Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OI nisu obavezan turnir, nisu nikad ni bile.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Znaci sada je raskinuta i svaka formalna veza sa ITF-om, ako nema bodovanja.

      Comment


      • Koliko vidim, glavni razlog je taj sto je ITF odbio da pomogne turnire koji se igraju u isto vreme kad i OI, pa pretpostavljam da je ovo neki kompromis, nece dati pare drugim turnirima ali ni nema poena za OI.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • 750 bodova je Murray dobio za zlato, nije malo

          Comment


          • MercedesCup ‏@MercedesCup
            Tennis sensation in #Stuttgart! Tennis giant Roger Federer will headline the field for the #MercedesCup2016 AND 2017


            celu nedelju mogu da ostanem
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • 16 terena ce biti strimovano sa AOa

              http://www.ausopen.com/news/2015/09/...broadcast-deal
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment



              • Comment


                • Za takvu statistiku je bitno postaviti i koliko je ko imao takvih poena, tj izlazaka
                  It's not who you are underneath, it's what you do that defines you

                  Comment


                  • Dakle, ključ odlične sezone je igra na mreži za Rafu

                    čestitamo

                    Comment


                    • Najbolje sezone (omjer pobjeda i poraza)

                      Doslo je vrijeme procjene koliko je dobra Novakova sezona. Jedna od mjera je omjer pobjeda u poraza. U open je bilo 23 takve sezone. Novakova 2015. je sesta.

                      Code:
                      1	McEnroe		1984	82	3	96.47%
                      2	Federer		2005	81	4	95.29%
                      3	Connors		1974	99	5	95.19%	Idem sa 5 Konorsovih poraza, iako ima onih koji kazu da su bila samo 4.
                      4	Federer		2006	92	5	94.85%
                      5	Borg		1979	84	6	93.33%
                      6	Novak		2015	82	6	93.18%
                      7	Federer		2004	74	6	92.50%
                      8	Lendl		1986	74	6	92.50%
                      9	Lendl		1985	84	7	92.31%
                      10	Lendl		1982	106	9	92.17%
                      11	Borg		1980	70	6	92.11%
                      12	Novak		2011	70	6	92.11%
                      13	Connors		1976	91	8	91.92%
                      14	Lendl		1989	79	7	91.86%
                      15	Connors		1975	78	7	91.76%
                      16	Connors		1978	66	6	91.67%
                      17	Borg		1977	76	7	91.57%
                      18	Borg		1978	76	7	91.57%
                      19	Nadal		2013	75	7	91.46%
                      20	Lendl		1987	74	7	91.36%
                      21	Vilas		1977	140	14	90.91%
                      22	McEnroe		1985	74	8	90.24%
                      23	Laver		1969	45	5	90.00%
                      Broj sezona sa preko 90% dobijenih meceva za pojedine igarce.

                      Code:
                      Lendl	5
                      Connors	4
                      Borg	4
                      Federer	3
                      McEnroe	2
                      Novak	2
                      Nadal	1
                      Laver	1
                      Vilas	1
                      Uvijek me iznenade ovih Lendlovih 5.

                      U ovoj konkurencije je Mekinroova 1984. najbolja!
                      Last edited by NI; 23-11-15, 08:49.

                      Comment


                      • Najbolje sezone (GS rezultati)

                        Code:
                        			W	F	SF	QF	16	32
                        1	Laver	1969	4					
                        2	Federer	2006	3	1				
                        2	Federer	2007	3	1				
                        2	Novak	2015	3	1				
                        5	Novak	2011	3		1			
                        6	Wiland.	1988	3			1		
                        6	Nadal	2010	3			1		
                        8	Federer	2004	3					1
                        9	Connors	1974	3					
                        10	Federer	2009	2	2				
                        11	Lendl	1987	2	1	1			
                        12	Lendl	1986	2	1						Igrala su se 3 slema				
                        13	Agassi	1999	2	1			1	
                        14	Villas	1977	2	1				1		Igralo se 5 slemova
                        15	Borg	1978	2	1				
                        15	Borg	1980	2	1				
                        15	McEnroe	1984	2	1				
                        15	Sampras	1995	2	1				
                        19	Federer	2005	2		2			
                        19	Nadal	2008	2		2			
                        20	Sampras	1993	2		1	1		
                        21	Becker	1989	2		1		1	
                        22	Borg	1979	2		1			
                        23	Nadal	2013	2
                        Novakova 2015. dijeli mjesto sa dvije Federerove, a 2011. je peta. Fascinira da Federer ima 5 sezona.

                        Kao i u svemu drugom, Lendl nije imao srece. Kad je bio na vrhuncu, igrala su se samo 3 slema.

                        Comment


                        • NI, kralju statistike kad vec izbacujes ove tabele napravi jednu po pobedama nad TOP 5 i TOP10 igarcima u sezoni. Bas me zanima kako se kotira Novakova 2015 po procentima u odnosu na druge.

                          EDIT:Nasao sam nesto sam i uporedio sezone Novaka, Nadala i Federera.

                          Novak 2015 ima omer 31:5 protiv TOP 10 i 16:4 protiv TOP 5.
                          Novak 2011 ima omer 21:4 protiv TOP 10 i 13:3 protiv TOP 5.

                          Novakova sveukupno gledano 2015 je bolja od 2011 ali to je posledice povrede dobijene na mecu DC protiv Argentnine sto je imalo za posledicu slabiji zavrsetak sezone.

                          Nadal 2013 ima omer 24:5 protiv TOP 10 i 12:5 protiv TOP 5.
                          Nadal 2010 ima omer 11:5 protiv TOP 10 i 5:3 protiv TOP 5.

                          Po ovome nesumnjivo Nadalova 2013 je bolja od 2010, igracki gledano.

                          Federer 2006 ima omer 19:5 protiv TOP 10 i 8:4 protiv TOP 5.
                          Federer 2007 ima omer 17:4 protiv TOP 10 i 9:3 protiv TOP 5.

                          Priblizno dve izjednacene sezone.
                          Last edited by skeptik; 23-11-15, 11:43.

                          Comment


                          • Najbolje sezone (broj bodova)

                            Ovo moze izgledati kao najmanje bitan faktor, a on je zaparavo najbitnijer otkriva pravu snagu igraca. Da to ilustrujem a i da odgovorim na skeptikov pitanje dajem donju tabelu. Ona pokazuje postotak meceva odigranih protiv prvih 10 u odnosu na totani broj meceva. Uzeo sam samo igarace u sezonama koje su pobrojane gore:

                            Code:
                            1	Novak	2015	88	36	40.9%
                            2	Nadal	2013	82	29	35.4%
                            3	Nadal	2013	82	29	35.4%
                            4	Federer	2009	73	25	34.2%
                            5	Novak	2011	76	25	32.9%
                            6	Borg	1980	76	21	27.6%
                            7	Federer	2007	77	21	27.3%
                            8	McEnroe	1984	85	23	27.1%
                            9	Nadal	2008	93	23	24.7%
                            10	Sampras	1995	88	21	23.9%
                            11	Lendl	1986	84	20	23.8%
                            12	Federer	2006	97	23	23.7%
                            13	Lendl	1987	76	18	23.7%
                            14	Agassi	1999	77	18	23.4%
                            15	Federer	2004	80	18	22.5%
                            16	Borg	1978	90	19	21.1%
                            17	Becker	1989	72	15	20.8%
                            18	Federer	2005	85	17	20.0%
                            19	Borg	1979	85	17	20.0%
                            20	Nadal	2010	81	16	19.8%
                            21	Sampras	1993	101	19	18.8%
                            22	Wiland.	1988	64	10	15.6%
                            23	Villas	1977	140	18	12.9%
                            24	Connors	1974	96	8	8.3%
                            25	Laver	1969	50	N/V
                            Kao sto vidite, Novak je ove godine igrao 40.9% meceve protiv top 10 a Konors 1974. samo 8.3%. Prilicna razlika. Naravno broj bodova nije proporcionalan tome ali daje odredjenu indikaciju. U Lejeverovo vrijeme nije bilo rankinga.

                            Ovo samo za skeptika. Postotak dobijenih meceva protiv top 10:

                            Code:
                            1	Federer	2004	18	0	100.0%
                            2	McEnroe	1984	22	1	95.7%
                            3	Borg	1980	19	2	90.5%
                            4	Federer	2007	19	2	90.5%
                            5	Borg	1978	17	2	89.5%
                            6	Lendl	1987	16	2	88.9%
                            7	Federer	2005	15	2	88.2%
                            8	Borg	1979	15	2	88.2%
                            9	Novak	2015	31	5	86.1%
                            10	Novak	2011	21	4	84.0%
                            11	Nadal	2013	24	5	82.8%
                            12	Nadal	2013	24	5	82.8%
                            13	Federer	2006	19	4	82.6%
                            14	Becker	1989	12	3	80.0%
                            15	Lendl	1986	15	5	75.0%
                            16	Connors	1974	6	2	75.0%
                            17	Nadal	2008	17	6	73.9%
                            18	Villas	1977	13	5	72.2%
                            19	Wiland.	1988	7	3	70.0%
                            20	Nadal	2010	11	5	68.8%
                            21	Sampras	1993	13	6	68.4%
                            22	Sampras	1995	14	7	66.7%
                            23	Agassi	1999	12	6	66.7%
                            24	Federer	2009	15	10	60.0%
                            25	Laver	1969
                            Nekoliko sjajnih sezona Federera, ali ne i 2006. (previse je gubio od Rafe) Sve Borgove sezone su izuzetne u ovoj mjeri. Mekiroova naravno fantasticna.

                            --------------------

                            No da se vratim broju bodova. Tu dvije sezone odskacu. Federerova 2006. i Novakova 2015. Tesko je mjeriti ranije sezone. Ipak adjuci manje vise za svaki turnir 500, osim ekvivalent mastera (1000 poena), WTF-a (1500) i GS (2000), malo koja od ostalih sezona ne moze preci 15000. Vilasova, Konorsova i narocito Mekinroova su ispred ostalih.

                            Ova Novakova i Federerova 2006. lako prelaze 15000. Novakova je 16585. Za Federerovu cu dati posebni poste, ali ne moze se navuci preko 16000.
                            Last edited by NI; 23-11-15, 12:31.

                            Comment


                            • NI, nije ti dobra statistika. Novak 2015 ima omer 31:5, a Federer 2007 17:4 sto mozes i ovde da vidis http://www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bi...007qqITop_10qq
                              EDIT. Tek sad vidim da je Federer 2004 imao 18:0 protiv TOP 10 i 11:0 protiv TOP 5. Respect. Sta znaci pojava Nadala.
                              Last edited by skeptik; 23-11-15, 12:37.

                              Comment


                              • Koliko je to u praksi zaista bitno, kada znamo da bi svako od nas na svakom turniru na drugoj strani mreže htio vidjeti Ferrera prije nego barem 10 igrača mimo TOP 10?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X