Pa dobro, nije prvi put da Peter Bodo, diskutira o karakteru Nadala i posebno njegovim uspesima na sljaku. Mislim to je njegov prilicno subjektivan stav, ali meni je smesno reci da je dosadno i zamorno sto neko ima toliko uspeha. A, kako to Rafa pretstavlja pred javnost je njegova licna stvar i malo je neumesno komentarisati, jer svako to radi na svoj nacin, a na nama je dali nam se dopada ili ne, ali kritikovati je preterano.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
A nije neumesno stalno kukati kako koleno nije dobro i kako se raspada, a onda od 7 turnira uci u isto toliko finala i osvojiti 5 turnira?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostA nije neumesno stalno kukati kako koleno nije dobro i kako se raspada, a onda od 7 turnira uci u isto toliko finala i osvojiti 5 turnira?
Comment
-
To se zove lazna skromnost, on nikad nije favorit iako je osvojio ne znam ni sama koliko titula na sljaci i ima neki bolestan odnos pobeda i poraza.
On igra protiv nekog ko nije ni u top 100 i jos kaze da nije favorit...
A sto se tice kuknjave, on ima redovan izgovor kad izgubi, bole ga kolena i onda svi novinari i ceo svet poveruje da njemu zaista fali nesto
ukratko, najobicniji foliranthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostTo se zove lazna skromnost, on nikad nije favorit iako je osvojio ne znam ni sama koliko titula na sljaci i ima neki bolestan odnos pobeda i poraza.
On igra protiv nekog ko nije ni u top 100 i jos kaze da nije favorit...
A sto se tice kuknjave, on ima redovan izgovor kad izgubi, bole ga kolena i onda svi novinari i ceo svet poveruje da njemu zaista fali nesto
ukratko, najobicniji folirant
Comment
-
Originally posted by Niki View PostKako hoces ga nazovi, to je on, nismo mi ovde da sudimo njihov karakter nego njihovu igru. Zato valjda gledamo tenis, zbog onoga sto se dogadja na terenu. A, ne vidim kako "folirant" moze osvojiti toliko titula. Uopste ne mislim da se tako ponasa, ali to je nebitno, bitna je njegova igra i njegovi rezultati. A oni ove godine su sjajni. Ma ko sta pricao, treba izaci i odigrati, a to se ne postize foliranjem
A folirant je u smislu da je postigao sta je sve postigao posle pauze, a i dalje izjavljuje da mu kolena nisu dobro i da igra u bolovimahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Da on ima ozbiljnih problema sa kolenima, kako zeli da predstavi, ne bi on osvojio 5 od 7 turnira, igrao 7 finala i jos osvojio betonski masters.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
dobro je Miko, u pravu sihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostTo se zove lazna skromnost, on nikad nije favorit iako je osvojio ne znam ni sama koliko titula na sljaci i ima neki bolestan odnos pobeda i poraza.
On igra protiv nekog ko nije ni u top 100 i jos kaze da nije favorit...
A sto se tice kuknjave, on ima redovan izgovor kad izgubi, bole ga kolena i onda svi novinari i ceo svet poveruje da njemu zaista fali nesto
ukratko, najobicniji folirant
A vidis, Federer i Djokovic mukice svaki turnir igraju sa povredom, ali to izdrzavaju muski, dok Nadal nema nikakvih problema, ali zato pauzira 8 meseci. Bas dobra logika. Ma bitno da je on sve prevario svojim lazima o povredi, kakav mastermind, sta li je sve dobio takvim obmanama, mora da sedi kuci i sladi se svojom lukavoscu.
A sto se tice kukanja oko povrede, kao neko ko prati Nadala skoro celu karijeru, znam da gotovo od pocetka trpi bolove u kolenima, ali je uvek govorio da ga bol ne sprecava da igra, i da je naucio kako da igra uz taj osecaj. Tako da nije uopste iznenadjenje sto pobedjuje dok jos uvek oseca bol, jer to radi tokom citave karijere.13/13!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sarafa View PostNe znam sto ste se toliko uhvatili tih njegovih izjava da nije favorit. Ja ne znam kad su Federer ili Djokovic rekli "E, ja sam favorit na ovom turniru i sad cu sve da ih razbijem". I zasto je to uopste bitno, ne zeli covek sam sebe da hvali, a i ne treba.
A vidis, Federer i Djokovic mukice svaki turnir igraju sa povredom, ali to izdrzavaju muski, dok Nadal nema nikakvih problema, ali zato pauzira 8 meseci. Bas dobra logika. Ma bitno da je on sve prevario svojim lazima o povredi, kakav mastermind, sta li je sve dobio takvim obmanama, mora da sedi kuci i sladi se svojom lukavoscu.
A sto se tice kukanja oko povrede, kao neko ko prati Nadala skoro celu karijeru, znam da gotovo od pocetka trpi bolove u kolenima, ali je uvek govorio da ga bol ne sprecava da igra, i da je naucio kako da igra uz taj osecaj. Tako da nije uopste iznenadjenje sto pobedjuje dok jos uvek oseca bol, jer to radi tokom citave karijere.
Kao prvo, ti ne mozes da znas koliki je taj bol i da li on preuvelicava ili ne. Ali sta je sve osvojio i sta sve i dalje osvaja, ocigledno to nije povreda zbog koje se karijera dovodi u pitanje, kao sto oni predstavljaju.
A svaki teniser 100% vremena ima manje ili vece povrede, ali ne kukaju...
Poslednji primer je Marej koji ima povredu ledja jos od 2011. godine, a tek se sada saznalo da je toliko ozbiljno. Da je Nadal u pitanju, ne smem ni da pomislim kakve bi informacije sve dolazile u javnosthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Pola mog post-a si zanemarila, ali dobro.
Znaci ja ne mogu da znam, ali ti mozes da znas kakvu povredu ledja ima Marej. Zanimljivo. Isto tako kao sto ja ne mogu da znam da li taj bol postoji, ni ti ne mozes da znas da ne postoji, tako da ne znam cemu silna prozivanja.
I ja ne znam odakle vam to da je zbog povrede kolena njegova karijera dovedna u pitanje, kad je on jasno naglasio da to nije slucaj, ali hejteri ce uvek sami naci razlog da jos vise mrze.13/13!
Comment
-
strika Toni nekoliko puta izjavio da su mislili da nece vise igrati...
pa kod Mareja se videlo, zato sto pukne na turniru, ne desava mu se da osvoji turnir ili visen njih u nizu, pa onda izjavi da je povredjen...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment