Nisam, nešto mi govori da je Pancho bolji
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Izvini Gojko, racunaj kao da nisam ono ni napisao. Ja sam magaracsigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sandugp View PostIzvini Gojko, racunaj kao da nisam ono ni napisao. Ja sam magarac
Pa nisi napisao ništa loše, rekao si da razvaljujem sa postovima i da sam napravio pun pogodak sa izborom. Ovo za postove je ironično, ali ja ću da shvatim bukvalno, tako mi više odgovara.Last edited by goku; 28-09-15, 19:53.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gokara View PostA taman sam hteo napisati "ala se Sandu ispalio".
Pa nisi napisao ništa loše, rekao si da razvaljujem sa postovima i da sam napravio pun pogodak sa izborom. Ovo za postove je ironično, ali ja ću da shvatim bukvalno, tako mi više odgovara.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Zatvarajte glasanje dok još Pancho vodi.“It's no accident, I think, that tennis uses the language of life. Advantage, service, fault, break, love, the basic elements of tennis are those of everyday existence, because every match is a life in miniature. Points become games become sets become tournaments, and it's all so tightly connected that any point can become the turning point. It reminds me of the way seconds become minutes become hours, and any hour can be our finest. Or darkest. It's our choice.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostVlast.
Volis da se pitas!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Uu ... 2 razlike, prvo ozbiljnije vodjstvosigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View Post18:12 za Pancha
Veliki uspjeh Perla, Sandua, shminke...
Sa par postova su razbili propagandni mit Lejvera i gurnoli naprijd neopravdano zaboraljenog Gonzaleza.
mozemo da zakljucimo da Sandu i shminka imaju jak marketinghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shminka View PostGarant ce se ljudi isto ovako primiti na cinjenicu da su dodatnim usporavanjem podloga zaustavili Federera, odnosno pokusali zaustaviti
koje 1/2 ide prvo NI?
Federer-Nadal, Borg-Gonzalez ili
Borg-Nadal, Federer-Gonzalez
Prva opcija je bolja, ali tesko da bi forum to prezivio. Zato vjerovatno druga.
-----
Nabasao sam na Jednu interesantnu stvar, tabelu za igrace open ere iz sredine 2012. Poredjani su po % dobijenih meceva na svim podlogama. Onda sa to uporedio sa sadasnjim:
Code:God. Rank Igrac % Razlika 2012 1 Nadal 83.7% 2015 1 Nadal 82.9% -0.83% 2012 5 Rodzer 81.6% 2015 6 Rodzer 81.7% 0.06% 2012 8 Novak 78.5% 2015 3 Novak 82.1% 3.61%
http://www.patcash.co.uk/2012/10/gre...l-time-part-2/Last edited by NI; 29-09-15, 08:47.
Comment
-
Moj savet je da se izbaci i Nadal i Federer iz ovih glasanja, jer nista novo necemo procitati.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
NI ovo sto je Novak napredovao to je tek ludnica. Dokaz dominacije (koja na zalost nije materijalizovana slemovima koliko je trebalo i to je ono sto me najvise boli)
Fed-Nadal polufinale to hocemosigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
Comment