Noki ima 3 Slema ove godine uz 10 000-ak bodova vise od najvoljenijeg. Ne vjerujem da gubi kap sna
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Pa on ne gubi, ali vi se svake godine nervirate oko ove nagrade, da je to postalo prenapornohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Lajk od mene Vladane sto si pojasnio ko je Noki
Zabole i osvajače i one koji nisu na listi za ovu listu max. Poenta je da su one besmislene i to je svakome jasno. Naravno da su se neki tu našli jer su se ponašali kao ok ljudi. Ja bih na primer za ovu godinu stavio i Federera za onaj poslednji celendž na W, kada je bez problema priznao poen Novaku. Ove liste su užarane samo zato što se odmah navataju likovi da nešto kao glume objektivnost i iščuđavaju se. Jbg jadnjikavo.I don't know anybody who's ever played tennis like this. Since I know this sport I've never seen somebody playing at this level.
sigpic
Comment
-
Volim cinjenice, Marej i Djokovic su masu bolji u porazu od Federera i Nadala, Novak posebno iskazuje postovanje protivnicima, Marej je sjajan u pobjedi, ubjedljivo najbolji, Smicekov potez je za postovanje i neka ga na listi, ali Novak to mnogo cesce radi pa ga nema. Nadalovo ponasanje ove godine na samom terenu nikako nije za nominaciju za fer plej, tako da ako ima njih trebalo bi da budu i ova dvojica. Posto se igraci ocigledno ne vode sportskim motivima i fer plejom ja cu to uvijek reci. Nije da mogu nesto da promijenim, ali cu svakako reci. Medjutim Kirios ima dosta drugara na turu i mogao se naci na listi, mozda i jeste ko zna, ali ATP ga nije smio i zvanicno staviti.
A i vec sam pomenuo po meni najvece sportiste u tenisu, nijednog nema na listi.sigpic
Comment
-
Djokovic psuje, dere se na one klince sto skupljaju loptice, siri ruke kad protivnik pogadja linije u fazonu kako ga sere i mogu jos da nabrajam koliko god hoces.
O Mareju necu ni da pocinjem, kad mu ne ide nema sta ga ne boli, za svaki deo tela se hvata, vuce se po terenu kao da ce da umre i onda potrci kao zec, raduje se greskama protivnika itd.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Meni je ova nagrada izgubila svaki smisao, ako je ikada i imala, onog trenutka kada je te godine dodeljena coveku koji je na WTF-u NAMERNO seo na stolicu koja je namenjena 1. igracu sveta i bez ikakvog pardona sklonio peskire sa njegovim imenom.Last edited by SnakeEyes; 14-10-15, 14:37.
Comment
-
A Federer se ne raduje greskama protivnika, cak se i dere sa CHUM JETZE kad neko ispuca ili posalje u mrezu. Balans. Apsolutno niko od njih nije savrsen, ali je to sve sala prema prijetnjama sudiji i trazenja da ti taj sudija vise ne sudi meceve. Ako je taj igrac fer plej, onda je svaki.sigpic
Comment
-
Federer se raduje greskama protivnika koliko i Marej?
Sad sam cula sve...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostDjokovic psuje, dere se na one klince sto skupljaju loptice, siri ruke kad protivnik pogadja linije u fazonu kako ga sere i mogu jos da nabrajam koliko god hoces.
ima tu jos kultnih, kad se obraca djokovicevoj porodici i sl. a i zena mu nije puno bolja, nego da ne zatrpavamo temu klipovima posto ih svakako ima previse. Dosadna si sto non stop okreces pricu na Djokovica i spustas se na nivo mnogih ovde koje osudjujes "bas me zanima kako bi forumasi ovde glasali i sl"
To sto te boli sto se napada jedna od Federerovih presvetih nagrada i sto Federer nije ali ni blizu dzentlmen i fer plej kakvim ga vi velicate zajedno sa medijima, to je druga stvar.
Pravis bezveze raspravu kad je Vladan samo ispravno bacio komentar. I ja sam poginuo od smeha kada sam video listu i namerno nisam hteo da postavaljam ovde jer sam znao sta ce se desiti. I nemoj molim te sa komentarima kome je stalo do ove nagrade, ne verujem da bi je iko menjao i za 5 poena na rang listiIt's not who you are underneath, it's what you do that defines you
Comment
-
Glasovi igrača su samo odraz mišljenja njihovih navijača, nema tu razlike.
Igraču koji se ponaša u duhu fer pleja sasvim je dovoljan dobar osećaj kako čini nešto ispravno i za to mu druga nagrada nije potrebna.
Inače je u najmanju ruku neumesno iz godine u godinu davati nagradu istom igraču ali to samo govori o količini licemera na turu.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by prskaj View Postima tu jos kultnih, kad se obraca djokovicevoj porodici i sl. a i zena mu nije puno bolja, nego da ne zatrpavamo temu klipovima posto ih svakako ima previse. Dosadna si sto non stop okreces pricu na Djokovica i spustas se na nivo mnogih ovde koje osudjujes "bas me zanima kako bi forumasi ovde glasali i sl"
To sto te boli sto se napada jedna od Federerovih presvetih nagrada i sto Federer nije ali ni blizu dzentlmen i fer plej kakvim ga vi velicate zajedno sa medijima, to je druga stvar.
Pravis bezveze raspravu kad je Vladan samo ispravno bacio komentar. I ja sam poginuo od smeha kada sam video listu i namerno nisam hteo da postavaljam ovde jer sam znao sta ce se desiti. I nemoj molim te sa komentarima kome je stalo do ove nagrade, ne verujem da bi je iko menjao i za 5 poena na rang listi
Meni je smesno sto Vladan tvrdi koliko je smesna ova nagrada i nema veze sa zivotom, ali je prvi da prokomentarise i kuka zasto nema Djokovica. Ako ga ne zanima, zasto je uopste postovao kandidate?
A kad bih ja krenula sa klipovima Djokovica, mislim da bi morala d apovecavam ogranicenje koliko yt klipova moze po postu da se postavi...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostNe bih ja imao problem sto nema Djokovica da nema Federera i Nadala, ali ja mislim da je Novak veci fer plej od njih dvojice, i ako su oni na listi, mora i on biti.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pecaros View PostInače je u najmanju ruku neumesno iz godine u godinu davati nagradu istom igraču ali to samo govori o količini licemera na turu.I don't know anybody who's ever played tennis like this. Since I know this sport I've never seen somebody playing at this level.
sigpic
Comment
Comment