Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
    Nije ni cudo, jer tema je pogotovo medju Novakovim navijacima aktuelan a i normalno je da se tokom diskusije (bilo kakve) pocne sa jednom a zavrsi sa drugom stvari... To je prirodno, i spontano, nije se desilo jer je neko namerno hteo tako da "napravi"
    Super je sve to, ali nismo stigli do odgovora na prvo pitanje, samo smo ekstremno prosirili pricu
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
      A koliko bi Rodik imao slemova da nije bilo Feda, sigurno 5-6 i sta bi se tek o njemu pricalo.
      Izgleda da svako vreme ima svog Rodika
      Ima. Ali neki je bolji a drugi losiji.

      Mari-Rodik 8:3 ( Mari vodi u medjusobnim susretima)

      GS-ovi:

      Mari-Rodik 2(6):1(4) (broj titula i finala, Mari vodi)

      Mastersi:

      Mari-Rodik 9(4):5(4) (broj titula i finala, Mari vodi)

      % dobojenih meceva:

      Mari-Rodik 76.3%(12):74.2%(18) (Marijev i Rodikov postotak dobijenih meceva i njihovo mjesto na vjecnoj listi)
      Last edited by NI; 07-04-15, 09:52.

      Comment


      • Ne shvatam tabelu, je l ti ovo prvo h2h?
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Rodik bio no.1, zavrsio godinu kao no.1, Marej nece nikad

          I moras da racunas neke SF koji su njih dvojica igrali, gde je pobednik bio ogroman favoit u finalu, kao SF W 2003, SF AO 2007
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            Rodik bio no.1, zavrsio godinu kao no.1, Marej nece nikad

            I moras da racunas neke SF koji su njih dvojica igrali, gde je pobednik bio ogroman favoit u finalu, kao SF W 2003, SF AO 2007
            Dokazivati da je Federer bolji od Novaka je lako. Dokazivati da je Rodik bolji od Marija je nemoguce.

            Spoiler

            Comment


            • Ti si prvi krenuo u pricu SBBKBB, sta bi bilo da je Marej dobio neke meceve, ja sam ti isti primer dala za Rodika
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Ti si prvi krenuo u pricu SBBKBB, sta bi bilo da je Marej dobio neke meceve, ja sam ti isti primer dala za Rodika
                Samo da bi tim primerom osporila pricu o slaboj eri u Fedovom prajmu ... Sto ne dade primere Riosa ili Ivanisevica?
                sigpic

                Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
                  Samo da bi tim primerom osporila pricu o slaboj eri u Fedovom prajmu ... Sto ne dade primere Riosa ili Ivanisevica?
                  zato sto je Fed direktni krivac sto Rodik nije multislem sampion
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Pa u tome je poenta, trpao je on Rodika kad i gde je stigao kao sto je Nadal nesto kasnije trpao njega. Da nije bilo Nadala Federer bi imao 4 RG (usudicu se da kazem) i zajebao i Lejvera .... I sta sada to dokazuje?
                    Da je period u kome je Fed dominirao bio slabiji nego kada su se pojavili Nadal i Djokovic pa i Marej? Jer je Fed tada imao od 25 do 30 godina, sto su u sadasnjem tenisu najbolje godine. Kako to da tada nije mogao sa njima da se nosi. Podesticu te na jednu bitnu cinjenicu, on je dugo vremena imao negativan h2h sa Marejem. I to bas kada je bio u najboljim teniskim godinama. Popravio je taj h2h tek kasnije kada je "omatorio" kao sto vi Fedovci volite da kazete. Znaci sta?
                    sigpic

                    Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                    U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                    Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                    Comment


                    • Evo taj cuveni H2H ce Noki imati prilike da oseti na svojoj kozi.
                      Sad kad on dominira, koliko puta mu je dosao Nadal na penal? A koliko puta mu dolazi Fed?
                      Nadal je redovno bezao od susreta sa jakim igracima kad nije 100% spreman, radije bi da gubi od tada Blejka, Mishe, pa cak i Ferera nego od Roleta, kao sto mu je sad draze da pukne od Verdasca, Raonica nego od Djokovica.

                      Jeste, Marej je imao pozitivan H2H, ali je jedini bitan mec koji je dobio finale OI, sve ostale velike meceve je Role lagano dobijao.
                      Sta vredi Djokovicu ovakav h2h protiv Mareja, kad je 2 finala slema, plus polufinale OI pukao?
                      Sta bi ti vise voleo, da je izgubio na nekim tupavim mastersima ili na slemovima?
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Rafael Nadal u tom periodu svoje karijere nije bio dovoljno dobar da bi na ostalim podlogama sem sljake i dva puta trave (govorim o slemovima samo) dolazio na "penal" Federeru. I tu nije Federer nista kriv, niti je Nadal bezao od njega.
                        To sto Novaku sada dolazi Federer a ne Nadal govori samo o tome koliko je Federer (i dalje) dobar.
                        Samo je jedna stvar bitna. A to je da ono sto Aki potencira kako bi najbolji Federer lagano oduvao najboljeg Novaka nikako ne pije vodu. Jer je to sve sbb-kbb. To nikada (na srecu Federerovih navijaca ) necemo saznati tj pobednika tog meca i ko bi koga "oduvao"
                        sigpic

                        Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                        U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                        Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                        Comment


                        • Ja to nisam izjavila, a najbolji Noki vs najbolji Fed bi bio odlican mec, ali bi moralo da se gleda i po podlogama i jedino gde bi ja blagu prednost dala Nokiju je spori hard

                          a to da nije dovoljno dobar bio Nadal...
                          2013. je kao Fed bio dovoljno dobar? ali to ga nije sprecilo da mu cak 4 puta dodje na penal
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Jos jedna stvar je bitna i govori kako je Feki ipak dolazio za nijansu lakse do svojih slemova u odnosu na Nokija na primer. Naime Feki je 5 od svojih 17 titula uzeo tako sto je u finalu igrao protiv likova kojima je to bilo prvo GS finale a Noki je samo jednom od osam puta bio u takvoj situaciji.

                            Dao bih prednost Federeru na travi i brzem hardu ( tu malu) a Djokovicu na sporom hardu i sljaci (tu malu). Svakako da bi bli odlicni mecevi.
                            sigpic

                            Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                            U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                            Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                            Comment


                            • Vidis, ja na sljaci ne bi, 50-50, a mozda cak i mala na strani Feda

                              A Fed je dominirao u svojoj eri, nije dozvoljavao da mu neko tek tako uzima slemove, kao sto je Djokovic dozvolio jednom Cilicu i Vavrinki, pa cak i Mareju i to je najveca razlika izmedju njih dvojice.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Tu se slazem. Previse je dobrih prilika Novak propustio, ali ima vremena da sve to ispravi.
                                sigpic

                                Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                                U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                                Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X