kad mu uslovi odgovaraju, vec po default-u osporavaju njegove protivnike. Te godine samo ga je Nalbandian sprecio da ode do jos dalje, ne znam da li bi dosao do slama ali bi na AO i USO mogao daleko da nije naisao na svog tadasnjeg nemezisa.
Onda je dosta unapredio svoj BH, poceo igrati dosta ostrije sa tog krila. Mada i dalje je FH bio zaduzen za 80-90% vinera. Falio mu je bolji BH tokom 2003. za vece uspehe na slamovima van Wimbledona.
EDIT: Vidi nakon ove analize da odradis mec izmedju Corie i Nadala u Rimu 2005. Jedan od najboljih meceva na sljaci svih vremena.Last edited by Prototype; 27-12-13, 23:15.
Comment
-
Moram da zavrsim analizu mladih igraca u 2013. i prevedem je na engleski, to mi je dosadilo pa sam prekratio vreme ovim mecom i uzivacu do samog kraja. Nije Mark mogao da mu napada bekhend konstantno, sve je od Rodzera zavisilo. A cak i da jeste, tog dana jednostavno nista nije mogao da promasi, posebno kad mu se otvori cak i najmanji prostor za forhend dijagonalu.. samo bi je zavrnuo a Marku bi ostalo da je prati pogledom. Skolski primer igranja na jos uvek kakvoj takvoj travi
Uh, ni manje ni vise nego Rim 2005. iako sam obecao prskaju Masters Kup 2005. bilo bi previse da radim Federera dva puta za redom, neka bude taj mec iako ce mi trebati bas mnogo vremena da ga odradim kako valjaPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
Comment
-
Finale Rima 2005. godine je po meni savrsenstvo kad je u pitanju sljaka. Svaki aspekt tenisa je vidjen, ko da su najkompletniji igraci ikada vidjeni. Coria imao nevidjen osecaj za drop-shot, pritom stabilan sa oba krila, dobra defanziva, ume da napada, brz... naravno servis taraba ali ne mozes sve imati
Ja stvarno ne znam da li sam gledao bolji mec na sljaci, onako pravo "sljakerski". Nije bilo previse baloniranja, vec imalo gomilu ostrih udaraca, izlazaka na mrezu, izbacivanje protivnika u prve redove tribina sa kratkim dijagonalama, drop-shotovi, dugacke razmene pune naboja, dosta preokreta...
Po meni taj je mec mnogo bolji od onog meca koji se odigrao sledece godine. Iako su se 2006. susreli razliciti tip igraca i bilo je interesantnih poena. Ali svaki ljubitelj tenisa koji voli igru na sljaci odabrace finale iz 2005. nego li iz 2006.
Comment
-
Dolgo se konacno resio trenera klovna a valjda ce i Santoro kao novi trener isterati klovna iz njega.
http://bit.ly/191XUXXsigpic
Comment
-
Tipsarevic nece igrati AO:
Tipsarević se povukao sa AOhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Ma taj ceka da mu se porodi zena, bas njega briga za tenis.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
mogu samo da zamislim kakav ce ovo dubl da bude
Neil Harman @NeilHarmanTimes
Doubles at the @AustralianOpen includes @DreddyTennis & @Gael_Monfils together. Hold on to your straw hats!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Jos jedno povlacenje sa AOa
LetsTalkTennis @letstalktennis1
Jürgen Melzer has withdrawn from the @AustralianOpen with a shoulder injury (via @SkySportsNews) #atphttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Ostaje da jos uradim statistiku i ispravim slova u poslednjem delu teksta, ali to mora da ceka do sutra posto me bole oci. Potrudio sam se oko prvog dela, da sto bolje docaram zanimljiv turnir gde se osmorka od 1/4 borila za prvu vimbldonsku titulu. Prilicno sam ubedjen da je ovo najbolje izdanje nekog igraca u Open eri prilikom osvajanja prve Grand Slam titule, Federer je bio skoro savrsen, sa 10 do 15 neiznudjenih gresaka po mecu, a u finalu je, iako debitant, igrao sa psihom Borga ili Samprasa
http://www.profesionalnitenis.com/fi...7-65-6-2-7-63/Last edited by ClayWarrior; 06-01-14, 16:44.Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
Comment
Comment