Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Serena je isla na 4 Slama u godini i zasluzeno je osvojila. Djoko nikad nije isao na 4 Slama jer bi vec na drugom pukao.
    Drugi bitan faktor je da je Serena Amerikanka a oni posebno gledaju na svoje sportase. A i napravila je puno vecu karijeru.
    Sto se tice sporta Messi je neprikosnoven.

    Comment


    • just yesterday she was last in the SI polls
      Toliko o tome.

      Neka kazu americka nagrada, ne internacionalna i sve ce biti ok.

      Novak je kao i 2011. bez premca najbolji sportista planete. Bolt i Hamilton mogu da mu pariraju donekle, ljudi koji ruzno dominiraju kao on.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • Originally posted by tenis View Post
        Serena je isla na 4 Slama u godini i zasluzeno je osvojila. Djoko nikad nije isao na 4 Slama jer bi vec na drugom pukao.
        Drugi bitan faktor je da je Serena Amerikanka a oni posebno gledaju na svoje sportase. A i napravila je puno vecu karijeru.
        Sto se tice sporta Messi je neprikosnoven.
        I šta veliš Serena išla po 4 slema a Novak ne. Ponekad je bolje udariiti se po prstima pre nego počneš maltretirati tastaturu ili ti ispeci pa reci
        sigpic

        Comment


        • U kom svetu je Djokovic isao po 4 slema kad je izgubio na RGu...
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • U ovom u kome trenutno obitavamo.
            A u kom svetu Serena ima prednost jer je eto kao mogla do kalendarskog slema pa ipak nije.
            Gde se to sama namera vrednuje više od stvarnih rezultata?
            sigpic

            Comment


            • Pa ona je imala sansu da dodje do kalendarskog slema jer je stigla sa 3 osvojena na USO, Djokovic je stigao sa 2 osvojena i to je ogromna razlika.
              Dakle, Djokovic je mozda isao na kalendarski slem, ali je prso vec posle 2.slema u godini.
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Dođosmo dakle do krucijalnog dela cele priče.
                Serena je imala šansu koju nije iskoristila te joj se za to ima dati nagrada.
                Svi koji verovaše kako se vrednuje samo ukupan zbir rezultata u sezoni bili su u velikoj zabludi jer treba računati i šanse
                sigpic

                Comment


                • Kad sam ja rekla da je ona zasluzila nagradu?
                  Ja sam te samo pitala u kom svetu je Djokovic isao na kalendarski slem kad je pukao na RGu?
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Opet velim u ovom svetu u kom trenutno obitavamo. Namera je postojala ali nije ostvarena. Uostalom pre reakcije trebalo je pažljivije pročitati inicijalni post ove besmislene diskusije.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • Zna se sta znaci kad neko ide po kalendarski slem, to znaci da je osvojio 3 slema i da juri USO, kakva namera, kakve gluposti...
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Neko ko je poput Novaka može sebi dozvoliti planiranje kalendarskog slem na početku sezone. Druga stvar je da li je imao šansu ali da je na njega išao to je evidentno.
                        tenis je potencirao ideju kako je Serena zaslužila nagradu jer je išla na '4 Slama' dok Novak nije. Pošto je takva argumentacija za ovu priliku bezvezna usledila je moja reakcija dok su pobude tvoje vrlo upitne.
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • Kao prvo, sansa da Djokovic dobije ovu nagradu je minimalna, jer su do sada samo par puta dobijali sportisti koji nisu Amerikanci, tako da ni on nije imao realnu sansu. Meni je licno iznenadjenje sto je Serena dobila, jer tenis nije nesto preterano popularan u Americi i definitivno nisam videla nju kao pobednika.
                          A druga stvar, ja ti govorim da je tehnicki neizvodljivo da se za nekog ko osvoji 2 slema do USOa, kaze da ide na kalendarski slem. A tvoj je problem sto u svakom postu koji ti ne odgovara vidis neke lose pobude i svetske zavere...

                          Uostalom, ceo dan po tviteru se prica o tome kako je konj vise zasluzio tu nagradu od Serene...mogu samo da zamislim naslove i raspravu da je Djokovic osvojio, a da se potegla ta prica, kao sto bi se 100% potegla
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Dva su pojma sve vreme diskusije bila u opticaju: išao(išla) i šansa. Ovaj prvi kako već rekoh beše meni povodom na repliku tenisu.
                            Sve o čemu sam pisao bilo je vezano za taj pojam. Edukovanje u pravcu šanse Novaka za kalendarski slem nalazim kao apsolutno nepotrebno. Bahati i nepriličan ulazak u diskusiju ' :U kom to svetu.. ' sasvim dovoljno govori o nečijim pobudama ulaska u istu.
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • Grisa sledece godine ide na kalendarski slem, ima nameru
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Svi idu a samo jedan ima šansu da to i ostvari i to ne kalendarski nego zlatni
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X