Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
    Ma nisam ja za mijenjanje ali Slamovi nisu pod ATPom, samim tim mogu da rade sto oce.
    Ma neka uvedu to, ali neka kazu da to pocinje od sledece godine, a ne sad, kad je postalo jasno da Nadal ne moze da bude top 4 do RG-a.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Ma kakvi sponzori, Ferrer nije dovoljno jak, a ostala trojka bi bila vise nego zadovoljna da Nadal upadne u TOP 2. Za sve najjace win - win situacija.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • Federer vuce najvise sponzora od cijelog Toura, tako da stavljanje Feda u nesto tezu situaciju sa tim zrijebom bi mogla rezultovat da sponzori negoduju, a vec ste pricali o tome kako Nike namjesta zrijebove ovo ono, pa kad ih vec namjesta dovoljno je da namjste Feda van dohvata Nadalu na slamovima
        sigpic
        "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
        AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

        Comment


        • Federeru je isto, on i Nadal ne mogu biti 1. i 2. a ne mogu ni 3. i 4.
          Ako je 2. Nadal mu moze doci u 1/4 finalu, ako je 3. isto. Ali ako je Nadal 2. onda prije 1/2 finala ne moze.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • Ma nije RG cirkus da se zazaju s tim stvarima

            Comment


            • Kako Fed ne moze biti drugi, mislim nisam u tenisu od Australie tako da ne pratim tako redovno, ali koliko vidim razlika izmedju njega i Murraya je 100 bodova?
              sigpic
              "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
              AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

              Comment


              • Moze on biti 2. ali Nadal ne moze biti 1. pa da se prije finala ne sretnu, u svim ostalim situacijama ako se ne napravi presedan Federeru moze doci Nadal u 1/4 finalu. Samim tim mu presedan odgovara.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • Totalno je nebitno da li to Fedu odgovara ili ne, mi pricamo o RGu, a ne o lokalnom cirkusu
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Mislim da je njemu svejedno, jer nece mega sponzori koje vuku ova dvojica dozvoliti da se nadju prije 1/2 finala najmanje.. Mozda je ljubiteljima tenisa u interesu da se mec Djokovic Nadal igra u finalu, ali mislim da novac zeli Federera i Nadala u finalu..

                    Svijet novac pokrece
                    sigpic
                    "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
                    AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

                    Comment


                    • Dajte nam i Rafu i Noleta i Andyja...nije problem

                      Comment


                      • Pitanje jedno. Kada je Murray ispao u MCu, u kojoj rundi? Jer branio je 180 bodova, odnosno cetvrtfinale od prosle godine.. Razlika izmedju njega i Feda je 80 bodova. Lista nije refreshovana tako da Federer je drugi od sutra??
                        sigpic
                        "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
                        AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

                        Comment


                        • Jeste, posto nije stigao do QF, od sutra je Fed no.2, mislim da je razlika 10 poena
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by maliajnstajn View Post
                            Pitanje jedno. Kada je Murray ispao u MCu, u kojoj rundi? Jer branio je 180 bodova, odnosno cetvrtfinale od prosle godine.. Razlika izmedju njega i Feda je 80 bodova. Lista nije refreshovana tako da Federer je drugi od sutra??
                            Da bre
                            Everything you want is on the other side of fear.

                            Comment


                            • Federer je drugi sigurno dvije nedelje, onda se Murray opet vraca na drugo mjesto posto prosle godine nije igrao Madrid, mada je igrao Barcu, a izgubice bodove iz cetvrtfinala, no hard je Madrid, tu ce zaraditi, dok Federer moze samo da odbrani. I u Rimu je ranije od Rogera ispao, a Roger tesko da preko polufinala moze, jedino da izbjegne i Djokovica i Nadala sto je moguce da se desi naravno, ali malo vjerovatno.
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                              • A to Federer vise ne moze da dobije njih dvojicu?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X