I sta hoces da kazes, da su Monfils, Berdih, Fis itd. bolji igraci od Hjuita,Moje, Henmana,Safina itd?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostIndigo ja se ne slazem sa tvojom konstatacijom, da nije bilo Federera, svi ti silni igraci bi bili visestruki osvajaci GS, a on je, da ponovim kao papagaj, dominirao i niko mu nista nije mogao.
Ja ne znam zasto je to tako tesko priznati i reci, nego je potrebno osporavati njegove uspehe?
A kao sto sam vec rekla, i ja ovu Djokovicu sezonu i sve ove pobede mogu da osporim, Nadal nije u nekoj formi, Fed je mator, Marej je psihicki los, ostatak tura je presmesan.
Poenta na koju hocu da ukazem je i da Roger igra svoj najbolji tenis 2004-2007 u ovom periodu sigurno ne bi osvojio 12 GS titula ali sigurno jer konkurenti su sada Murray, Delpo, Rafa i Novak a u toj konkurenciji je uzeo "samo" 4 GS titule ;)There's something wrong with me chemically
Something wrong with me inherently
The wrong mix in the wrong genes
I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
It was the wrong plan
In the wrong hands
With the wrong theory for the wrong man
The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
The wrong questions with the wrong replies
Comment
-
Originally posted by BOKI1969 View PostNeznam zasto odbacijes takvu mogucnost mogla bi ispasti smesna za nekih 5-6 godina a kad smo kod Rogerovih rekorda vec su mu 2 pala od strane novaka a bice ih jos nadam se
i nije provokacija, nego ozbiljno nemam pojmahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Indigo View PostJa tako isto mogu da osporim onda i Rogerove ;) Agassi i Sampras zavrsavali karijere, Hewit i Nalbandian vecito povredjeni, Rodick covek ima kompleks od Fedexa, Ferrero covek koji ni sam ne zna kako je uspeo biti prvi, to samo govori o kakvoj konkurenciji se tada radilo, pa vecini tih top 20 igraca sada u ovoj eri tenisa ne bi bili ni u top 50......Al ajde ne mogu nikako da mu osporim ipak je to 16 GS TITULA tesko je uci i u QF jednog a ne osvojiti 16 puta i to kompletirati na svim podlogama....
Poenta na koju hocu da ukazem je i da Roger igra svoj najbolji tenis 2004-2007 u ovom periodu sigurno ne bi osvojio 12 GS titula ali sigurno jer konkurenti su sada Murray, Delpo, Rafa i Novak a u toj konkurenciji je uzeo "samo" 4 GS titule ;)
Iako si stavio pod navodnike, to dovoljno govori o tome kolika je velicina Roger, kad su 'samo' 4 GS.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostI sta hoces da kazes, da su Monfils, Berdih, Fis itd. bolji igraci od Hjuita,Moje, Henmana,Safina itd?
Comment
-
морам да признам да се слажем са Индигом... и ја мислим да је била слабија конкуренција у време владавине федексаЗабибери ударац момче!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__jLJE3T4XQ&NR=1
Comment
-
Dominik Hrbati je preko 30 puta tukao igrace iz prvih 10 i nikada nije uspeo da udje u tu grupu.. dajem glavu ako Troicki ima vise od 5 pobeda nad istima
Do prekosutra mozemo o jacini era (mada se nekad bar znalo koja je koja podloga i imali smo ih 4) ali nemojte nekome osporavati broj Slemova jer u tom slucaju oni osvojeni u zlatnoj eri sa kraja 70-ih i tokom 80-ih vrede troduplo i izbacuju Lendla na mesto najveceg igraca Open erePancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Indigo View PostPoenta na koju hocu da ukazem je i da Roger igra svoj najbolji tenis 2004-2007 u ovom periodu sigurno ne bi osvojio 12 GS titula ali sigurno jer konkurenti su sada Murray, Delpo, Rafa i Novak a u toj konkurenciji je uzeo "samo" 4 GS titule ;)
Naravno da ne bi osvojio 12, pa ako to neko osporava, onda nema smisla ništa pisati Sampras je završio karijeru u tom periodu, Nalbandian i Safin su sigurno veći talenti od skoro svih današnjih tenisera, ali oni nikada nisu imali koninuitet, nisu bili maksimalno posvećeni tenisu, tome Federer nije kriv. Za Safina mi je krivo, omiljeni teniser, morao je puno više. Jedan je od rijetkih koji je dobio Federera otvorenog garda na AO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by notorious View PostNaravno da ne bi osvojio 12, pa ako to neko osporava, onda nema smisla ništa pisati Sampras je završio karijeru u tom periodu, Nalbandian i Safin su sigurno veći talenti od skoro svih današnjih tenisera, ali oni nikada nisu imali koninuitet, nisu bili maksimalno posvećeni tenisu, tome Federer nije kriv. Za Safina mi je krivo, omiljeni teniser, morao je puno više. Jedan je od rijetkih koji je dobio Federera otvorenog garda na AO.Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by ClayWarrior View PostDominik Hrbati je preko 30 puta tukao igrace iz prvih 10 i nikada nije uspeo da udje u tu grupu.. dajem glavu ako Troicki ima vise od 5 pobeda nad istima
Do prekosutra mozemo o jacini era (mada se nekad bar znalo koja je koja podloga i imali smo ih 4) ali nemojte nekome osporavati broj Slemova jer u tom slucaju oni osvojeni u zlatnoj eri sa kraja 70-ih i tokom 80-ih vrede troduplo i izbacuju Lendla na mesto najveceg igraca Open ere
Da se mene pita, Grozni bi i bio najveći
Comment
-
Originally posted by notorious View PostNetačno, kraj Samprasa nije nijednom prošao do titule, jer on tada nije igrao. Kraj Agassi-a je prolazio kada je ovaj već imao oko 35 godina. Ja ne sporim titule Federeru, samo kažem da Novak danas ne može uzeti turnir, a da ne prođe kraj teniske legende. Obojica imaju nevjerovatan kontinuitet, nemaju nekih kikseva, Rafa nema kiks otpočetka sezone, Federer ima 2, i teško je kraj takvih uzimati turnir za turnirom, svi smo off
Ali ako cemo tako, nije ni Novak do sada "prosao" Nadala do svoje GS titule... ;)
I Roger je morao proci mnoge, 2005. godine su Roger i Andre igrali finale USO, a iste te godine je vec Rafa osvojio RG... Sve vrijeme je tu Safin, a ni Hjuit, Ferero, Rodik i ostali nisu bas za odbaciti...
Comment
-
Originally posted by BOKI1969 View Postukupan broj vezanih pobeda od pocetka kalendarske godine i ukupan niz- Novak je bolji u obahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ClayWarrior View PostDominik Hrbati je preko 30 puta tukao igrace iz prvih 10 i nikada nije uspeo da udje u tu grupu.. dajem glavu ako Troicki ima vise od 5 pobeda nad istima>>>BrojimIzbrojao sam sate, minute, sekunde do pogleda na Mourinja u dresu MANCHESTER UNITED-a ! <<<
Comment
Comment