Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pa nije sramota biti rudar
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Stop stereotipima, pravda za rudare u dvadesetim
      in another life
      I will love you again, RF.

      Comment


      • Sedam cifara, tako se prica. Jedan od plaćenijih rudara.
        Spoiler
        sedam nula mu dodje 10 miliona
        Last edited by Indigo; 08-11-14, 01:03.
        There's something wrong with me chemically
        Something wrong with me inherently
        The wrong mix in the wrong genes
        I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
        It was the wrong plan
        In the wrong hands
        With the wrong theory for the wrong man
        The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
        The wrong questions with the wrong replies

        Comment


        • Mogao bi odraditi jedan turnir za raju sa foruma, ništa mu ne bi falilo

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
            Pa Dimitrov i Nisikori imaju vise fanova od Novaka i Mareja npr.
            Ocigledno su glasali Federerovu fanovi za Dimitrova, Nisikori ipak ima Aziju iza sebe, mada smo vidjeli koliko je i tu Djokovic jak. Dimitrov i Nisikori zajendo na fb nemaju milion lajkova, Djokovic pet i po miliona o sponzorima i podrsci na najvecim terenima svijeta i da ne pocinjem.
            amater

            http://www.wtatennis.com/news/articl...-facebook-fans

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ClayWarrior View Post
              Ti ces nam sigurno onda potanko objasniti zasto je Nadal veci od Lejvera (imas cak i Opste diskusije za to, zauzmi celu temu, ionako paucinu skuplja).. ovaj forum crce za Rodom a nikako to niko da im predoci
              GS: Nadal 14, Lejver 11
              Titule: Nadal 64, Lejver 52
              Procenat uspešnosti: Nadal 83,5 (najbolji u istoriji), Lejver 79,8 (Novak je bolji dosta 81,1)
              Jel dovoljno?

              Znam da je glupo, ali pokušaj da zamisliš kako bi taj meč izgledao, ja se bojim. Kad pogledam neke mečeve pre recimo Borgovog vremena bude mi smešno kakav se tenis igrao. Znam da je takvo vreme bilo, drveni reketi i sve ostalo, ali mi je to vreme u kojem je Lejver igrao neuporedivo sa ovim danas, dok recimo vreme u kojem su igrali Lendl, Vilander, onda Beker, Edberg i posle Sampras i Agasi mogu da poredim sa ovim sada.

              Nadal kao drugi najveći u istoriji može da ima konkurenciju samo u Borgu i Samprasu. Borg je bio čudo, ali se rano povukao.
              Ne sumnjam da je Lejver možda više od bilo koga drugog uradio za razvoj tenisa kao sporta, ali to je druga tema.
              Last edited by goku; 11-11-14, 13:31.

              Comment


              • Izjednaci uslove, daj Lejveru ovu tehnologiju, uslove, rekete ili daj Nadalu drveni reket pa tek onda pocni sa uporedjivanjem.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Na stranu to sto ce CW za koju sekundu da te unakazi, ne znam kada ce ljudi shvatiti da ne mogu da se porede razlicite ere u bilo kojem sportu.
                  U potpunosti sam toshvatio relativno skoro i od tada mi je mnogo lakse. Ni ne pomisljam da poredim neke sportiste jer sam shvatio koliko je to sustinski nemoguce. Mnogo razlicitih faktora, a videli smo koliko samo promena jedne stvari drasticno utice u sportu.

                  Pa ovi bili uveli pljavi sljaku samo jednom, nastao haos kao da se igra na mesecevom kamenu.
                  It's not who you are underneath, it's what you do that defines you

                  Comment


                  • Sa njegovih 150+ osvojenih turnira, dobro si ga potcenio.
                    There's something wrong with me chemically
                    Something wrong with me inherently
                    The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                    I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                    It was the wrong plan
                    In the wrong hands
                    With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                    The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                    The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                    Comment


                    • a tata se prilagodio

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by prskaj View Post
                        Na stranu to sto ce CW za koju sekundu da te unakazi, ne znam kada ce ljudi shvatiti da ne mogu da se porede razlicite ere u bilo kojem sportu.
                        U potpunosti sam toshvatio relativno skoro i od tada mi je mnogo lakse. Ni ne pomisljam da poredim neke sportiste jer sam shvatio koliko je to sustinski nemoguce. Mnogo razlicitih faktora, a videli smo koliko samo promena jedne stvari drasticno utice u sportu.

                        Pa ovi bili uveli pljavi sljaku samo jednom, nastao haos kao da se igra na mesecevom kamenu.
                        dok se CW povati, uzeo secer i vodu, pa ce da pocne sa pisanjem
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                          Izjednaci uslove, daj Lejveru ovu tehnologiju, uslove, rekete ili daj Nadalu drveni reket pa tek onda pocni sa uporedjivanjem.
                          U pravu si, ali ja nisam ni hteo da ih poredim, to mi je CW tražio.
                          U prvom delu posta brojkama sam objasnio zašto mislim da je Nadal bolji od Lejvera, jer je više uradio u svom vremenu nego što je Lejver u svom.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by goku View Post
                            U pravu si, ali ja nisam ni hteo da ih poredim, to mi je CW tražio.
                            U prvom delu posta brojkama sam objasnio zašto mislim da je Nadal bolji od Lejvera, jer je više uradio u svom vremenu nego što je Lejver u svom.
                            Nemoj druze. Zovite hitnu za CW-a.
                            Pogedaj samo 1969 godinu.
                            There's something wrong with me chemically
                            Something wrong with me inherently
                            The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                            I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                            It was the wrong plan
                            In the wrong hands
                            With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                            The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                            The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by goku View Post
                              U pravu si, ali ja nisam ni hteo da ih poredim, to mi je CW tražio.
                              U prvom delu posta brojkama sam objasnio zašto mislim da je Nadal bolji od Lejvera, jer je više uradio u svom vremenu nego što je Lejver u svom.
                              Bolje stani na vreme...
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Indigo View Post
                                Sa njegovih 150+ osvojenih turnira, dobro si ga potcenio.
                                Na ATP sajtu ne piše tako.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X