Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stigao je vec do 4. mjesta, tamo je Mekinroova '84. ;)

    http://www.tennis.com/articles/templ...15315&zoneid=9

    Comment


    • Becker: Key to tennis success is chess

      EXCLUSIVE: Tennis legend Boris Becker tells Eurosport-Yahoo! that playing chess is the key to unlocking a mental edge on the court and cites Roger Federer as the master.

      Becker revealed his love for chess and ritual of playing the game before going on court to ensure that he was mentally prepared for battle against rivals such as John McEnroe.

      The six-time Grand Slam singles champion believes that Roger Federer would be the best chess player and regards his strategic thinking as the key to the Swiss star's success.

      "One thing that not many people know about me is my love for chess. I took it up as a teenager, and it always helped my tennis as a mental stimulation," Becker told Eurosport-Yahoo!.

      "Like in tennis, strategy is very important in chess. It's a one-on-one situation, and it is very important to always remain one step ahead of the opponent.

      "I used to prepare for my tennis matches by playing chess, and it would get my mind stimulated and focused before going on court. It was essentially a mental warm-up."

      He added: "Mental energy is hugely important for success in tennis, and chess is the perfect way to tune the mind in to the stresses and strains of the game.

      "Of the current players, Roger Federer would be the best. He thinks in the right way, always trying to stay one step ahead of his opponent and always concentrating on strategy and tactics."

      Becker is adamant that chess should be used by the current top players to gain a competitive and mental edge over their opponents.

      "Many of the older players such as Ivan Lendl used to play chess, but I'm not sure if many of the modern-day players play the game," he said.

      "Rafael Nadal would also be good at chess because he is a strategic thinker and remains very focused on court, but Federer would be the best.

      "Federer still has the hunger, desire, fitness and ability to win Grand Slams, and I can see him becoming the world's best once more in 2012.

      "Chess involves the same mental approach as tennis, and many players could improve their performance if they employed such methods to focus on the game before they go on court," he added.

      Becker believes 2011 will go down as one of the greatest ever years in men's tennis, and puts the dramatic rise to prominence of Novak Djokovic down to his mental strength.

      "Novak Djokovic, something must have exploded in his mind because he has suddenly become a much more focused, mentally strong player," he said.

      "His performance has dramatically improved over the last 12 months, and I think much of his development has been mental.

      "Essentially, Djokovic is thinking much better in crucial moments of matches, and that is the key to his success."

      He added: "Andy Murray has the quality and the talent, and he must find now find this same ingredient.

      "Without doubt, 2011 has been one of the best ever seasons in the history of men's tennis and next season can be even better."

      Boris Becker was speaking at the opening day of the London Chess Classic 2011 at Kensington Olympia. The tournament runs until 12th December and tickets are available at www.chessinschools.co.uk
      Eurosport
      Eto sta je glava u tenisu
      sigpic

      Comment


      • The 10 Greatest Men's Seasons: No. 3, Djokovic's 2011

        Ostala su jos 2 mesta, pretpostavljam da ce to biti Nadal 2008. i Federer 2006. Sa tim da je Fedova 2005. godina isto bila odlicna, ali ipak je Nadal 2008. godine osvojio i OI, tako da pretpostavljam da ce to presuditi.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
          The 10 Greatest Men's Seasons: No. 3, Djokovic's 2011

          Ostala su jos 2 mesta, pretpostavljam da ce to biti Nadal 2008. i Federer 2006. Sa tim da je Fedova 2005. godina isto bila odlicna, ali ipak je Nadal 2008. godine osvojio i OI, tako da pretpostavljam da ce to presuditi.
          Nadalova 2008 bolja od Novakove 2011,pa ne bih bas rekao,ali ajde sta me briga to jedan covek bira
          Last edited by MiljanVR; 06-12-11, 23:11.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNJPWuJdVTQ http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._3602351_n.jpg http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...13714580_n.jpg http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...32341258_n.jpg

          Comment


          • MIljane, ja samo tipujem da ce biti Nadalova 2008. godina, ali mozda i gresim
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              MIljane, ja samo tipujem da ce biti Nadalova 2008. godina, ali mozda i gresim
              Ma ok ja tebi nista ne kazem,ali mi je smesno kako moze da izabere da je Nadalova(ako izabere)2008 bolja od Novakove 2011 LOL(jos jednom ako izabere Nadalovu 2008,to je samo nagadjanje)
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNJPWuJdVTQ http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._3602351_n.jpg http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...13714580_n.jpg http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...32341258_n.jpg

              Comment


              • Ne znam kako se neko uopste usudio da Djokovica stavi na 3. mjesto, pa sve i da su na prva dva Chuck Norris i Bata Zivojinovic.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by majabl View Post
                  Ne znam kako se neko uopste usudio da Djokovica stavi na 3. mjesto, pa sve i da su na prva dva Chuck Norris i Bata Zivojinovic.


                  Ima dosta igrac koji su uspeli osvojiti 3 GS-a u jednoj sezoni, a neki su osvojili i sva 4. Nisu mastersi bas toliko bitni, tj broj koliko ih je neko osvojio.

                  Comment


                  • Ali posto on gleda sve sezone od Open Ere, tj. od 1968. godine, onda Lejverova 1969. mora da bude na prvom mestu.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by majabl View Post
                      Ne znam kako se neko uopste usudio da Djokovica stavi na 3. mjesto, pa sve i da su na prva dva Chuck Norris i Bata Zivojinovic.
                      Ajde uporedi Nadalovu 2008(jedino OI i RG od od najboljih) i Novakovu 2011?Jos jednom ovo je nagadjanje
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNJPWuJdVTQ http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._3602351_n.jpg http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...13714580_n.jpg http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...32341258_n.jpg

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Ali posto on gleda sve sezone od Open Ere, tj. od 1968. godine, onda Lejverova 1969. mora da bude na prvom mestu.
                        Vjerovatno nece stavljati jednog igraca vise puta, Federer i Nadal su vec na listi, mislim da ce prva dva mjesta biti Lejver i Lendl. ;)

                        Comment


                        • Ako ne stavi Fedovu 2006. godinu, onda bolje i da nije sastavljao listu.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Bolje je 2 Slama i OI nego 3 Slama ako mene pitate,ipak se OI igraju svake 4 godine i to je nesto najvece za svakog sportistu
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • Prosle godine smo ovdje komentarisali play off za WC za AO,ima tenisa jos uvijek

                              Chris Guccione

                              http://www.tennis.com.au/tournaments...live-streaming
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                              • E Gucione odmah pretrpeo brejk, onaj mu uzeo 3 poena na istu foru, ritern pod noge, a Gucione kao mutav izlazi na mrezu
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X